Re: Working on patch (need feedback)

Gross, Jessica wrote: While using Tomcat and Active Directory, I found a small bug. Normally in LDAP, you escape certain special characters, one of which being the comma. This is done by DN=CN=Doe\, Jane, OU=unit, OU=People However, when I instructed Tomcat to search for roles by inserting the

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What about a 1.2.5 release soon ? billbarker2003/06/26 20:10:44 Modified:jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c Log: Port from apache-1.3 Revision ChangesPath 1.80 +6 -4 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c Index:

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c

BTW, we need a fix for this libtool problem. What about adding libtool in configure.in via a --with-libtool ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10385] - SSI-Servlet produces invalid character encoding information

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10385. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10385] - SSI-Servlet produces invalid character encoding information

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10385. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10385] - SSI-Servlet produces invalid character encoding information

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10385. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10558] - encodeURL form submit doesn't include hidden form variables

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10558. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21138] New: - javac cannot compile BaseDirContextTestCase.java

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21138. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21138] - javac cannot compile BaseDirContextTestCase.java

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21138. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[GUMP] Build Failure - jakarta-tomcat-5

This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://cvs.apache.org/builds/gump/2003-06-27/jakarta-tomcat-5.html Buildfile: build.xml prepare-release: [mkdir] Created dir:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21146] New: - Request variables from Apache are not available in Tomcat

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21146. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4091] - custom host with unpackWARs=true don't expand war automatically - work around fails log4j!

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4091. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/commonjk_uri_worker_map.c jk_uri_worker_map.h

On Thu, 27 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: billbarker2003/06/26 19:54:18 Modified:jk/native/common jk_uri_worker_map.c jk_uri_worker_map.h Log: Fix problem with URLs that contain //. This is essentially what Apache/httpd does in location_walk. Make sure you realize that,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21148] New: - catalina out not written when started via *.bat

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21148. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_uri_worker_map.cjk_uri_worker_map.h

Marc Slemko wrote: On Thu, 27 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: billbarker2003/06/26 19:54:18 Modified:jk/native/common jk_uri_worker_map.c jk_uri_worker_map.h Log: Fix problem with URLs that contain //. This is essentially what Apache/httpd does in location_walk. Make sure you

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/commonjk_uri_worker_map.c jk_uri_worker_map.h

On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Henri Gomez wrote: If you want to be very secure, you sue Apache in front of Tomcat, and tomcats located on other machines. In such case you use ajp13, and with this configuration, I DIDN'T HAVE ANY PROBLEM with '//' since it's handle by tomcat (tested with 3.3.1a),

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20029] - catalina.sh - command stop -force not working

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20029. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21157] New: - CookieExample is setting cookie after writing data

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21157. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_uri_worker_map.c

billbarker2003/06/27 19:55:55 Modified:jk/native/common jk_uri_worker_map.c Log: Reverting to the httpd symbol. Having thought about this, I think that supporting UNC paths in mod_jk doesn't have a valid use case, and is only likely to cause problems on Windows. Since this

Fw: Howto compile mod_jk2 under windows?

Hello gurus, This question I asked on Tomcat user list, But they let me ask it here. Who can help me please? -Ares - Original Message - From: Ares Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 2:21 PM Subject: Re: Howto compile mod_jk2 under

Re: Why Redhat 8.0 / 9.0 still use 2.0.40 (+ security fixes)

At 06:47 AM 6/27/2003, Mark J Cox wrote: For those who wonder why Redhat didn't update Apache 2.0 in distro 8.0 and 9.0, just read : http://www.redhat.com/advice/speaks_backport.html Apache httpd was an example that I happened to remember when writing that explanation - Apache is far from

Why Redhat 8.0 / 9.0 still use 2.0.40 (+ security fixes)

For those who wonder why Redhat didn't update Apache 2.0 in distro 8.0 and 9.0, just read : http://www.redhat.com/advice/speaks_backport.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: Why Redhat 8.0 / 9.0 still use 2.0.40 (+ security fixes)

For those who wonder why Redhat didn't update Apache 2.0 in distro 8.0 and 9.0, just read : http://www.redhat.com/advice/speaks_backport.html Apache httpd was an example that I happened to remember when writing that explanation - Apache is far from the worst offender to mix security updates

[TRICK] mod_jk build on Redhat 8.0 / 9.0

Under Redhat 8.0/9.0, the Apache 2.0 installed is 2.0.40 with security fixes. But the apxs is still the one from 2.0.40 so the apxs -q LIBTOOL, used in configure didn't works. A solution for RH users to build jk 1.2.4 is : ./buildconf.sh ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs make