RE: Psychology's biggest challenge (long post)

2000-02-21 Thread Ballard, John
Stephen Black wrote: I'd say that the biggest challenge is keeping the pseudoscience out of psychology. To which I replied: I'd argue that the biggest challenge is not "throwing the baby out with the bathwater". Anomalous psychological phenomena, such as clairvoyance and precognition, occur.

Psych's biggest challenge

2000-02-21 Thread Drnanjo
Listfolk, John Ballard wrote: As psychologists we understand how one can misinterpret, embellish, have faulty recall. I believe these reports warrant skeptism but one that is open to what nature gives us. Many years ago I studied a woman who reported having precognitive dreams since birth. For

RE: Psychology's biggest challenge (long post)

2000-02-21 Thread Paul C. Smith
John Ballard wrote: Many years ago I studied a woman who reported having precognitive dreams since birth. For about two years we recorded her dreams and she made calls as to how confident she was about whether the dreams were precognitive. We found that when she was highly confident that the

Multiple-personality defense goes to high court

2000-02-21 Thread Jim Guinee
Multiple-personality defense goes to high court Associated Press EVERETT -- A sex offender's multiple-personality defense, barred by a trial judge and the state Supreme Court, is being taken before the U.S. Supreme Court with support from his victim, a woman who was his therapist in prison.

Re: the big question

2000-02-21 Thread Richard Pisacreta
Here's a question for you. This was asked by one of my Introductory Psychology students and thought I would pass it on to the list: What do you consider to be the biggest problem or challenge facing psychology today? Any thoughts? Rod Roderick D.

RE: Psychology's biggest challenge (long post)

2000-02-21 Thread Paul C. Smith
I wrote: I include the "fraud" comment because unfortunately (for parapsychological researchers), people like Geller and that guy in Canada with the radio show (Curly?). Unfortunately I left an important word out of this sentence. Let me just say that I meant to say that I included

psych book on paranormal

2000-02-21 Thread Gary Peterson
I notice that the apa has a new book out dealing with a variety of odd and paranormal experiences. I don't know if it has been reviewed yet, but from the names of the editors, my impression is that it will largely be composed of clinical anecdotes and discussion of hypnosis and dissociation.

Re: Hyponsis, hidden observer

2000-02-21 Thread Maxwell Gwynn
On Sun, 20 Feb 2000, Stephen Black wrote: On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Michael Sylvester wrote: while on this, did MTO [Martin Orne] coined the term "hidden observer"? No, it was Ernest Hilgard. Although I don't recall anything specific, I imagine Orne would not accepted such a construct.

EMDR Therapy

2000-02-21 Thread Jeffrey Nagelbush
According to the article below, APA has approved EMDR Therapy. I was wondering how strong the evidence for its effectiveness really is. Any info? Thanks, Jeff Nagelbush [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ferris State University Finger-flash therapy catches on February 21, 2000

EMDR Therapy

2000-02-21 Thread Stephen Black
On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Jeffrey Nagelbush wrote: According to the article below, APA has approved EMDR Therapy. I was wondering how strong the evidence for its effectiveness really is. Any info? If true, that is bad news for our declared aim of getting and keeping the pseudoscience out of

random/representative

2000-02-21 Thread Michael Sylvester
re sampling. Which is more important? to select a representative sample or a random sample. is a small representative sample better than a large random sample? Michael Sylvester Daytona Beach,Florida

Re: random/representative

2000-02-21 Thread Drnanjo
Listions, Wouldn't the answer to this one be "it depends"? If you are doing a controlled experiment involving an identified independent variable and intending to draw some type of causal conclusion then I would say random would be essential. If you are doing a survey or some other non- or

RE: random/representative

2000-02-21 Thread Paul C. Smith
What good would it do to have a random sample that wasn't representative? That makes no sense at all. Random sampling is simply a method for getting a representative sample. The question is like asking "Which is better, using a good hammer to build a roof that leaks, or having a roof that

RE: random/representative

2000-02-21 Thread Paul C. Smith
Nancy M. wrote Wouldn't the answer to this one be "it depends"? If you are doing a controlled experiment involving an identified independent variable and intending to draw some type of causal conclusion then I would say random would be essential. Agreed, but that's random