DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21524] - Thread Leak

2003-07-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21524. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [5.0] [PROPOSAL] Make output buffer size limit configurable

2003-07-12 Thread Remy Maucherat
Bill Barker wrote: How about making the output buffer size limit configurable? (A value of -1 could mean indefinite growth, if people know what they are doing.) I also dislike the proposal, but since it's configurable, and off by default I can limit myself to -0. The biggest problem I see is that

Re: [5.0] [PROPOSAL] Make output buffer size limit configurable

2003-07-12 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 12:21 AM Subject: Re: [5.0] [PROPOSAL] Make output buffer size limit configurable Bill Barker wrote: How about making the output buffer size limit

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/generators StaticInterceptor.java

2003-07-12 Thread billbarker
billbarker2003/07/12 01:35:39 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/generators StaticInterceptor.java Log: Add support to the Default Servlet for the HTTP/1.1 methods OPTIONS and TRACE Fix for Bug #21454 (which was technically INVALID, until the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21454] - OPTIONS * and TRACE * don't work as expected

2003-07-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21454. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[GUMP] Build timed out - jk2

2003-07-12 Thread Craig McClanahan
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://cvs.apache.org/builds/gump/2003-07-12/jakarta-tomcat-jk-native2.html Buildfile: build.xml init.taskdef: guess.os: [echo]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21440] - jsp:include whose target performs a 'forward' does not behave as expected

2003-07-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21440. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

help me immediatly

2003-07-12 Thread bhanu singh
Dear please tell me when in tomcat the situation arrisses like it is creating the java fime but not the class file. i am facing this problem, i had given the context path properly and it is also creatin the folder in the work directory so i think the context path is correct. But when i atept to

RE: tomcat job opportunity

2003-07-12 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
I'm interested too, is this open to foreigners? Saludos, Ignacio J. Ortega -Original Message- From: Steven Pincus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 5:41 PM To: Steven Pincus Subject: tomcat job opportunity Greetings.I work for an executive search firm

RE: tomcat job opportunity

2003-07-12 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
Some times ( only some times ) i hate reply-to munging :)).. sorry for this very OT.. Saludos, Ignacio J. Ortega -Original Message- From: Ignacio J. Ortega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 4:28 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: RE: tomcat job opportunity

Re: [5.0] [PROPOSAL] Make output buffer size limit configurable

2003-07-12 Thread Costin Manolache
Remy Maucherat wrote: Bill Barker wrote: How about making the output buffer size limit configurable? (A value of -1 could mean indefinite growth, if people know what they are doing.) I also dislike the proposal, but since it's configurable, and off by default I can limit myself to -0. The

Re: [5.0] [PROPOSAL] Make output buffer size limit configurable

2003-07-12 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 8:41 AM Subject: Re: [5.0] [PROPOSAL] Make output buffer size limit configurable Remy Maucherat wrote: Bill Barker wrote: How about making the output buffer size limit