OOPS -Incomplete pronunciation summary

2000-10-23 Thread Beth Benoit
TIPSTERS, I'm so sorry - I just accidentally sent a partial summary of the "button" pronunciation. (Meant to "send later.") It's only partially complete, but more importantly, it's a mess. I intended to summarize and pare it down to a manageable size, etc. In the present state it's long and

Pronunciation of button summary

2000-10-23 Thread Beth Benoit
Title: Pronunciation of button summary Subj: Pronunciation question Date: 10/10/2000 5:53:09 PM Eastern Standard Time From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Beth Benoit) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (TIPS) There's a discussion going on in one of my classes on the pronunciation of buttons (the terminal neuron

efficacy studies

2000-10-23 Thread Chuck Huff
As part of a regular discussion series, my dept. is discussing John Horgan's screed against psychology: Horgan, J. (1999). The undiscovered mind: how the human brain defies replication, medication, and explanation. Psychological Science, 10(6), 470-474. I am singularly unimpressed with his

Re: efficacy studies

2000-10-23 Thread Gerald Peterson
Good idea for dept discussions! I think I would take more strongly the idea that psychology is pseudoscience--if only to argue as devil's advocate. As regards psychotherapy, what theory or knowledge base other than neuroscience has been shown to be efficacious? I presume the

Re: Request for info on statistics requirements

2000-10-23 Thread Sharon Carnahan
Hindsight is 20-20, but couldn't you co-develop a course with a title like "Statistics for the Social SCiences" and co-teach it for a while, until the Math folks felt better about it? After all you will probably use their tutoring services a bit. LIke most psych depts at 4 year schools, we

Re: efficacy studies

2000-10-23 Thread Bill McCown, Ph.D.
An alternative interpretation of existing situations that is compatible with much of what goes on at psychological conventions is that psychology may be scientific, but psychologists are not necessarily. And not just the clinicians. Science if by nature self correcting. It may just take much

Two questions about Likert scales

2000-10-23 Thread John W. Kulig
1. Do we measure on a LIE-KURT scale or a LICK-URT scale? 2. When using a Likert scale with adjective-modified anchors (as in "extremely pleasant" or "extremely bitter") - are we permitted to compare results between subjects/groups? or are we limited to within-subject comparisons? I have the

Re: Two questions about Likert scales

2000-10-23 Thread Kenneth M. Steele
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000 16:08:34 -0400 "John W. Kulig" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. Do we measure on a LIE-KURT scale or a LICK-URT scale? This depends on whether you are a (a)Michigan PhD, (b)pedant, (c)had met Rensis at a convention, or (d) some combination of the former. In that case, you