[J-T-C] ajp13 works from jt to jtc ?

2001-09-26 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Hi to all, Did someone is planning to port ajp13 java changes done in TC 3.3 back to J-T-C ? If not I'll do it but I want to avoid duplicate works ... Regards - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD

Watchdog-4.0 PB

2001-09-26 Thread jean-frederic clere
Hi, I have a problem running watchdog: +++ servlet: execute: [java] Buildfile: conf/servlet-gtest.xml [java] [java] gtestservlet-test: [java] [java] Total time: 1 second [java] [gtest] Error setting project in class org.apache.tomcat.task.GTest [java]

%=x% expression syntax bug in XML jsp?

2001-09-26 Thread Uther, James
Hi All, My reading of ParserXJspSaxHandler.java suggests that the shorthand expression syntax for jsp1.3 xml documents (%=x%) is not handled in 'uninterpreted' tags (ie: tags that are not taglibs or jsp:). Is this a bug or per spec? My reading of the spec suggests it's a bug, but i could well

Re: Watchdog-4.0 PB

2001-09-26 Thread jean-frederic clere
Clere, Jean-Frederic wrote: Hi, I have a problem running watchdog: +++ servlet: execute: [java] Buildfile: conf/servlet-gtest.xml [java] [java] gtestservlet-test: [java] [java] Total time: 1 second [java] [gtest] Error setting project in class

RE: TC 3.3: getRequestURI()

2001-09-26 Thread Larry Isaacs
-Original Message- From: Bojan Smojver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:41 AM To: Tomcat Dev List Subject: TC 3.3: getRequestURI() The latest TC 3.3 CVS with its mod_jk, gives an encoded URI, together with the session ID on

Re: TC 3.3: getRequestURI()

2001-09-26 Thread jean-frederic clere
Larry Isaacs wrote: -Original Message- From: Bojan Smojver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:41 AM To: Tomcat Dev List Subject: TC 3.3: getRequestURI() The latest TC 3.3 CVS with its mod_jk, gives an encoded URI, together with the session

RE: TC 3.3: getRequestURI()

2001-09-26 Thread Keith Wannamaker
I'm not sure I understand why the session id was not also showing up with r-unparsed_uri. I'm doing some experimenting now.. Keith |/login/login.vm%3bjsessionid=q95pbsuof1 | Probably not. It's a side of effect of the last change which was | to use s-req_uri = ap_escape_uri(r-pool, r-uri);.

Re: tomcat hangging problem

2001-09-26 Thread joseph . vallot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My bet is that this is related with the VM/libraries. It can of course be a bug in tomcat, like a deadlock or something - but then it would fail on all SMP machines. I think like this. A strange thing I noticed yesterday: on hangging machines, running

RE: TC 3.3: getRequestURI()

2001-09-26 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
Probably will be the Session id interceptor that does not understand a encoded jsessionid, not in the mod_jk.. Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega -Mensaje original- De: Keith Wannamaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: miƩrcoles 26 de septiembre de 2001 16:55 Para: [EMAIL

Re: %=x% expression syntax bug in XML jsp?

2001-09-26 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Uther, James wrote: Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 14:30:21 +0300 From: Uther, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: %=x% expression syntax bug in XML jsp? Hi All, My reading of ParserXJspSaxHandler.java suggests that the

Re: TC 3.3: getRequestURI()

2001-09-26 Thread jean-frederic clere
Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: Probably will be the Session id interceptor that does not understand a encoded jsessionid, not in the mod_jk.. I was thinking that ap_escape_uri was changing ? into %3b and causing the problem... Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega -Mensaje original- De:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3815] - JspServlets produces NullPointerException

2001-09-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3815. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: %=x% expression syntax bug in XML jsp?

2001-09-26 Thread Mark Abbott
Hi Craig - I'm curious whether the expert group has discussed what might be done in the future about this unfortunate aspect of JSP. In what I would think would be a really common case in the future, where one wants to design an app using clean, readable, and purely XML templates (perhaps

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/valves ErrorReportValve.java LocalStrings.properties

2001-09-26 Thread remm
remm01/09/26 10:44:51 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/valves ErrorReportValve.java LocalStrings.properties Log: - Error report and dispatching refactoring. - New (and maybe fancier) error reports. - HTML code stolen from the Cocoon 2

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/valves ErrorDispatcherValve.java

2001-09-26 Thread remm
remm01/09/26 10:45:52 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/valves ErrorDispatcherValve.java Log: - Error report and dispatching refactoring. - The error page dispatching code is now located in this valve. Revision ChangesPath 1.2

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3841] New: - incorrect state reported by EmbeddedManager.java:start()

2001-09-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3841. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: TC 3.3: getRequestURI()

2001-09-26 Thread Bill Barker
I don't get this with RC1. From tomcat-log with debugging enabled for Sessions and Decode: 2001-09-26 11:04:29 - DecodeInterceptor: Before /index.jsp%3bjsessionid=xx7xdv3ca1 2001-09-26 11:04:29 - DecodeInterceptor: After /index.jsp;jsessionid=xx7xdv3ca1 2001-09-26 11:04:29 - SessionId: Url

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3779] - the value of jsp:param should be URL encoded

2001-09-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3779. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Tomcat 4.0 RPMs?

2001-09-26 Thread Vic Ricker
Hi. Will RPMs for Tomcat 4.0 be released on the web site any time soon? I have no problem installing from the tar but I'd prefer the RPM since that's how I installed the previous version. Thanks, -Vic

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardContextValve.java

2001-09-26 Thread remm
remm01/09/26 10:51:07 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardContextValve.java Log: - Error report and dispatching refactoring. - Remove some status report output code (everything is now done in one single place).

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core LocalStrings.properties LocalStrings_ja.properties

2001-09-26 Thread remm
remm01/09/26 10:51:52 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core LocalStrings.properties LocalStrings_ja.properties Log: - Move some strings to the valves package. Revision ChangesPath 1.38 +0 -42

RE: TC 3.3 Release Plan

2001-09-26 Thread Larry Isaacs
Hi David, I had hoped to get Tomcat 3.3 released prior to my up coming house closings and move. I won't be able to make this target, but hope to get Tomcat 3.3 to RC2 not too long after the move, perhaps around October 8. It is RC2 that I plan to propose for release and be voted on. The vote

RE: TC 3.3: getRequestURI()

2001-09-26 Thread Keith Wannamaker
Are you using mod_jk? | -Original Message- | From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] | Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:17 PM | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: Re: TC 3.3: getRequestURI() | | | I don't get this with RC1. From tomcat-log with debugging enabled for

Re: %=x% expression syntax bug in XML jsp?

2001-09-26 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Mark Abbott wrote: Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 10:43:51 -0700 From: Mark Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: %=x% expression syntax bug in XML jsp? Hi Craig - I'm curious whether the expert group has discussed what

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardHost.java

2001-09-26 Thread remm
remm01/09/26 11:00:09 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardHost.java Log: - Error report and dispatching refactoring. - The StandardHost will automatically add two valves on startup: the error page dispatcher valve, and an

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/tomcat-docs/config host.xml

2001-09-26 Thread remm
remm01/09/26 11:10:28 Modified:webapps/tomcat-docs/config host.xml Log: - Update docs on the new property for StandardHost. Revision ChangesPath 1.4 +11 -0 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/tomcat-docs/config/host.xml Index: host.xml

RE: TC 3.3 Release Plan

2001-09-26 Thread cmanolache
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Larry Isaacs wrote: Hi David, I had hoped to get Tomcat 3.3 released prior to my up coming house closings and move. I won't be able to make this target, but hope to get Tomcat 3.3 to RC2 not too long after the move, perhaps around October 8. It is RC2 that I plan to

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/examples build.xml

2001-09-26 Thread remm
remm01/09/26 11:49:08 Modified:.Tag: tomcat_40_branch BUILDING.txt build.properties.sample build.xml catalina Tag: tomcat_40_branch build.xml webapps/examples Tag: tomcat_40_branch build.xml Log: - Port the new buid

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup EmbeddedManager.java

2001-09-26 Thread remm
remm01/09/26 11:55:40 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup EmbeddedManager.java Log: - If embedded.start() fails, the state would be incorrect. Thanks to Toby Cabot (toby at caboteria.org) for the patch. Revision Changes

Re: TC 3.3: getRequestURI()

2001-09-26 Thread Bill Barker
Yes. - Original Message - From: Keith Wannamaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:57 AM Subject: RE: TC 3.3: getRequestURI() Are you using mod_jk? | -Original Message- | From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] | Sent:

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup EmbeddedManager.java

2001-09-26 Thread remm
remm01/09/26 11:56:29 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup Tag: tomcat_40_branch EmbeddedManager.java Log: - If embedded.start() fails, the state would be incorrect. Thanks to Toby Cabot (toby at caboteria.org) for the patch.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3841] - incorrect state reported by EmbeddedManager.java:start()

2001-09-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3841. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[PATCH] Potential buffer overflow attach in mod_jk

2001-09-26 Thread Bill Barker
While checking to see how mod_jk handled the ;jsessionid= in the URL, I was horrified to see how easily it would be to take control of the server with a relatively small buffer overflow. I'm not really an Apache person, so I'm certain that this can be improved on. ** This message is

Fw: [PATCH] Potential buffer overflow attach in mod_jk

2001-09-26 Thread Bill Barker
Urm, let's try that again with a patch that at least compiles.. - Original Message - From: Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:30 AM Subject: [PATCH] Potential buffer overflow attach in mod_jk While checking to see how mod_jk

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3704] - forward errors not reported

2001-09-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3704. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: [PATCH] Potential buffer overflow attach in mod_jk

2001-09-26 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
I think we need Bill Barker Kin-Man Chung aboard already.. if we dont want to have more work that we already have integrating their patches.. Next can change subject and call this a vote about giving them committer access ASAP :) Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega -Mensaje original- De:

RE: TC 3.3 Release Plan

2001-09-26 Thread Larry Isaacs
I will update the RELEASE-PLAN-3.3 tonight to say the RC2 freeze date is Oct 6 to provide for the nomal delay between tagging CVS and posting the release. Since there isn't a freeze date involved with the final, I can prepare the release a little ahead of time, so I'll keep this as Oct 15'th.

Re: TC 3.3 + mod_jk + j_security_check

2001-09-26 Thread Bojan Smojver
I was referring to the manual configuration, rather then ApacheConfig one. Some people (me :-) prefer to do things manually. I actually tried with /*.jsp (or /*.vm in my case) only and it (still) doesn't work (which makes sense and I don't consider it a problem) unless you specify: JkMount

Tomcat next

2001-09-26 Thread Dave Oxley
Hi all, A couple of questions on future Tomcat releases: 1. Will there be a TC3.4 release or is 3.x obsolete after 3.3? 2. Has TC4.0 been branched (i.e. has development started on TC4.1 or are you waiting for TC4.0.1 to branch?) 3. Is there a list of planned features for TC4.1? Dave [EMAIL

Re: TC 3.3 + mod_jk + j_security_check

2001-09-26 Thread cmanolache
On Thu, 27 Sep 2001, Bojan Smojver wrote: I was referring to the manual configuration, rather then ApacheConfig one. Some people (me :-) prefer to do things manually. I actually tried with /*.jsp (or /*.vm in my case) only and it (still) doesn't work (which makes sense and I don't consider

RE: [PATCH] Potential buffer overflow attach in mod_jk

2001-09-26 Thread cmanolache
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: I think we need Bill Barker Kin-Man Chung aboard already.. if we dont want to have more work that we already have integrating their patches.. Next can change subject and call this a vote about giving them committer access ASAP :) +1 :-)

Re: [PATCH] Potential buffer overflow attach in mod_jk

2001-09-26 Thread Andy Armstrong
+1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: I think we need Bill Barker Kin-Man Chung aboard already.. if we dont want to have more work that we already have integrating their patches.. Next can change subject and call this a vote about giving them

Re: Tomcat next

2001-09-26 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Dave Oxley wrote: Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 22:59:55 +0100 From: Dave Oxley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat next Hi all, A couple of questions on future Tomcat releases: 1. Will there be a TC3.4 release or is 3.x

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/native/mod_jk/common jk_uri_worker_map.c

2001-09-26 Thread larryi
larryi 01/09/26 15:30:10 Modified:src/native/mod_jk/common jk_uri_worker_map.c Log: Patch for buffer overflow problem. Submitted by: Bill Barker Revision ChangesPath 1.6 +7 -5 jakarta-tomcat/src/native/mod_jk/common/jk_uri_worker_map.c Index:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3844] New: - Headers added to HttpServletResponse not ignored by container after call to sendError() or sendRedirect()

2001-09-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3844. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3844] - Headers added to HttpServletResponse not ignored by container after call to sendError() or sendRedirect()

2001-09-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3844. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Tomcat next

2001-09-26 Thread cmanolache
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Dave Oxley wrote: Hi all, A couple of questions on future Tomcat releases: 1. Will there be a TC3.4 release or is 3.x obsolete after 3.3? AFAIK there is no plan for a 3.4 release after 3.3 - that doesn't mean 3.x will be obsolete, just that the core is now stable and

Re: Tomcat next

2001-09-26 Thread brian moseley
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: What would *you* like to see happen? (And what would *you* like to work on to make it happen? :-). did you see my message about virtual host support for authenticators and realms? :) i will likely be able to put some time into it in the near

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3591] - HttpServletResponse.sendError() and sendRedirect() should commit the response

2001-09-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3591. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina build.xml

2001-09-26 Thread craigmcc
craigmcc01/09/26 15:49:27 Modified:catalina build.xml Log: Copy all static resource files, not just *.properties, into catalina.jar. Revision ChangesPath 1.68 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/build.xml Index: build.xml

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3845] New: - Body content is supposed to be empty

2001-09-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3845. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardContext.java

2001-09-26 Thread remm
remm01/09/26 16:07:54 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardContext.java Log: - Create the Jasper loader in delegating mode (may prevent trouble). Revision ChangesPath 1.80 +5 -4

Re: TC 3.3: getRequestURI()

2001-09-26 Thread Bojan Smojver
Keith Wannamaker wrote: 0x3b = ';'. Ignacio is right, SessionID doesn't remove the id because it is not expecting ; to be encoded. So now it shows up in the URI and has the side effect of breaking sessions that depend on url rewriting. But, the spec does say the URL should be encoded,

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardContext.java

2001-09-26 Thread remm
remm01/09/26 16:17:52 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core Tag: tomcat_40_branch StandardContext.java Log: - Create the Jasper loader in delegating mode (may prevent trouble). Revision ChangesPath No revision

Re: Tomcat next

2001-09-26 Thread Remy Maucherat
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Dave Oxley wrote: Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 22:59:55 +0100 From: Dave Oxley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat next Hi all, A couple of questions on future Tomcat releases: 1. Will there be a TC3.4 release

RE: TC 3.3: getRequestURI()

2001-09-26 Thread cmanolache
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Keith Wannamaker wrote: 0x3b = ';'. Ignacio is right, SessionID doesn't remove the id because it is not expecting ; to be encoded. So now it shows up in the URI and has the side effect of breaking sessions that depend on url rewriting. But, the spec does say the URL

Re: Tomcat next

2001-09-26 Thread cmanolache
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Remy Maucherat wrote: What would *you* like to see happen? (And what would *you* like to work on to make it happen? :-). Cleaning up and modularizing the current 4.0 is probably the most important thing to happen before any more features are added, and that's what I

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 177] - Race condition during servlet initialization BugRat Report#244

2001-09-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: [PATCH] Potential buffer overflow attach in mod_jk

2001-09-26 Thread Keith Wannamaker
Hi Bill, would you resubmit a patch that makes use of either Apache or jk's pools? ie ap_strdup or jk_pool_strdup. That would be a better way to solve the problem. Apache modules should and do avoid os memory-allocation routines like the plague. I think uw_map-p would be ok, but please do some

Re: TC 3.3: getRequestURI()

2001-09-26 Thread Bojan Smojver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Keith Wannamaker wrote: 0x3b = ';'. Ignacio is right, SessionID doesn't remove the id because it is not expecting ; to be encoded. So now it shows up in the URI and has the side effect of breaking sessions that depend on url rewriting.

RE: TC 3.3: getRequestURI()

2001-09-26 Thread Keith Wannamaker
I'm +1 for this. It is the best solution. Keith | -Original Message- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] | | 3. Revert to the use of uri ( i.e. the decoded uri ), and | change the getRequestURI ( the facade ) to generated a | 'canonical' encoding. | Problems:

Hard coding HTML within Catalina...

2001-09-26 Thread Jon Stevens
on 9/26/01 10:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +sb.append(htmlheadtitle); +sb.append(Globals.SERVER_INFO).append( - ); +sb.append(sm.getString(errorReportValve.errorReport)); +sb.append(/title); +sb.append(STYLE!--H1{font-family :

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3727] - Switched included request parameters

2001-09-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3727. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3727] - Switched included request parameters

2001-09-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3727. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Hard coding HTML within Catalina...

2001-09-26 Thread Remy Maucherat
on 9/26/01 10:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +sb.append(htmlheadtitle); +sb.append(Globals.SERVER_INFO).append( - ); +sb.append(sm.getString(errorReportValve.errorReport)); +sb.append(/title); +sb.append(STYLE!--H1{font-family

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3847] New: - Apache authorization headers not passed through to servlet

2001-09-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3847. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Tomcat next

2001-09-26 Thread Bojan Smojver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Having a stable core is essential for module development and for enhancing the current set of modules. Even if there are many improvements we can add to 3.3, I believe the benefit of keeping 3.3 stable is far bigger. Just to confirm this point, I've been running 3.3

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina Globals.java

2001-09-26 Thread remm
remm01/09/26 17:54:11 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina Globals.java Log: - Update version number. Revision ChangesPath 1.40 +5 -5 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/Globals.java Index: Globals.java

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina Response.java

2001-09-26 Thread remm
remm01/09/26 17:55:09 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina Response.java Log: - Add new recycle facade method, which is used by the core to recycle (uncommit) the response facade object. Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +10 -4

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector HttpResponseFacade.java ResponseFacade.java

2001-09-26 Thread remm
remm01/09/26 17:58:14 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector HttpResponseFacade.java ResponseFacade.java Log: - The response facade now have its own committed flag, so that the application layer can be committed (during a

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector HttpResponseBase.java ResponseBase.java

2001-09-26 Thread remm
remm01/09/26 17:58:38 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector HttpResponseBase.java ResponseBase.java Log: - Recycle the facades between each request. Revision ChangesPath 1.38 +12 -4

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/valves ErrorDispatcherValve.java

2001-09-26 Thread remm
remm01/09/26 18:00:05 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/valves ErrorDispatcherValve.java Log: - The error dispatcher will recycle the facades before forwarding to an error page (of course, if the underlying response has been committed,

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/valves ErrorReportValve.java

2001-09-26 Thread remm
remm01/09/26 18:01:10 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/valves ErrorReportValve.java Log: - The error report valve should use the internal response object to ignore the commit state of the facade. Revision ChangesPath 1.3

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3591] - HttpServletResponse.sendError() and sendRedirect() should commit the response

2001-09-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3591. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3823] - sendError and setStatus clear headers already set

2001-09-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3823. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [PATCH] Potential buffer overflow attach in mod_jk

2001-09-26 Thread Bill Barker
Here's with jk_pool_strdup (against RC1, not HEAD). It looked to me like uw_map-p wasn't suitable for per-request allocations (i.e. it would just eat memory until the server was re-started), and since this is in common, I couldn't use ap_strdup since that breaks all non-Apache servers. -

Re: Tomcat next

2001-09-26 Thread Punky Tse
AFAIK there is no plan for a 3.4 release after 3.3 - that doesn't mean 3.x will be obsolete, just that the core is now stable and unlikely to change, except bugfixes. Having a stable core is essential for module development and for enhancing the current set of modules. Even if there are

[VOTE] Kin-Man Chung and William Barker for Tomcat Committer Status

2001-09-26 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
I'd like to follow up on Nacho's (good) suggestion that we add William Barker and Kin-Man Chung as committers on Tomcat. They've both been providing invaluable assistance and patches. I'm +1 on them. Craig

Re: [VOTE] Kin-Man Chung and William Barker for Tomcat Committer Status

2001-09-26 Thread Remy Maucherat
I'd like to follow up on Nacho's (good) suggestion that we add William Barker and Kin-Man Chung as committers on Tomcat. They've both been providing invaluable assistance and patches. I'm +1 on them. +1 Remy

Re: [VOTE] Kin-Man Chung and William Barker for Tomcat Committer Status

2001-09-26 Thread Amy Roh
+1 Amy Craig R. McClanahan wrote: I'd like to follow up on Nacho's (good) suggestion that we add William Barker and Kin-Man Chung as committers on Tomcat. They've both been providing invaluable assistance and patches. I'm +1 on them. Craig

Re: Tomcat next

2001-09-26 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Implementing a nice administration/configuration interface (as a web app), talking to server components through a JMX interface (so that Tomcat can be managed by any JMX compliant tool). Some time ago I published some functional requirements

Re: Tomcat next

2001-09-26 Thread Pier Fumagalli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is not yet decided how we'll release the new modules, but the main idea is to keep the 'base' version as small and clean as possible, and all features to be 'add-ons', outside of the base distribution, and have only bug fixes in 3.3.x-releases.

Re: Tomcat next

2001-09-26 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually, I would be more in favor of releasing a 4.1 before that, focusing mostly on small refactorings of the core (like the error report refactoring I just did) and optimizations. More specifically, that would include: - the Service stuff (if

RE: [PATCH] Potential buffer overflow attach in mod_jk

2001-09-26 Thread Keith Wannamaker
I was afraid of that... guess os memory allocation it is, then. Keith | It looked to me like | uw_map-p wasn't suitable for per-request allocations (i.e. it would just | eat memory until the server was re-started), and since this is in common, I | couldn't use ap_strdup since that breaks all

Re: Watchdog-4.0 PB

2001-09-26 Thread cmanolache
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote: [java] /home/jakarta/jakarta-watchdog-4.0/dist/conf/servlet-gtest.xml:22: java.lang.NoSuchMethodException [java] Java Result: 1 BUILD SUCCESSFUL Total time: 2 seconds +++ I am using ant-1.4. Yes, something changed in ant-1.4 and

Re: [VOTE] Kin-Man Chung and William Barker for Tomcat CommitterStatus

2001-09-26 Thread cmanolache
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: I'd like to follow up on Nacho's (good) suggestion that we add William Barker and Kin-Man Chung as committers on Tomcat. They've both been providing invaluable assistance and patches. I'm +1 on them. I already sent a +1, but since there are

Re: Watchdog-4.0 PB

2001-09-26 Thread Forrest R. Girouard
jean-frederic clere wrote: Hi, I have a problem running watchdog: +++ servlet: execute: [java] Buildfile: conf/servlet-gtest.xml [java] [java] gtestservlet-test: [java] [java] Total time: 1 second [java] [gtest] Error setting project in class

Share sessions in JSP and Servlets

2001-09-26 Thread Stefan Berg
Hi, I have just set up my first Tomcat installation. Under webapps, I have defined a context mycontext. Within this there is a dir for my JSP's called jsp. Like this: /mycontext/jsp/mypage.jsp From the JSP page, I post a form to my servlet myservlet placed in a WEB-INF/classes dir. Like