Remy Maucherat wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
If I remember correctly ( and if it didn't change ), tomcat needs
modeler in a parent classloader. Modeler has an optional dependency on
digester, which depends on beanutils and collections. They both depend
on logging, and modeler also depends on
Quoting NormW [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Good morning All.
There seems to be a bug on your mail server because every message I send
gets echoed (good), along with two others from xAT.sci.de with the same
topic field but reporting undelivered messages (bad). Since this effect only
occurs off the
Quoting Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting NormW [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Good morning All.
There seems to be a bug on your mail server because every message I send
gets echoed (good), along with two others from xAT.sci.de with the
same
topic field but reporting undelivered
Hi Craig,
Quoting Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Second test ... sorry for the noise, but I think I've weeded out the bogus
auto-responders and need to double check.
I found that almost all worms have 'localhost' or 'unknown' in the headers as sender;
perhaps its a good idea to filter
Hi,
I have following question. I'm running tomcat on my linux box in chroot
jail and via jsvc (to use other then root user). There is no way to
directly specify the -server swicth of the underlaying JDK (Sun
1.4.1_05) via jsvc. Is this option automatically set or not?
Thanks
--
Ji Mare
hgomez 2004/02/02 02:58:26
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_channel_apr_socket.c
Log:
Fix problem with port higher than 32K.
Should fix BR 17579.
Provided by NorW and Gunter Knauf
Revision ChangesPath
1.36 +4 -4
Commited, thanks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gknw.com/test/STATUS.txt.diff
--- ./jk/native2/STATUS.txt.origTue Oct 08 18:24:14 2002
+++ ./jk/native2/STATUS.txt Mon Feb 02 13:48:00 2004
@@ -1,9 +1,11 @@
JAKARTA TOMCAT CONNECTORS 2 (JK2) STATUS:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25055.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Commited, thanks
thanks, Henri!
Do you know what's about the ./native2/common/jk_channel_socket.c file? Does soemone
still use it since APR is now mandatory, or can we remove it? If it stays then we
should also patch the port there to 'unsigned short'...
Guenter.
Howdy,
FYI, it will be a while before BeanUtils (which is a dependency of
Digester itself, so it's the blocker on this collections 3.0 migration)
has a final release (it'll be BeanUtils 1.7) that depends on collections
3.0. The current BeanUtils dev version already builds fine against
Hi all!
I have been trying to find information on how to make a java-servlet for
download of content from the Tomcat-server without success.
The content differs from images, mp3's etc etc and I need the servlet in
order to do some database-stuff. The content also differs very much in size
and I
Howdy,
You might want to take a look at the balancer webapp that ships with
tomcat 5. And please continue this discussion on the tomcat-user
mailing list, not tomcat-dev. Thanks,
Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Tham Soon Hing [mailto:[EMAIL
Please follow up with tomcat-user since this is a user topic.
What you'll want to look at is utilizing the Byte-Range header. it is a
standard way for a client to get only part of a request. DefaultServlet has
support for this so if you need some example code, look there.
-Tim
Patrik
My first attempt to vote appears to have gotten lost in all the
virus e-mails. Here is my +1.
Larry
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 10:05 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] 4.1.30 release vote
Hi,
since the increment of shm-head-lbVer is protected it should also be avoided to
print a potential NULL value:
http://www.gknw.com/test/jk_worker_status.c.diff
=
--- ./jk/native2/common/jk_worker_status.c.orig Fri Oct 31
Günter Knauf a écrit :
Commited, thanks
thanks, Henri!
Do you know what's about the ./native2/common/jk_channel_socket.c file? Does soemone still use it since APR is now mandatory, or can we remove it?
If it stays then we should also patch the port there to 'unsigned short'...
Yes, it should be
martin grotzke a écrit :
dear developers (again),
please could you give me some hint why you do not respond?
is this topic to be asked at the users list?
it would be very kind to give some clarification,
regards,
martin
On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 17:49, martin grotzke wrote:
dear developers,
the
Hi Henri,
Do you know what's about the ./native2/common/jk_channel_socket.c file?
Does soemone still use it since APR is now mandatory, or can we remove
it?
If it stays then we should also patch the port there to 'unsigned
short'...
Yes, it should be removed but the conservative approach will
remm2004/02/02 09:35:47
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5
MapperListener.java
Log:
- Bug 26567: The mapper will complain if the default host is not known, which
could make mapping fail without a way to easily identify the cause.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26567.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
mmanders2004/02/02 09:38:04
Modified:jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c
Log:
Updated how we get the server port to work with APR 1.0 as well as previous
versions. Patch submitted by Guenter Knauf.
Revision ChangesPath
1.91 +2 -5
mmanders2004/02/02 09:59:56
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_channel_socket.c
Log:
Fix problem with port higher than 32K. Provided by Guenter Knauf. Fixed compile
problem for NetWare even though this isn't built for NetWare (or any other platform.)
Revision ChangesPath
Committed.
Mike Anderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/2/2004 10:29:26 AM
Hi Henri,
Do you know what's about the ./native2/common/jk_channel_socket.c
file?
Does soemone still use it since APR is now mandatory, or can we
remove
it?
If it stays then we should also patch the port there to 'unsigned
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26507.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2004/02/02 10:18:01
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java
Log:
- Revert useBean optimization done by Kin-Man, as it seems to violate the
spec wording (which basically says that an error should occur at runtime if the
class
is not a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26507.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
mmanders2004/02/02 10:21:08
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_status.c
Log:
Fix problem dereferencing a NULL value if shared memory/scoreboard information isn't
available. Patch provided by Guenter Knauf and NormW.
Revision ChangesPath
1.46 +11 -5
mmanders2004/02/02 10:23:55
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 jk_service_apache2.c
Log:
Updated how we get the server port to work with APR 1.0 as well as previous
versions.Patch submitted by Guenter Knauf.
Revision ChangesPath
1.38 +2 -4
mmanders2004/02/02 10:24:54
Modified:jk/native2 STATUS.txt
Log:
Updated to reflect current status. Patch submitted by Guenter Knauf.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +4 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/STATUS.txt
Index: STATUS.txt
jfarcand2004/02/02 10:28:26
Modified:.build.properties.default
webapps/webdav/WEB-INF web.xml
Log:
- Update to Xerces 2.6.1
- Fix validation error.
Revision ChangesPath
1.118 +4 -4 jakarta-tomcat-5/build.properties.default
Index:
thanks a bunch for all commits, Mike!!
but the month name you used I dont know yet: Bivenber ?? smile...
Guenter.
mmanders2004/02/02 10:24:54
Modified:jk/native2 STATUS.txt
Log:
Updated to reflect current status. Patch submitted by Guenter Knauf.
Revision Changes
-1.
Remy, please reread JSP 2.0 spec, p 1-101,1-102. Bullet .2 of the Semantics
section was added to allow for this kind of optimization. Bullet .5 and .6
will be executed ONLY IF the container choose not to issue translation errors.
-Kin-man
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 18:18:01 +
From:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26611.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Kin-Man Chung wrote:
-1.
Remy, please reread JSP 2.0 spec, p 1-101,1-102. Bullet .2 of the Semantics
section was added to allow for this kind of optimization. Bullet .5 and .6
will be executed ONLY IF the container choose not to issue translation errors.
I cannot really understand what the
Agreed that the spec can be clearer. :-)
This has been discussed by the Spec expert group, and bullet .2 was added
because some vendors wanted it. I'll check with the spec lead for a
clarification.
Also agreed that this breaks backward compatibility; but it not really too
bad. I think a lot
Quoting Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If I remember correctly ( and if it didn't change ), tomcat needs
modeler in a parent classloader. Modeler has an optional dependency on
digester, which depends on beanutils and collections. They both depend
on logging, and modeler also depends
Kin-Man Chung wrote:
Agreed that the spec can be clearer. :-)
This has been discussed by the Spec expert group, and bullet .2 was added
because some vendors wanted it. I'll check with the spec lead for a
clarification.
Ok.
Also agreed that this breaks backward compatibility; but it not really
remm2004/02/02 11:38:39
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
ApplicationHttpRequest.java
Log:
- Bug 26611: forward + include was hiding the special forward
request attributes.
Revision ChangesPath
1.17 +12 -5
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26611.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 20:17:29 +0100
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler
Generator.java
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kin-Man Chung wrote:
Agreed that the spec can be clearer.
Kin-Man Chung wrote:
I'd rather you check with me first before the patch, but since it is
already done, let's wait for the spec clarification before we do anything.
A revert on a revert would make us look really silly. :-)
This has been lying in BZ for a while, that's why I just patched.
Ok, I'll
Are there any big complaints if I convert Coyote to use Java2
collections ? (less sync)
Or is the pure JDK 1.1 compatibility still a big plus ?
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13797.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2004/02/02 12:03:05
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5
CoyoteRequest.java
Log:
- Bug 25363: Expose the SSL attributes in getAttributeNames(). I do not see
getAttributeNames() as being performance critical (since we don't do any
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25363.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7190.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26475.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
mmanders2004/02/02 12:12:07
Modified:jk/native2 STATUS.txt
Log:
Fixed fat fingers. Read then commit. Thanks Guenter.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/STATUS.txt
Index: STATUS.txt
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13797.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
no complaints here :)
just be careful of those ConcurrentModificationException(s) that are lurking
in the iterators :-)
Filip
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 11:54 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Converting Coyote
I suppose that Coyote can be optional for TC 3.3. I'm a bit less
comfortable on using them in o.a.t.u (since that would force a Java2
requirement on 3.3).
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 02,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17579.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Bill Barker wrote:
I suppose that Coyote can be optional for TC 3.3. I'm a bit less
comfortable on using them in o.a.t.u (since that would force a Java2
requirement on 3.3).
The thing which was annoying me the most was the attributes Hashtable in
the request.
I think util is using mostly custom
If you want to move o.a.t.u.log back to j-t, I've got no objection. I don't
think that anybody is using o.a.t.u.handler.
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 1:03 PM
Subject: Re:
I've been running into a problem where JspC cannot seem to handle pages that
use packaged taglibs, as added in the JSP 1.2 spec. Since the 1.2 spec has
been out for quite some time now (!), it seems odd that that is not
supported (and in the RI at that, although I realise the spec doesn't
exactly
On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 18:16, Henri Gomez wrote:
at jpackage, there's the question now if it would be better to provide
an rpm built with the connectors shipped with the latest tomcat-release,
or if it should be built with the connectors 2.0.2.
what would you suggest?
We'll try to provide
markt 2004/02/02 13:39:28
Modified:webapps/docs class-loader-howto.xml
Log:
- Fix 13805. Update docs to show that the shared directory is relative to
CATALINA_BASE not CATALINA_HOME.
- Reported by Michael Eriksson.
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +6 -6
markt 2004/02/02 13:40:31
Modified:webapps/tomcat-docs class-loader-howto.xml
Log:
- Fix 13805. Update docs to show that the shared directory is relative to
CATALINA_BASE not CATALINA_HOME.
- Reported by Michael Eriksson.
Revision ChangesPath
1.13 +5 -5
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13805.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
mmanders2004/02/02 13:58:55
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.dsp
Log:
Removed obsolete files. Patch from Guenter Knauf.
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +0 -12 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache2/mod_jk2.dsp
Index: mod_jk2.dsp
test
Warning: antivirus system report
There was a file infected with a virus in this message.
The file readme.zip was removed by the antivirus system.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
Hi Kin-Man,
I'm just about to look into this. I'll try to have an answer for you by
tonight.
- Mark
Kin-Man Chung wrote:
-1.
Remy, please reread JSP 2.0 spec, p 1-101,1-102. Bullet .2 of the Semantics
section was added to allow for this kind of optimization. Bullet .5 and .6
will be
luehe 2004/02/02 15:08:29
Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net PoolTcpEndpoint.java
Log:
Expose handshake failure as error, so it gets logged unconditionally
Revision ChangesPath
1.34 +4 -4
Okay, I took a look at the patch and the bug report and I think I know
what's going on now. Please let me know if I do not understand the
scenario correctly.
It seems there are some JSP 1.2 pages that misuse jsp:useBean by doing
one of the following:
1. The class attribute is used for a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26622.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Project: jakarta-tomcat-jk-native
State: Failed
URL:
http://lsd.student.utwente.nl/gump/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jakarta-tomcat-jk-native.html
- G U M P Y
Annotations:
- Error - Failed with reason build failed
Project: jakarta-tomcat-jk-native2
State: Failed
URL:
http://lsd.student.utwente.nl/gump/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jakarta-tomcat-jk-native2.html
- G U M P Y
Annotations:
- Error - Failed with reason build failed
Project: jakarta-tomcat-5
State: Failed
URL: http://lsd.student.utwente.nl/gump/jakarta-tomcat-5/jakarta-tomcat-5.html
- G U M P Y
Annotations:
- Error - Failed with reason build failed
- G U M P Y
69 matches
Mail list logo
