manveen 02/04/08 19:56:57
Modified:webapps/admin/valve accessLogValve.jsp
Added: webapps/admin/valve requestDumperValve.jsp
Log:
Added request dumper valve page.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/admin/valve/accessLogValve.jsp
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Larry Isaacs wrote:
It's not so much having one util jar, but understanding the differences
between jakarta-tomcat-connectors' tomcat-util.jar and connectors_util.jar.
If they are the same, then I would prefer to use a single name.
They are certainly not the same ( or
manveen 02/04/08 19:58:46
Added: webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin/valve
RequestDumperValveForm.java
Log:
Addes form bean for the request dumper valve page.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
I'd like those two to stay the way they are. They're not related to the
hooks or actions. I/O should be handled as a special case IMO; faster +
simpler. (could you remove the comments ?)
Ok, but at least add a second parameter ( Request,
remm02/04/09 01:59:48
Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java
Log:
- Remove tabs.
- Add some comments.
- Passing the request as an argument is useless (at least for the HTTP/1.1
processor), since there's a 1 - 1
billbarker02/04/09 00:00:10
Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java
Log:
Actually implement RemoteHost lookup in the processor.
Revision ChangesPath
1.17 +5 -1
billbarker02/04/08 21:33:53
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat3
CoyoteInterceptor2.java
Log:
Do a correct check if the request is for a SSL attribute.
The lookup is way too expensive to do it when it isn't needed.
Revision Changes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My first idea is to add makeRoot() in jk_ws_service_t. But I have the problem
that apache needs a pool (not a jk_pool) to call ap_server_root_relative().
Where could I get the pool?
Actually, that would be a good idea
billbarker02/04/09 00:02:53
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat3
Tomcat3Request.java
Log:
Tie into the backend remoteAddr remoteHost lookup.
The duplicates are ugly, but until we can safely stop the agressive recycling, they
provide huge
billbarker02/04/09 00:03:53
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat3
Tomcat3Request.java
Log:
Fix Typo.
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +1 -1
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat3/Tomcat3Request.java
remm02/04/09 02:23:13
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4 CoyoteRequest.java
Log:
- Use the action to have the protocol handler compute the remote host.
Revision ChangesPath
1.18 +12 -11
remm02/04/09 02:23:40
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote ActionCode.java
Log:
- Coding style cleanup.
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +8 -3
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/ActionCode.java
Index: ActionCode.java
remm02/04/09 02:27:12
Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java
Log:
- Add comments.
- It seems to me that getting the remote host is expensive, while getting the
remote address is super cheap (I don't even think it
billbarker02/04/08 21:18:02
Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java
Log:
Make the SSL attributes functional (at least until we can do better).
We still need the KeySize to be added to SSLSupport, but I'm leaving that for
billbarker02/04/08 21:23:04
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat3
CoyoteInterceptor2.java
Log:
Hook-up the SSL attributes to the back-end.
This should work reasonably well across connectors.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +10 -2
manveen 02/04/08 18:55:24
jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin/valve - New
directory
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
manveen 02/04/08 18:56:15
Added: webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin/valve
AccessLogForm.java
Log:
Form bean for Access log valve page.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
manveen 02/04/08 18:58:42
Added: webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin/valve
AccessLogValveForm.java
Removed: webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin/valve
AccessLogForm.java
Log:
rename
remm02/04/09 03:22:17
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4 CoyoteRequest.java
Log:
- RequestHost and requestAddr must be recycled.
Revision ChangesPath
1.19 +6 -4
Hi to all,
You could find the Apache 2.0.35 rpm for Linux at :
http://ftp.falsehope.com/home/gomez/apache2/
apache2-2.0.35-1.src.rpm
apache2-2.0.35-1.i386.rpm
apache2-devel-2.0.35-1.i386.rpm
apache2-manual-2.0.35-1.i386.rpm
There are signed with my PGP key (the same used
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7861.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7863.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 2:50 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat build.xml
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Larry Isaacs wrote:
It's not so much having one util jar, but
Hi,
Does current Tomcat 4 implement all requirements of
Servlet specification 2.3 and JSP specification 1.2?
Thanks.
Hugh
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
tomcat_util.jar ( in container ) has all of the tools.
The instructions for installing Coyote on Tomcat 3.3.x say to
replace connectors_util.jar with j-t-c's tomcat-utils.jar. Since
I plan to include Coyote in Tomcat 3.3.2 distribution, then
the util jar we ship in common loader must remain
This email is autogenerated from the output from:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-04-09/jakarta-tomcat.html
Buildfile: build.xml
detect:
msg.jdk12:
[echo] Detected JDK1.2
glenn 02/04/09 05:53:45
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector
HttpRequestBase.java
Log:
Fix for a bug where parseParameters() could go into an infinite loop
trying to read the HTTP Request POST content if the content sent was
less
glenn 02/04/09 06:19:20
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector
LocalStrings.properties
Log:
Fix for a bug where parseParameters() could go into an infinite loop
trying to read the HTTP Request POST content if the content sent was
glenn 02/04/09 06:27:29
Modified:webapps/tomcat-docs/config jk.xml
Log:
Add a note about 1 to 1 httpd to processor mapping with Apache
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +4 -0 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/tomcat-docs/config/jk.xml
Index: jk.xml
glenn 02/04/09 06:29:10
Modified:webapps/tomcat-docs/config Tag: tomcat_40_branch ajp.xml
Log:
Add a note about 1 to 1 httpd to processor mapping with Apache
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.2.2.8 +4
glenn 02/04/09 06:29:37
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector Tag:
tomcat_40_branch HttpRequestBase.java
LocalStrings.properties
Log:
Fix for a bug where parseParameters() could go into an infinite loop
trying
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/index.html
Tomcat 4.0.x. Tomcat 4.0.3 is the current production quality release.
Tomcat 4.0 is the next generation of Tomcat. The 4.0 servlet container
(Catalina) has been developed from the ground up for flexibility and
performance. Version 4.0 implements
Ok... I'm facing this little problem... I have a servlet creating a RMI
registry, and that binds to a port, creates a non-daemon Thread...
Yadayadayada... You know where I want to end up to...
Now, catalina.sh stop doesn't work anymore, because I found no apparent
way
of shutting down that
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7873.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7873.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Ok, ok. I'll work around it.
Costin
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
I'd like those two to stay the way they are. They're not related to the
hooks or actions. I/O should be handled as a special case IMO; faster +
simpler.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7873.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
As you noticed, we will use coyote for connector and avoid
the duplication. There are few more things that need to be
fixed, but it seems everything will actually work better.
I still like the idea of packing the connector as a
webapp and doing all config in web.xml - but having
more
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7873.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7873.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Ok, ok. I'll work around it.
No need to. You didn't make your intentions known, and I assumed that you
had in mind changes in the HTTP/1.1 connector, which I considered to be a
bad idea.
So since it's been cleared, +1 for adding Request and Response as a
parameter to the methods in InputBuffer
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7873.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7880.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Larry Isaacs wrote:
The instructions for installing Coyote on Tomcat 3.3.x say to
replace connectors_util.jar with j-t-c's tomcat-utils.jar. Since
j-t-c tomcat-utils are a subset of tomcat-utils.jar from container/
Sorry, I didn't read the instructions for Coyote - I'm
costin 02/04/09 10:13:51
Modified:jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkCoyoteHandler.java
Log:
Implement the input buffer.
Recycle the req/res ( coyote http adapter doesn't call recycle on
coyoteRequest/coyoteResponse - which is actually a very good idea ).
Add a workaround
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Larry Isaacs wrote:
The instructions for installing Coyote on Tomcat 3.3.x say to
replace connectors_util.jar with j-t-c's tomcat-utils.jar. Since
j-t-c tomcat-utils are a subset of tomcat-utils.jar from container/
Sorry, I didn't read the instructions for Coyote -
costin 02/04/09 10:23:49
Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java
Log:
If host header is not set, use the local socket to set the local port
and hostname.
Remy - I'm not sure if this is correct, but I see no other way to
costin 02/04/09 10:26:07
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4
CoyoteResponse.java
Log:
Remy, I think response.finish() must be called - otherwise
we get no COMMIT callback. I put a workaround in ajp, but if this is
correct behavior it's
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat build.xml
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Larry Isaacs wrote:
The instructions for installing Coyote on
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 1:15 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat build.xml
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Larry Isaacs wrote:
The instructions for installing Coyote on Tomcat
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat build.xml
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Larry Isaacs wrote:
The instructions for installing Coyote on
costin 02/04/09 10:26:07
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4
CoyoteResponse.java
Log:
Remy, I think response.finish() must be called - otherwise
we get no COMMIT callback. I put a workaround in ajp, but if this is
correct behavior
remm02/04/09 10:47:07
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4
CoyoteConnector2.java
Added: coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4
CoyoteServerSocketFactory.java
Log:
- Add a socket factory to allow
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
public class CoyoteResponse
@@ -485,6 +485,7 @@
throws IOException {
// Writing leftover bytes
outputBuffer.close();
+coyoteResponse.finish();
}
This is called no matter what right
costin 02/04/09 10:57:13
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote InputBuffer.java
Log:
Added (another) piece of comment ( after hunting for NPEs :-)
The way InputBuffer is used is different from OutputBuffer - the param
is empty, the byte[]. The protocol is supposed to
it looks to be even worse
for url-parrern: /webdav/*
i've found:
PROPFIND /context/webdav HTTP/1.1 207 1904
and
PROPFIND /context/webdav/aaa HTTP/1.1 404 585
while webdav exists only in / of webapplication
and there is also aaa directory inside the webdav (/webdav/aaa)
regards,
Szymon
--
To
remm02/04/09 10:59:42
Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java
Log:
- Modify Costin's patch:
- In HTTP/1.1, we must default to the protocol's default (spec requirement);
this was fixed recently (bug 6668)
- In
costin 02/04/09 11:02:19
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat3
Tomcat3Request.java
Log:
Merged few more methods from ajp.
Use the same buffer for addresses, pass the info to Coyote Request
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +56 -0
costin 02/04/09 10:57:13
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote InputBuffer.java
Log:
Added (another) piece of comment ( after hunting for NPEs :-)
The way InputBuffer is used is different from OutputBuffer - the param
is empty, the byte[]. The protocol is supposed
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
public class CoyoteResponse
@@ -485,6 +485,7 @@
throws IOException {
// Writing leftover bytes
outputBuffer.close();
+coyoteResponse.finish();
}
This is called no matter
I'll commit a fix.
Larry, is it ok if we call the buildfile for j-t-c from 3.3's build.xml ?
( 4.0 is doing that too ).
The problem is the order which may be tricky - tomcat33 depends on j-t-c
utils and it will copy coyote. But coyote depens on tomcat33 beeing build,
so it can find the
costin 02/04/09 11:15:21
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote InputBuffer.java
OutputBuffer.java
Log:
Added a second parameter allowing IB and OB to be implemented stateless
( or statefull, depending on the rest of the code )
I'll add the extra
costin 02/04/09 11:19:27
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote Request.java Response.java
Log:
Add the second param in calling.
The tomcat3 and 4 adapters are calling the request and response methods, it
doesn't seem to be any other place to depend on this ( except the
remm02/04/09 11:21:23
Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java InternalOutputBuffer.java
Log:
- Add some code to prevent problems when calling finish or commit twice.
Revision ChangesPath
1.22 +3 -0
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 3:11 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat build.xml
I'll commit a fix.
Larry, is it ok if we call the buildfile for j-t-c from 3.3's
costin 02/04/09 11:35:54
Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 InputFilter.java
InternalInputBuffer.java InternalOutputBuffer.java
OutputFilter.java
http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/filters
costin 02/04/09 11:37:24
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat3
CoyoteInterceptor.java CoyoteInterceptor2.java
CoyoteProcessor.java CoyoteRequest.java
CoyoteResponse.java Tomcat3Adapter.java
costin 02/04/09 10:23:49
Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java
Log:
If host header is not set, use the local socket to set the local port
and hostname.
Remy - I'm not sure if this is correct, but I see no other
costin 02/04/09 11:43:11
Removed: jk/java/org/apache/jk/server/tomcat33/config
ApacheConfig.java BaseJkConfig.java IISConfig.java
NSConfig.java
Log:
Removed duplicated config.
mod_jk2 will use a different syntax and a single
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
BTW, this is a very cool idea - it avoids one copy and allocations,
and simplifies the code. But it deserves a comment :-).
Yes, indeed. I worked hard so that there wouldn't be any useless copy.
Yes, excelent !.
One question for future
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
( this used to be in the 3.3-specific code, and is needed to construct
redirects, etc )
+//The info from socket is usually acurate
+// req.setServerPort(80);
That's not good. If no host is specified with
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Can you add a small comment in Response and clearly indicate who should
call it - I'm fine with any, but we should do it consistenlty in the 2
adapters and in the 2 protocols.
The class which is implementing the Adapter interface is calling it
+
+remoteAddrMB = coyoteRequest.remoteAddr();
+ remoteHostMB = coyoteRequest.remoteHost();
+ serverNameMB = coyoteRequest.serverName();
+
+
This forces the lookup to always be per-request, when it would be much nicer
to do it per-connection.
+
+public void
costin 02/04/09 12:33:43
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
As discussed on tomcat-dev, place j-t-c/tomcat-utils.jar in common,
rename the old one to container-utils.
Call the ant files for j-t-c to build and clean
Revision ChangesPath
1.169 +53 -31
costin 02/04/09 12:34:20
Modified:src/etc modules.xml
Log:
Add CoyoteInterceptor2.
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +2 -0 jakarta-tomcat/src/etc/modules.xml
Index: modules.xml
===
RCS file:
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Can you add a small comment in Response and clearly indicate who
should
call it - I'm fine with any, but we should do it consistenlty in the 2
adapters and in the 2 protocols.
The class which is implementing the Adapter interface is calling
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
( this used to be in the 3.3-specific code, and is needed to
construct
redirects, etc )
+//The info from socket is usually acurate
+// req.setServerPort(80);
That's not good. If no host is specified with
costin 02/04/09 12:43:27
Modified:src/etc server.xml
Log:
Changed to CoyoteInterceptor2. ( after we are comfortable with it, we'll
rename it to CoyoteInterceptor )
Added the commented out impl of Coyte-based jk.
Revision ChangesPath
1.97 +8 -2
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Bill Barker wrote:
+
+remoteAddrMB = coyoteRequest.remoteAddr();
+ remoteHostMB = coyoteRequest.remoteHost();
+ serverNameMB = coyoteRequest.serverName();
+
+
This forces the lookup to always be per-request, when it would be much nicer
to
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
port if it is not the standard one.
But if the Host header is correct, it'll allways be the same thing as
the getPort on socket - if it's https on standard port, the port will
be 443 as the default, etc.
Even if the port in the host header
I've been trying to get JAAS capabilities to work (JDK 1.4.0, Tomcat 4.0.1,
4.0.3, Solaris 8) and am getting odd (and unsatisfactory) results. Is there
any reference that identifies if JAAS should work under Tomcat 4.0.x?
BTW, I get different behavior between 4.0.1 and 4.0.3 with the same
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
port if it is not the standard one.
But if the Host header is correct, it'll allways be the same thing as
the getPort on socket - if it's https on standard port, the port will
be 443 as the default, etc.
Even if the port in the host
costin 02/04/09 13:15:09
Removed: jk/java/org/apache/jk/server/tomcat33 JkConfig33.java
JkRequest33.java JkResponse33.java JkServlet33.java
Worker33.java
Log:
Removed the old connector, use Coyote instead.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
costin 02/04/09 13:16:54
Removed: jk/java/org/apache/jk/server/tomcat40/config
ApacheConfig.java BaseJkConfig.java IISConfig.java
NSConfig.java
Log:
Removed the duplicate config.
We'll use the one in ajp for mod_jk1, a different
costin 02/04/09 13:17:47
Removed: jk/java/org/apache/jk/server/tomcat40 JkConfig40.java
JkConnector.java JkRequest40.java JkResponse40.java
LocalStrings.properties Worker40.java
Log:
Removed the duplicated tomcat4 connector. We'll
costin 02/04/09 13:19:53
Modified:jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkCoyoteHandler.java
Log:
Update to the stateless-enabled Input/OutputBuffer interfaces.
Clean up the code ( jk2 is mostly stateless )
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +42 -58
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat3
Tomcat3Request.java
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Bill Barker wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7891.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Yes, that's what the fixed patch does.
So I did it right, I think :)
Thanks.
Costin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7891.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
costin 02/04/09 13:39:06
Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf C2BConverter.java
Log:
Backward-compatible change to C2BConverter.
Needed by jk - this would avoid duplicating the code.
The duplicated class was needed to allow jk to work with unmodified
versions of
costin 02/04/09 13:39:38
Removed: jk/java/org/apache/jk/util C2B.java
Log:
Remove the duplicated class.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
costin 02/04/09 13:40:44
Modified:jk/java/org/apache/jk/common JkInputStream.java
jk/java/org/apache/jk/core JkHandler.java
jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkCoyoteHandler.java
Log:
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +10 -0
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Bill Barker wrote:
Unless I'm missing something.
These fields are recycled per-request, so we lose the value of
remoteHost/remoteAddr and will have to look it up again. If the buffers are
identical, then the o.a.c.Request field is recycled as well. At least for
Bill,
Do you think we can move to CoyoteInterceptor2 and Protocol ?
It seems to be working for both http and ajp - it is still
less stable than your original one, but I think we're close.
Your call.
Costin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
remm02/04/09 13:51:06
Modified:jk/java/org/apache/jk/common JkInputStream.java
jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkCoyoteHandler.java
Log:
- Remove old package from imports.
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +0 -1
jfclere 02/04/09 13:57:19
Modified:jk/native2 build.xml
Log:
Add unless HAVE_APR to compile it without APR.
Revision ChangesPath
1.17 +2 -0 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/build.xml
Index: build.xml
jfclere 02/04/09 14:00:38
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_config.c jk_workerEnv.c
jk/native2/server/apache13 mod_jk2.c
Log:
Add $(serverRoot) handling for apache13 and jk_config.c (it cores when
modifying the value parameter (in the read only part of executable).
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat3
Tomcat3Request.java
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Bill Barker wrote:
I'm +1 for this. But for at least a little while, I'd rather just deprecate
CoyoteInterceptor and related classes.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 1:48 PM
Subject: CoyoteInterceptor2
Bill,
Do
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
