DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26229.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Costin Manolache wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Well, if we didn't get the POST somewhere on the WebServer, and if the
tomcat failed to respond, we couldn't resent the whole POST to the
second one.
If we get the first bytes ( but not the entire POST ), we can still save
them, and if the first
Bill Barker wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 11:03 AM
Subject: Re: Mod_Jk2 - Default Worker
Henri Gomez wrote:
Well, if we didn't get the POST somewhere on the WebServer, and if the
tomcat
Bill Barker wrote:
The (modified) text of the proposal is below. The [VOTE] runs until
Thursday, Feb 19 6:00 PM PDT.
ballot
[ ] +1 I agree with this release and will support it.
[ ] +0 I agree with this release, but can't support it.
[ ] -0 I disagree with this release, but won't block it.
[ ]
hgomez 2004/02/13 00:40:42
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_requtil.c jk_worker_lb.c jk_msg_ajp.c
jk_worker_ajp13.c
jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c
jk/native2/include jk_msg.h jk_service.h
jk/native2/server/aolserver
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26906.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
hgomez 2004/02/13 00:46:37
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_vm_default.c
Log:
Make line longer but GCC more happy with it :)
Revision ChangesPath
1.31 +2 -4 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_vm_default.c
Index: jk_vm_default.c
I commited the fixes for the POST recovery in JK and JK2
when in LB mode which should solve this major problem.
Thanks to take a look at it
Could Alexander who is the original reporter validate the fix ?
-
To unsubscribe,
Bill Barker wrote:
The (modified) text of the proposal is below. The [VOTE] runs until
Thursday, Feb 19 6:00 PM PDT.
ballot
[ ] +1 I agree with this release and will support it.
[X] +0 I agree with this release, but can't support it.
[ ] -0 I disagree with this release, but won't block it.
[ ]
Amy Roh wrote:
Would it be possible to wait until tomorrow to start doing that (ie,
after I tag 5.0.19) ?
Sure, it can wait. I wasn't planning on doing it right away. I need to see
whether we can accomplish this first - it'll be very nice to do so.
BTW, another problem: on StandardContext and
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26906.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Bill Barker wrote:
The (modified) text of the proposal is below. The [VOTE] runs until
Thursday, Feb 19 6:00 PM PDT.
ballot
[ ] +1 I agree with this release and will support it.
[X] +0 I agree with this release, but can't support it.
[ ] -0 I disagree with this release,
Henri,
If you want to use shorter lines, you can wrap long lines and still
compile. For example (in case my patch gets stripped):
printf(This is a )
very long line.\n);
-Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 2/13/2004 12:46 AM:
hgomez 2004/02/13 00:46:37
Modified:
David Rees wrote, On 2/13/2004 1:14 AM:
If you want to use shorter lines, you can wrap long lines and still
compile. For example (in case my patch gets stripped):
printf(This is a )
very long line.\n);
Oops, my patch was reversed. Here's a good one.
-Dave
--- jk_vm_default.c.orig
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26907.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Henri Gomez wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Bill Barker wrote:
The (modified) text of the proposal is below. The [VOTE] runs until
Thursday, Feb 19 6:00 PM PDT.
ballot
[ ] +1 I agree with this release and will support it.
[X] +0 I agree with this release, but can't support it.
[ ] -0 I disagree
David Rees wrote:
David Rees wrote, On 2/13/2004 1:14 AM:
If you want to use shorter lines, you can wrap long lines and still
compile. For example (in case my patch gets stripped):
printf(This is a )
very long line.\n);
Oops, my patch was reversed. Here's a good one.
Are you sure it
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26909.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I'd need new procrun binaries for the new build (in j-t-c/procrun).
The old build isn't broken, so this is not critical, but it would be
nice (assuming there are updates).
Thanks :)
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Henri Gomez wrote:
David Rees wrote:
David Rees wrote, On 2/13/2004 1:14 AM:
If you want to use shorter lines, you can wrap long lines and still
compile. For example (in case my patch gets stripped):
printf(This is a )
very long line.\n);
Oops, my patch was reversed. Here's a good
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
I'd need new procrun binaries for the new build (in j-t-c/procrun).
The old build isn't broken, so this is not critical, but it would be
nice (assuming there are updates).
There _are_ updates. So someone will have to produce the binaries.
Thanks :)
Rémy
-Original Message-
From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 11:42 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Release the HEAD of j-t as Tomcat 3.3.2
The (modified) text of the proposal is below. The [VOTE] runs until
Thursday, Feb 19
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26909.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26689.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Martin Gainty wrote:
Any comment(s)/suggestion(s) from Microsoft Tech Support?
Keep me apprised,
So far my post is unanswered.
Is there anyone else who has VS 2003 .net that can try this?
Aryeh
Marty Gainty
617-852-7822
- Original Message -
From: Aryeh Katz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Aryeh Katz wrote:
Martin Gainty wrote:
Any comment(s)/suggestion(s) from Microsoft Tech Support?
Keep me apprised,
So far my post is unanswered.
Is there anyone else who has VS 2003 .net that can try this?
Aryeh
If you've got a valid makefile for .net 2003, send it to the list
so we could
Henri Gomez wrote:
Aryeh Katz wrote:
Martin Gainty wrote:
Any comment(s)/suggestion(s) from Microsoft Tech Support?
Keep me apprised,
If you've got a valid makefile for .net 2003, send it to the list
so we could include it in the release 2.0.4
As I said in my original post, it seems that there
Howdy,
ballot
[ X ] +1 I agree with this release and will support it.
[ ] +0 I agree with this release, but can't support it.
[ ] -0 I disagree with this release, but won't block it.
[ ] -1 I don't think this release should happen because:
/ballot
And a good weekend to all ;)
Yoav Shapira
mturk 2004/02/13 06:14:14
Modified:procrun/bin tomcat.exe tomcatw.exe
Log:
Latest binaries.
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +28 -23jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun/bin/tomcat.exe
Binary file
1.7 +98 -113
I'd need new procrun binaries for the new build (in j-t-c/procrun).
The old build isn't broken, so this is not critical, but it
would be
nice (assuming there are updates).
There _are_ updates. So someone will have to produce the binaries.
Should be in the CVS.
MT.
Henri Gomez wrote, On 2/13/2004 3:08 AM:
Are you sure it will works on non gcc compiler ?
I'd like to see Jean-Frederic opinion :) (exotic os/hardware)
Does not look like it does, but at least now you'll know that if you're
writing gcc specific code you can do it. ;-)
The only non-gcc compiler
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26917.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26917.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
David Rees wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote, On 2/13/2004 3:08 AM:
Are you sure it will works on non gcc compiler ?
I'd like to see Jean-Frederic opinion :) (exotic os/hardware)
Does not look like it does, but at least now you'll know that if you're
writing gcc specific code you can do it. ;-)
The
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mturk 2004/02/13 06:14:14
Modified:procrun/bin tomcat.exe tomcatw.exe
Log:
Latest binaries.
Thanks a lot :)
So I'll wait a bit, see if Mark comments on bug 26906 (I think it's
invalid: the fix seems to imply the URL sent by the client is always
invalid),
Hi to all,
JK 2.0.4 should be released next week.
- The build has been fixed by JF Clere and Kurt Miller.
- The ping/pong features and POST recovery has been commited.
Pending :
- Take a look at bugzilla to see if there is showstoppers.
- Update the documentation.
I'll take care of
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mturk 2004/02/13 06:14:14
Modified:procrun/bin tomcat.exe tomcatw.exe
Log:
Latest binaries.
Thanks a lot :)
So I'll wait a bit, see if Mark comments on bug 26906 (I think it's
invalid: the fix seems to imply the URL sent by the
Hi,
the patch below adds an install target for apxs build to the Makefile.
http://www.gknw.com/test/Makefile.in.diff
==
--- ./jk/native2/Makefile.in.orig Mon Nov 10 12:15:04 2003
+++ ./jk/native2/Makefile.inWed Feb 11
There isn't an install target in server/apache13/Makefile.apxs yet. I
will be committing one soon (along with some other changes).
From: Guenter Knauf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
the patch below adds an install target for apxs build to the
Makefile.
http://www.gknw.com/test/Makefile.in.diff
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26927.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I'll look at this now...
Mark
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So I'll wait a bit, see if Mark comments on bug 26906 (I think it's
invalid: the fix seems to imply the URL sent by the client
is always
invalid), and then I'll put the 5.0.19 tag (and then someone
will
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26927.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Kurt,
There isn't an install target in server/apache13/Makefile.apxs yet. I
will be committing one soon (along with some other changes).
but there's one already in server/apache2/Makefile.apxs...
with this change I can directly build and install out of native2 dir with:
configure
markt 2004/02/13 12:06:50
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets
WebdavServlet.java
Log:
Fix bug 26906.
- The destination path needs to be normalised after the protocol and host has been
removed (if present).
- Reported by rsudharsan
markt 2004/02/13 12:11:12
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets
WebdavServlet.java
Log:
Fix bug 26906.
- The destination path needs to be normalised after the protocol and host has been
removed (if present).
- Reported by rsudharsan
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26906.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Fixed. (with an alternative patch)
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll look at this now...
Mark
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So I'll wait a bit, see if Mark comments on bug 26906 (I think it's
invalid: the fix seems to imply the URL sent by the
Mark Thomas wrote:
Fixed. (with an alternative patch)
Yes, the original patch really made it sound like the bug was invalid.
Thanks.
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26890.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11542.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8940.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22353.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
As discussed previously.
I'll make that early tomorrow: I don't have the time needed to update
the changelog tonight.
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23169.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13908.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I have noticed a number of bug fixes and patches to mod_jk 1.2.
Whenever you think it is ready I can act as the release manager for
a mod_jk 1.2.6 if you want me to.
Regards,
Glenn
--
Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL
truk2004/02/13 13:24:41
Modified:jk/support jk_exec.m4
Log:
jk_exec_retvalue must be on its own line and \n was always cutting it
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +2 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/support/jk_exec.m4
Index: jk_exec.m4
truk2004/02/13 13:38:26
Modified:jk/native2 Makefile.in
jk/native2/server/apache13 Makefile.apxs.in
jk/support jk_apr.m4
Log:
add apxs meta targets and jk2-install-apxs from Guenter Knauf
For apache13:
Change apr and apr-util to install into
Bill Barker wrote:
The (modified) text of the proposal is below. The [VOTE] runs until
Thursday, Feb 19 6:00 PM PDT.
ballot
[ ] +1 I agree with this release and will support it.
[X] +0 I agree with this release, but can't support it.
[ ] -0 I disagree with this release, but won't block it.
[ ]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26907.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I commited the fixes for the POST recovery in JK and JK2
when in LB mode which should solve this major problem.
Could Alexander who is the original reporter validate the fix ?
YES and NO:
Post recovery works now in the scenario, the loadbalancer doesn't forget
the post body when a tomcat
markt 2004/02/13 14:19:52
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets
WebdavServlet.java
Log:
Fix bug 26906.
- Lock token must be returned after lock creation.
- Patch provided by Pieter van Prooijen
Revision ChangesPath
1.10
markt 2004/02/13 14:21:04
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets
WebdavServlet.java
Log:
Fix bug 26906.
- Lock token must be returned after lock creation.
- Patch provided by Pieter van Prooijen
- Port from TC5
Revision Changes
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16323.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21288.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I'd like to see this since Henri's timeout fixes really help some issues
that we've seen with apps that hang Tomcat threads. It might be good to
wait until the POST data issues are resolved (see threads titled POST
recovery in JK and JK2 HEAD and Mod_JK2 - Default Worker)
Mike Anderson
[EMAIL
Are you using modeler 1.1? You need to have the latest modeler change for
the fix - org.apache.commons.modeler.BaseModelMBean 1.25. The fix went in
after 1.1 release. How about that for sneaky ;-) All should be good if
you have the latest BaseModelMBean. :-)
Amy
Yes, it says it returns a
Amy Roh wrote:
Are you using modeler 1.1? You need to have the latest modeler change for
the fix - org.apache.commons.modeler.BaseModelMBean 1.25. The fix went in
after 1.1 release. How about that for sneaky ;-) All should be good if
you have the latest BaseModelMBean. :-)
The diff seems to
luehe 2004/02/13 16:46:01
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler
JspDocumentParser.java
Log:
Fixed Bugtraq 4994881 (Parser for JSP pages in XML syntax ignores
custom action's body type)
Sorry this commit is so close to the tagging, but
69 matches
Mail list logo
