#ifdef AS400
fp = fopen(workerFile, w, o_ccsid=0);
#else
fp = fopen(workerFile, w);
#endif
Is this abstractive code enough ;)
That was the initial price to have iSeries support in JK2.
But that's rigth, I'll create a jk_os.c to hide this
from main code (in both jk
More comments on APR and JK2.
While making tomcat-connectors rpm for jk2, and also
jk2 binaries for Linux, I wanted to have apache 1.3 jk2
built with JNI support.
JNI support in JK2 requires APR.
So I build an apr 0.9.1 rpm, which include apr-utils
since apr-utils couldn't be built without apr
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
You are currently working on mod_jk 1.2 and have done alot of
work on the docs. Would you like to do it?
We could add in the faq the common error messages and give an
explanation. Idea, even put an url to the online documentation on
jakarta ;-)
I can do it if you
Henri Gomez wrote:
Someone has an idea of what could be the problem with ap_ctx-get ?
It seems the user make use of ApacheToolbox.
-
This may add some info: I compiled Apache with ApacheToolbox. The
modules are static but it has DSO support in it. Then again, I would
expect an
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:36 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] JK2 2.1
#ifdef AS400
fp = fopen(workerFile, w, o_ccsid=0);
#else
fp = fopen(workerFile, w);
#endif
So I can understand, where is the difference in the code between Tomcat
4.1.10 and 4.1.12? And, do you mean that servlet mappings rather than
being generic to some servlet/* path be individualized?
At 12:26 PM 10/2/2002 +1000, you wrote:
micael wrote:
I cannot access a webapp with the
Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 23:41, Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Trying to interpret these error messages is a common question on tomcat-user.
My proposal:
1. Change these errors messages so that they accurately identify what happened.
2. For these common errors only report one
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:48 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] JK2 2.1
More comments on APR and JK2.
Ok, I stopped here since I feel there is many works to
conduct in JK2 to
make
Henri Gomez wrote:
More comments on APR and JK2.
While making tomcat-connectors rpm for jk2, and also
jk2 binaries for Linux, I wanted to have apache 1.3 jk2
built with JNI support.
JNI support in JK2 requires APR.
So I build an apr 0.9.1 rpm, which include apr-utils
since apr-utils
I cannot see any difference relative to the invoker filter, ExampleFilter,
in the web.xml for Tomcat 4.1.10 versus 4.1.12. Nothing seems to be
commented out. I must be missing some point here. What is it?
At 12:26 PM 10/2/2002 +1000, you wrote:
For security reasons (see the release notes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to setup Apache 2.0.42 + TomCat 4.1 with mod_webapp on Win NT.
I found mod_webapp binary for Apache 1.3. It works fine.
But Apache 2 requires another mod_webapp binary. I failed to find it on ASF
web sites.
I found only sources. I've downloaded
Okay, I got it. It is in the conf/web.xml file. My searches for
InvokerServlet were returning nothing. XP sucks. TextPad is not doing
that well on this either.
At 12:26 PM 10/2/2002 +1000, you wrote:
For security reasons (see the release notes for details), the invoker
servlet is disabled
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12069.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
micael wrote:
I cannot see any difference relative to the invoker filter, ExampleFilter,
in the web.xml for Tomcat 4.1.10 versus 4.1.12. Nothing seems to be
commented out. I must be missing some point here. What is it?
The invoker servlet, whilst still defined in 4.1.12, has no
I found this post while researching the mail list archives for a problem
I am having. The description Henri provides sounds exactly like what is
happening with my application. I have included the original threads below.
Prior to reading this posting I had not come to Henri's conclusion:
Under
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
More comments on APR and JK2.
While making tomcat-connectors rpm for jk2, and also
jk2 binaries for Linux, I wanted to have apache 1.3 jk2
built with JNI support.
JNI support in JK2 requires APR.
So I build an apr 0.9.1 rpm, which include
Vince Clark wrote:
I found this post while researching the mail list archives for a problem
I am having. The description Henri provides sounds exactly like what is
happening with my application. I have included the original threads below.
Prior to reading this posting I had not come to
I have been turning over every stone I can find. Still no progress. I
haven't ruled out a session problem but can't come up with a good way to
reproduce the error. It would have to involve some way of accepting
multiple cookies and making requests using each one.
Do you know of any good
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12783.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13194.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
Having some trouble clarifying uriMap processing.
Situation 1:
[uri:/examples/*]
The context is /
Situation 2:
[uri:/examples/*]
context=/ex
The context is /ex
Situation 3:
[uri:/examples/*]
context=/examples
The context is /examples
Now since all situations need the /examples/
mturk 2002/10/02 02:45:02
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_uriEnv.c
Log:
Remove the APR code from the uriEnv.
Revision ChangesPath
1.34 +7 -52 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_uriEnv.c
Index: jk_uriEnv.c
mturk 2002/10/02 02:49:17
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_uriMap.c
Log:
1. Correct webapps for standalone context statements inside any uri
2. Add the contextMap (not sure if that is the correct name)
The contextMap purpose is to map the uri with the prefix without the
mturk 2002/10/02 03:27:18
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_uriEnv.c
Log:
Add the context to the getAttribute, so we can display what is
the context of particular uri in the jkstatus
Revision ChangesPath
1.35 +7 -5
mturk 2002/10/02 03:28:36
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_uriMap.c
Log:
When creating 'free' webapps, put them to the correct vhost
changing to the real name composed of the host[:port]/context.
Revision ChangesPath
1.47 +12 -5
mturk 2002/10/02 03:58:06
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_uriMap.c
Log:
Fix the wrong uri association with the webaps.
If we specify the context in the uri, try the exactMap first cause webapp
can have a name that is subset of some larger context, so that larger one
would be
Hi,
Since 4.1.12 I have the following messages in the jk2.properties.save
\ua\up\ur\u.\uj\un\ui\uM\uo\ud\u
e\uS\uo\u=\ui\un\up\ur\uo\uc\u00
00e\us\us\u
While working on 4.1.2 rpms I noticed the following error at startup :
4732 [main] INFO modeler.Registry - Creating MBeanServer
5705 [main] INFO http11.Http11Protocol - Initializing Coyote HTTP/1.1
on port 8080
Starting service Tomcat-Standalone
Apache Tomcat/4.1
7324 [main] ERROR
Henri Gomez wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
More comments on APR and JK2.
While making tomcat-connectors rpm for jk2, and also
jk2 binaries for Linux, I wanted to have apache 1.3 jk2
built with JNI support.
JNI support in JK2 requires APR.
So I build an apr
mturk 2002/10/02 05:48:26
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_jni.c
Log:
We don't need the HAS_APR, cause we have HAVE_JNI.
Revision ChangesPath
1.28 +4 -8 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_worker_jni.c
Index: jk_worker_jni.c
mturk 2002/10/02 05:50:05
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_channel_apr_socket.c
Log:
Enable connecting to other IP addreses of the same host
if the first one is down, checking all of them.
This is only the case when the specified server name is not
in the dot-ip notation.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13069.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi
So I worked myself through the various CVS sources and have a couple of
official position questions to ask.
The CVS projects jakarta-tomcat-catalina and jakarta-tomcat-jasper, will be
forming the Tomcat 5 work?
The CVS project jakarta-tomcat-4.0 is the 4.x branch?
The CVS project
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13205.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13206.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I posted this several days ago on tomcat-user and haven't gotten any
responses so I am reposting it here.
I am running into a problem with JSP pages under 4.1.12. I looked through
the release notes, and the documentation and I can't find anything that
seems to apply. Given a Servlet with the
I BELIEVE that is due to some incorrect commenting in
your server.xml file. I had this problem once and I
thats what caused it.
Double check your server.xml file.
--- Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While working on 4.1.2 rpms I noticed the following
error at startup :
4732 [main]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10565.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
if you're using jdk 1.4, you have to have package names for your
classes. If you do not, it won't load the class correctly.
have you tried giving your classes a package name and trying it again?
peter
Sexton, George wrote:
I posted this several days ago on tomcat-user and haven't gotten
I'm confused by the change in behavior. I can use JDK 1.4 w/ Tomcat 4.0.4
and it works.
-Original Message-
From: peter lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 October, 2002 8:56 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: JSP Compilation Problem: Tomcat 4.1.12
if you're using jdk 1.4,
Henri Gomez wrote:
More comments on APR and JK2.
While making tomcat-connectors rpm for jk2, and also
jk2 binaries for Linux, I wanted to have apache 1.3 jk2
built with JNI support.
Do you have a multithreaded apache1.3 ? It's very important
to compile it as multithreaded and link pthread
Hello all Tomcat contributors,
I am conducting a survey about the way defects (or bugs-I use these two words
interchangeably) are handled in open source software projects. It is
very easy to fill out. It consists of three short sections which can be
completed at once or in different sessions.
Never mind. I found this described in Bug #10036.
-Original Message-
From: Sexton, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 October, 2002 9:03 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: RE: JSP Compilation Problem: Tomcat 4.1.12
I'm confused by the change in behavior. I can use JDK 1.4
I spent the last two days trying to use JspC to compile an entire webapp
and came across a problem. I'm not sure if this is a bug or not, but I
can reproduce it every time. I'm still trying to track down the cause,
but I thought I'd post a question and maybe some one with more knowledge
can
mturk 2002/10/02 08:36:22
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c
Log:
Introduced 3 new configuration parameters to the lb.
1. attempts -- replaces harcoded MAX_ATTEMPTS
2. recovery -- replaces hardcoded WAIT_BEFORE_RECOVER
3. timeout -- this one is new.
The timeout if
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, micael wrote:
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 00:12:20 -0700
From: micael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tomcat 4.1.12 and Servlet Access 404 Errors: BUG? One Last
Assurance
Here is a bit more information. I took a look at the jar files for jsp
1.1 tags and they include a taglib.tld file in meta-inf/. Once I remove
that, it compiles the pages fine. It looks like there's a conflict in
either jasper compiler or jspc that is unable to resolve which .tld file
to use.
This might be the right place for this post?
-Original Message-
From: Jindong Li
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:15 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:Software caused connection abort
Hi there,
I'm trying out tomcat4.1.12 and noticed that I'm getting exception
Hi,
I am getting
the following exception off the JSP engine in my tomcat 4.0 when I try to
execute a class file off my linux box. The details are as given
below.
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
sun/io/MalformedInputException at
sun.tools.java.Scanner.init(Scanner.java:144)
at
Hello,
Can you email me this file isapi_redirect.dll , as i couldn't find it.
Thank You.
Regards,
Ashley
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c
Log:
Introduced 3 new configuration parameters to the lb.
1. attempts -- replaces harcoded MAX_ATTEMPTS
2. recovery -- replaces hardcoded WAIT_BEFORE_RECOVER
3. timeout -- this
De: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: 2 de octubre de 2002 17:50
I there any way to disable completely that timeout?
Perhaps setting it to -1 or something like that?
This timeout disabled should be the default config..
Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega
--
To unsubscribe,
It is disabled by default and never checked (if you don't set the
timeout=x inside the [lb]).
I there any way to disable completely that timeout?
Perhaps setting it to -1 or something like that?
This timeout disabled should be the default config..
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
There has been some major fixes inside the uriMap, uriEnv, apr_socket
and lb that makes the 2_0_0 IMO unusable, and personally I'm ashamed as
a RM that this was a release after all :(.
Since we tagged and released JK2 as beta, seems to me that we could
easily do the same for the 2.0.1, and just
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13212.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11657.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
The attached patch for mod_jk2 (apache 1.3 and apache 2.0) sends a
REDIRECT_URL and a REDIRECT_QUERYSTRING header if the request inside apache
is redirected (e.g. through the use of the ErrorDocument directive). This
follows the environment variables detailed in
Definitely a problem with an extra '--' in your XML comments. The only
place that '--' is allowed is at the beginning and at the end:
!--blah blah--
Han Ming
On Wednesday, October 2, 2002, at 04:32 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
While working on 4.1.2 rpms I noticed the following error at startup
Not a vote, just wondered when we can expect to see the milestone builds
appearing?
Kevin Jones
Developmentor
www.develop.com
-Original Message-
From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 September 2002 20:14
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: RE: [VOTE] [5.0]
Are we documenting all those settings - and the details on why/how :-) ?
Mladen Turk wrote:
It is disabled by default and never checked (if you don't set the
timeout=x inside the [lb]).
I there any way to disable completely that timeout?
Perhaps setting it to -1 or something like
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 09:38, Christian Gross wrote:
Hi
So I worked myself through the various CVS sources and have a couple of
official position questions to ask.
The CVS projects jakarta-tomcat-catalina and jakarta-tomcat-jasper, will be
forming the Tomcat 5 work?
Yup.
The CVS
-Original Message-
On Behalf Of Costin Manolache
Are we documenting all those settings - and the details on
why/how :-) ?
Sure, like everyone else ;).
MT.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11657.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
De: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: 2 de octubre de 2002 18:11
Well, in theory, the release is only labeled as alpha,beta,stable,GA
or whatever, after the tagging and the relase itself ( stagging in a
test place not the official builds one ) , asking for a vote about the
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
On Behalf Of Costin Manolache
Are we documenting all those settings - and the details on
why/how :-) ?
Sure, like everyone else ;).
Yes, I know :-)
I'll try to get over the horrible and nonstandard DTD that we
use and start
-Original Message-
Sure, like everyone else ;).
Yes, I know :-)
I'll try to get over the horrible and nonstandard DTD that we
use and start documenting what I can still remember, and
anything new that I add. And I won't write any new jk code
until I finish at least
On Wednesday 02 October 2002 09:38 am, Christian Gross wrote:
Hi
So I worked myself through the various CVS sources and have a couple of
official position questions to ask.
The CVS projects jakarta-tomcat-catalina and jakarta-tomcat-jasper, will be
forming the Tomcat 5 work?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=471.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Can someone with windows experience check the attachment and
decide what to do ?
It seems like usefull and good, but I don't know what is the
benefit over just using 'net start' or the default service
manager.
--
Costin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5877.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4371.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Fredrik Westermarck wrote:
Hi!
I have added the possibility to use SSL with the JNDIRealm in the file
JNDIRealm.java.diff.
So how about this patch? Anyone that want to commit it, or else comment
on how it could be done in a better way?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12946.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9936.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8107.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12750.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13221.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I have in my workspace working a litle refactoring of the o.a.t.u.net
package translating the JSSE* classes to his own package ( named of
course jsse) and the same for PureTLs* ones ( with a package name of
ptls), i have the tc4.1.X tc5 versions working, and i can put the tc33
and others working
Tar the code and post it here...so we can look and enjoy :-)
-- Jeanfrancois
Ignacio J. Ortega wrote:
I have in my workspace working a litle refactoring of the o.a.t.u.net
package translating the JSSE* classes to his own package ( named of
course jsse) and the same for PureTLs* ones ( with a
- Original Message -
From: Ignacio J. Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'tomcat-dev' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 1:51 PM
Subject: Little refactoring in o.a.t.u.net
I have in my workspace working a litle refactoring of the o.a.t.u.net
package translating the JSSE*
here it is, only the net package zipped.. one point to look at, I've
converted the CipherData class in a inner one with public data.. all
other is merely renaming packages and moving files..
Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega
-Mensaje original-
De: Jean-Francois Arcand [mailto:[EMAIL
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13223.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13226.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Thanks for your answer. That helps quite a bit. Now I have another issue...
build-catalina:
[javac] Compiling 94 source files to
D:\Instructor\Projects\jakarta-tomcat-c
atalina\build\server\classes
[javac]
D:\Instructor\Projects\jakarta-tomcat-catalina\catalina\src\share\or
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13060.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Folks,
I'm trying to trace down a TCP_NODELAY problem and wanted to see if it
exists on the latest connector mod_jk2. So I configured Apache 2.0.42,
Tomcat 4.1.12 and downloaded jakarta-tomcat-connectors-4.1.12-src. I
managed to use GNU's libtoolize to configure (./configure
nacho 2002/10/02 18:33:15
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_channel_apr_socket.c jk_uriEnv.c
jk_uriMap.c jk_worker_jni.c jk_worker_lb.c
Log:
Problems with EOL
I was unable to catch any of the multiple times this issue was discussed on the
list, but
You need to be using the HEAD version of digester. It should have been built
in the directory specified by base.path. Double check that it was built
correctly. I just recreated it in my depends directory, and the system built
fine.
A number of the dependencies are unreleased at this point.
About this issue, I already pointed it out by commenting to JSR-154
servlet 2.4.
Actually invoker-like features in web containers have provided servlet
deployers with non-standard ways to invoke a servlet by sending a
request message including
/servlet/fully-qualified-class-name-of-a-servlet.
A
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13231.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13231.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
billbarker2002/10/02 22:24:06
Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java
Log:
Send the proper header for HTTP/1.0 Keep-Alives.
If we're going to support it, we should do it right.
Fix for bug #12783
Reported By:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12783.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13231.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Well it may be a premiere on Apache.
You could find an iSeries binary at:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/bin/iseries/
It's an OS400 SAVF, built on V5R1, but should works on V5R2,
which is zipped to save place.
On V5R1/V5R2 you should have the
Here is a bit more information. I took a look at the jar files for jsp
1.1 tags and they include a taglib.tld file in meta-inf/. Once I remove
that, it compiles the pages fine. It looks like there's a conflict in
either jasper compiler or jspc that is unable to resolve which .tld file
to use.
96 matches
Mail list logo
