Re: RE: embarrassing statistical question

2002-02-12 Thread Kenneth M. Steele
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002 12:27:08 -0600 Paul C. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But I assume that also means that they're not likely to encounter much in the way of grouped data. Sure, I can think of some situations in which they might (secondary analyses of previously grouped data), but I've

RE: RE: embarrassing statistical question

2002-02-12 Thread Paul C. Smith
Kenneth M. Steele wrote: In an important sense, all data is grouped-data. We specify some boundary conditions of inclusion/exclusion in a unit and those conditions typically cover a range of variations which we *might* attend to under other circumstances. To continue with and (likely)