-1
I do not agree to this license for inclusion of ldap.jar in Tomcat 4.0
final.
124 -rw-rw-r-- 1 jon wheel 123717 Sep 17 19:36 ldap.jar
This is a similar license to the old Servlet API 2.0 license and I never
agreed to that one for inclusion in Jserv on pretty much the same
ccain 01/09/17 23:48:26
Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/mappers
SimpleMapper1.java
Log:
Typos ...
Revision ChangesPath
1.11 +5 -5
jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/mappers/SimpleMapper1.java
Index:
Excellent :-)
But where's the servlet API jar?
Kevin Jones
Developmentor
www.develop.com
-Original Message-
From: craigmcc@localhost [mailto:craigmcc@localhost]On Behalf Of Craig
R. McClanahan
Sent: 18 September 2001 04:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
There is no way in hell that I'm going agree to put the ASF (or myself) in a
position to take responsibility for any legal claims that come up as a
result of use of this .jar file. Carefully read supplemental section #2 (v).
Commenting here without
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3644.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Clere, Jean-Frederic wrote:
Hi,
I have patched mod_jk for TC4.0 so that the SSL Attributes follow the spec's
(SRV.4.7).
I have not found anything in the 2.2 spec's about it.
I have noted that the javax.servlet.cert.X509Certificate of TC3.3 is a String
not an array of
After digging some more into the code of it, I've realized that the
readFully() method is really hard to understand. So, unless there are
some substantial performance gains in the existing approach, maybe we
should go with something a bit simpler.
And just as a side note, you've probably noticed
I have found it the 2.2 Spec's (5.7 SSL Attributes).
Now I have started to fix Ajp13 in jakarta-tomcat so that it
follows the spec's.
For the moment I will only return the first certificate.
Returning the complete
chain is quite a lot of data and it is probably useless for
applications.
jfclere 01/09/18 05:29:30
Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/server Ajp13.java
Log:
Arrange javax.servlet.request.X509Certificate so that it follows the spec's
Note that it is only the first certificate of the chain.
Revision ChangesPath
1.27 +22 -1
Ignacio J. Ortega wrote:
I have found it the 2.2 Spec's (5.7 SSL Attributes).
Now I have started to fix Ajp13 in jakarta-tomcat so that it
follows the spec's.
For the moment I will only return the first certificate.
Returning the complete
chain is quite a lot of data and it is
Hi Bojan,
First, you're a commiter now, feel free to fix anything you see
broken :-)
Regarding this particular fix - it will not have a big performance
impact ( except for loading .class files, which happen once ).
However I would rather keep the old code and add comments -
reading a stream
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
It's official! The Servlet 2.3 and JSP 1.2 specifications are now final,
At the site for the specs
http://www.jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr053/
It looks like the actions on the forms are pointing to
an internal LAN name, ( webwork.eng ? ) so the
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote:
I have found it the 2.2 Spec's (5.7 SSL Attributes).
Now I have started to fix Ajp13 in jakarta-tomcat so that it
follows the spec's.
For the moment I will only return the first certificate.
Returning the complete
chain is quite a lot
[ ] A: Leave the build system as is
[ ] B: Make as many libraries as possible optional
[ ] C: Provide both, as discussed above; I'll volunteer to implement it
(but
of course, others can help)
I vote for B, and am willing to help with the coding/testing.
I would suggest that B be ammended
Hi,
We're having a discussion on the tomcat
(http://jakarta.apache.org/) developper mailing list on the
best location of some files. Could you please enlighten us ?
* should configuration for an /etc/rc script better be in
/etc or /etc/sysconfig (like RedHat and Mandrake do for
their own
+1 , and a comment on Readme.txt as is a spec compliance issue
Until we find a way to cache Client Certificate Chain..
Or we add 2 more messages in ajp13/14 - to get the chain when the user
request it.
In fact, even the client certificate should be retrieved only
on demand,
I assume most
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3617.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3617.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3617.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Jon Stevens wrote:
-1
I do not agree to this license for inclusion of ldap.jar in Tomcat 4.0
final.
124 -rw-rw-r-- 1 jon wheel 123717 Sep 17 19:36 ldap.jar
This is a similar license to the old Servlet API 2.0 license and I never
agreed to that one for inclusion in Jserv on
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
That something I've got in mind for ajp14, written on that
many times allready, with headers and miscs informations
to be asked by tomcat to web-server at getAttributes time
for example :
+1 ( but not before 3.3 is final ! )
Costin
Currently
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 21:25:33 -0700
From: Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tomcat-dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Compile errors
I'm trying to build off the tomcat-4.0 branch and it isn't working...
It seems that
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 21:51:27 -0700
From: Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tomcat-dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Another build problem...
on 9/17/01 9:40 PM, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Put Xalan 2
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Kevin Jones wrote:
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 08:36:55 +0100
From: Kevin Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Tomcat 4.0 Final Release
Excellent :-)
But where's the servlet API jar?
The
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
+1 , and a comment on Readme.txt as is a spec compliance issue
Until we find a way to cache Client Certificate Chain..
Or we add 2 more messages in ajp13/14 - to get the chain when the user
request it.
In fact, even the client certificate should be retrieved only
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 23:51:06 -0700
From: Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tomcat-dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: JCP Apache [EMAIL PROTECTED], Brian Behlendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on 9/18/01 2:31 AM, Brian Behlendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
There is no way in hell that I'm going agree to put the ASF (or myself) in a
position to take responsibility for any legal claims that come up as a
result of use of this .jar file. Carefully
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3695.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
One of the local changes I had to make to Tomcat in order to build with gcj is
in JspReader.java...
char[] getChars(Mark start, Mark stop) throws ParseException {
Mark oldstart = mark();
reset(start);
CharArrayWriter caw = new CharArrayWriter();
while
I love your flaming reaction Craig. You are trying to justify two wrongs
making a right or something.
on 9/18/01 9:09 AM, Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Coming from someone who bragged (at his ApacheCon London session on Turbine)
about not caring about violating license
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3649.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Javadocs). I see that I forgot to put up the binary distributions of
jakarta-servletapi-4; will do that in a sec.
That's what I meant - thanks
Kevin Jones
Developmentor
www.develop.com
-Original Message-
From: craigmcc@localhost [mailto:craigmcc@localhost]On Behalf Of Craig
R.
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Today, if you download (say) the 3.2 source tree and build it, in an
environment that doesn't have JSSE installed, the build script will
silently create a incomplete distribution for you, because it will
silently exclude building
Hello,
Congratulations for the final release of Tomcat3.3 and 4.
Both of them are the products by the enthusiastic efforts by Costin, Craig and all the
cool guys on this list.
I believe Tomcat will be (or already is) the de facto standard of Servlet/JSP server
implementation.
By the way, I
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3698.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3667.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3699.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 21:25:33 -0700
From: Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tomcat-dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Compile errors
I'm trying to build off the tomcat-4.0 branch and it isn't working...
It seems
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3704.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello again,
To make this kind of RC script available on also on Solaris
or other UNIX-like systems, I wrote some simple one.
I tested it with Tomcat 3.2.3 on Linux, and works well.
The trouble on RedHat 7.0 is reported to me.
/etc/rc on RedHat Linux sees if
/var/lock/subsys/tomcat
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3665.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Anthony,
AFAIK ( and I just checked the java lang spec ), a class (
CharArrayWriter) can override a method ( write ) and have fewer
throws declarations. It can't have _more_ exceptions.
CharArrayWriter.write() doesn't have any throw() declaration, so the code
seems correct.
We can add a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3707.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3695.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm01/09/18 15:28:57
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/naming Tag: tomcat_40_branch
NamingContext.java
Log:
- Fix bug 3699 - A recursive function call in org.apache.naming.NamingContext.
Patch submitted by ygary2 at yahoo.com (sorry I couldn't
remm01/09/18 15:30:01
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/naming NamingContext.java
Log:
- Fix bug 3699 - A recursive function call in org.apache.naming.NamingContext.
Patch submitted by ygary2 at yahoo.com (sorry I couldn't find your name anywhere).
Revision
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3699.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bojan,
First, you're a commiter now, feel free to fix anything you see
broken :-)
Didn't know it was official. Thanks!
Regarding this particular fix - it will not have a big performance
impact ( except for loading .class files, which happen once ).
However
Mike Anderson wrote:
+1
Keep up the good work Bojan!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/17/01 05:43AM
I would like to propose Bojan Smojver as a committer.
He has supplied a number of patches as well as done
useful testing. I think he would make good addition
to the Jakarta team.
Vote,
costin 01/09/18 16:24:46
Modified:.build.xml
src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler JspReader.java
src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/server Ajp13.java
src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/compat Jdk11Compat.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3708.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3709.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
This version should be more efficient and cleaner too.
Will do the old code with comments too.
Bojan
---
/home/groups/devel/jakarta/jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/depend/DependClassLoader.java
Mon Sep 17 11:51:16 2001
+++
rubys 01/09/18 18:28:34
Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/compat Jdk12Support.java
Log:
Fix what appears to be a minor oversight...
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +1 -0
jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/compat/Jdk12Support.java
Index:
Good suggestion, Craig. I've updated the list to include this.
I also incorporated all the other comments from the people who wrote
me. Glad to see the ajp13 issue is fixed in 3.2.3!
-jh-
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Jason,
One family of bugs you might want to include pertains to app
The current build system has gotten to be a mess (again) in the last few
months.
Jon,
I worked very hard every few days in this month to make my TC4 built
successfully May be I was the one who found more frustrated than you.
Although I see that there are active changes to the build
Minor patch, I think it is just a typo error
Punky
__
Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help?
Donate cash, emergency relief information
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/
build.properties.sample.patch
57 matches
Mail list logo
