DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27894.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16830.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16830.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27884.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27893.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Our thin-client J2EE app run on JBoss 3.x + Tomcat 4.1.x. We want to integrate our
thin-clinet J2EE application with MS Active Directory, so that a user with IE 6.0 will
not need to sign in to acces our application after he/she has signed in to his/her
Windows workstation. IE 6.0 support
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27894.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Sriram N wrote:
--- n. alex rupp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's true. Tomcat's 95% ready. It took me about a week to learn enough
about
GBeans and Catalina to get a bolt-on version of Tomcat running inside
Geronimo,
so we don't need a jumpstart. It isn't in the code base right now because
there
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27897.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27897.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27647.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16830.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14359.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Mladen could you verify this ?
It could be a show stopper for 2.0.4 release
Thanks
---BeginMessage---
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27647.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27900.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27647.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2004/03/24 03:51:04
Modified:docs bugreport.html
docs/faq tomcatuser.html
docs/faq/printer tomcatuser.html
xdocsbugreport.xml
Log:
- Add missing bug link.
Revision ChangesPath
1.21 +3 -16
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27458.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27902.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16830.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27893.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27893.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I've got no report or showstopper which prevent me to
tag jk2 2.0.4.
I'll tag it later this afternoon (CET) and prepare the
source tarball.
Thanks to stop commit on jk2 native
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
hgomez 2004/03/24 05:32:20
Modified:jk/native2/include jk_global.h
Log:
Mark as release
Revision ChangesPath
1.24 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/include/jk_global.h
Index: jk_global.h
hgomez 2004/03/24 05:40:48
Modified:jk/native2/include jk_global.h
Log:
jk2 2.0.4 has been tagged as jk2_2_0_4.
Switch to jk2 2.0.5-dev
Revision ChangesPath
1.25 +4 -4 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/include/jk_global.h
Index: jk_global.h
jk2 2.0.4 has been tagged.
jk2_2_0_4
We're now in HEAD at 2.0.5-dev
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 2:41 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: jk2 2.0.4 tagged
jk2 2.0.4 has been tagged.
jk2_2_0_4
We're now in HEAD at 2.0.5-dev
Cool :)
Will you build the sources?
MT.
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 2:41 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: jk2 2.0.4 tagged
jk2 2.0.4 has been tagged.
jk2_2_0_4
We're now in HEAD at 2.0.5-dev
Cool :)
Will you build the sources?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27884.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
Will you build the sources?
I'm preparing a source tarball, and will build Linux binaries
for Fedora Core 1, Suse 9.0 and Suse SLES 8.0 (PPC).
Others archs, are welcomed
Did we agreed on binary dist?
What's gonna be the dir
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27884.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
Will you build the sources?
I'm preparing a source tarball, and will build Linux binaries
for Fedora Core 1, Suse 9.0 and Suse SLES 8.0 (PPC).
Others archs, are welcomed
Did we agreed on binary dist?
I was thinking
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
Will you build the sources?
I'm preparing a source tarball, and will build Linux binaries
for Fedora Core 1, Suse 9.0 and Suse SLES 8.0 (PPC).
Others archs, are welcomed
Henri Gomez wrote:
jk2 2.0.4 has been tagged.
jk2_2_0_4
We're now in HEAD at 2.0.5-dev
Congratulations :)
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I would like to propose two modifications:
[1] XML Validation
I would like to make two changes to the way xml validation is implemented:
(1) make the attribute available at the context level (turned off by
default)
(2) add supports for turning on/off web.xml
hgomez 2004/03/24 07:33:36
Modified:jk HOWTO-RELEASE
Log:
Add comments on zip
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +4 -0 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/HOWTO-RELEASE
Index: HOWTO-RELEASE
===
RCS
Jess Holle wrote:
Works just great in quick testing at least.
I'm still waiting for my precompilation script to return to determine
whether Jasper still compiles everything it used to (and should have).
Unfortunately, Tomcat 5.0.20 cannot compile 6 out our 985 JSP pages
(which Tomcat 5.0.19
Jess Holle wrote:
Jess Holle wrote:
Works just great in quick testing at least.
I'm still waiting for my precompilation script to return to determine
whether Jasper still compiles everything it used to (and should have).
Unfortunately, Tomcat 5.0.20 cannot compile 6 out our 985 JSP pages
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26444
-Tim
Jess Holle wrote:
Jess Holle wrote:
Unfortunately, Tomcat 5.0.20 cannot compile 6 out our 985 JSP pages
(which Tomcat 5.0.19 compiled just fine).
The issue can be traced directly to a single entry in the change log:
Add some
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose two modifications:
[1] XML Validation
I would like to make two changes to the way xml validation is implemented:
(1) make the attribute available at the context level (turned off by
default)
(2) add supports for
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Well, your pages are invalid. Really, I don't see what's so
mysterious: anything used in useBean must be a JavaBean.
This will not be fixed.
Did I miss something?
Are JavaBean default constructors required to succeed in any/all
environments?
Specifically are they
Based on the given bug id, I would propose a different implementation
than that found in 5.0.20.
Specifically I would suggest that Generator:
1. Try to load the given class.
2. Look up its default (no-args) constructor via reflection. [This
is the key part, look up the constructor but
P.S. Nothing in the quoted spec segments implies that the JSP compiler
should attempt to actually *instantiate* beans at compile time or expect
that that should work.
--
Jess Holle
Jess Holle wrote:
Based on the given bug id, I would propose a different implementation
than that found in
I will be out of the office starting 18/03/2004 and will not return until
29/03/2004.
For hotel reservations in Paris pls contact Sandrine Robert/ Paris
reception.
Exceptionnaly, in case of difficulties with your Dial car, pls contact
Nicolas Galle
Hi,
However, I must warn you. Tomcat is not capable of being truly
integrated
into the Geronimo environment, because it does not use a componentized
architectural style. Tomcat is very much an application, which can be
bolted onto the side of
Geronimo, but cannot be broken down and
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27911.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27911.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27757.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I'm using log4j to log application code for several websites,
each of which has at least one WebApp, and some of which have
more than one. I'm configuring log4j with an initialization
servlet (that also does a few other things) from a properties
file using .configureAndWatch(java.io.File).
**
**
WARNING: WinProxy has detected a virus in file
attached to this e-mail message!
The attachment has been automatically removed to
protect your network.
WinProxy Administrator:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16830.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
**
**
WARNING: WinProxy has detected a virus in file
attached to this e-mail message!
The attachment has been automatically removed to
protect your network.
WinProxy Administrator:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27916.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
The service.bat and tomcat.exe in Tomcat 5 have a number of issues as I
see it:
1. The new tomcat.exe (aka procrun) does not seem to reliably route
stdout and stderr to the specified files.
* Compare JavaService (aka Tomcat 4.1.x's tomcat.exe) stdout
and stderr
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27917.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Is there a source tarball for 2.0.4 available for download somewhere yet?
--
Jess Holle
Henri Gomez wrote:
jk2 2.0.4 has been tagged.
jk2_2_0_4
We're now in HEAD at 2.0.5-dev
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
YOUR E-MAIL HAS BEEN RECEIVED BY ONEBEACON CUSTOMER SERVICE. YOU MAY
EXPECT TO HAVE A RESPONSE WITHIN 24 HOURS. THANK YOU FOR WRITING US.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27916.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27917.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I followed the instructions in the build.txt. I got the source for httpd and copied
the srclib over to
native2\srclib.
The instructions say to open the isapi.dsw. There is no dsw in the native2 directory
there but there is in the native directory.
under native2\server\isapi there is an
jfarcand2004/03/24 12:00:22
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina Context.java
catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
StandardContext.java
catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeans
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27917.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
kinman 2004/03/24 13:05:27
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java
Log:
- FIx bugzilla 16830: bodyContent content not reset when a tag is reused.
Revision ChangesPath
1.227 +7 -2
kinman 2004/03/24 13:31:07
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Tag:
tomcat_4_branch Generator.java
Log:
-Fix 16830: bodyContent content not reset when a tag is reused.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No
- Original Message -
From: Jess Holle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 11:18 AM
Subject: Tomcat 5's service.bat, etc.
The service.bat and tomcat.exe in Tomcat 5 have a number of issues as I
see it:
1. The new
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16830.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello Tomcat Developers!
I'm working with Tomcat 4.1.29 and I'd like to use my own
ServerSocketFactory, as I'm working on a custom implementation of httpg
(HTTP over GSSAPI authenticated sockets). This seems impossible by
design, which I think may be a bug.
Instead of using the deprecated
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18489.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Bill Barker wrote:
The service.bat and tomcat.exe in Tomcat 5 have a number of issues as I
see it:
1. The new tomcat.exe (aka procrun) does not seem to reliably route
stdout and stderr to the specified files.
* Compare JavaService (aka Tomcat 4.1.x's tomcat.exe) stdout
I think your only valid point is the one about the need to make
errorOnUseBeanInvalidClassAttribute be switchable from Jspc main,
but we are not bundling jspc scripts anymore, so I didn't feel there
is a need for it. Anyway, its value can be set with an ant task.
Otherwise, Jasper behaves the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27925.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27925.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
We have a similar need (though for a different reason) and extend
CoyoteServerSocketFactory. We're running TC 4.1.29.
Here's our Connector element:
Connector className=org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector
port=7002
scheme=https
secure=true
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20380.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
In CoyoteConnector.initialize() there's an assumption that if the
factory is an instance of CoyoteServerSocketFactory, it's gonna be SSL,
and it sets secure=true. Then in
Http11ConnectionHandler.checkSocketFactory() in the Http11Protocol.java,
it interprets that secure flag as SSL and uses
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27917.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
billbarker2004/03/24 19:01:21
Modified:jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkCoyoteHandler.java
Log:
Make certain that the endpoint is closed, even if Apache has already dropped the
connection.
IOExceptions here are pretty harmless, since they mean that Apache has already
finished
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27917.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Merci d'avoir fait parvenir un courriel à [EMAIL PROTECTED] Toutefois, cette adresse
courriel n'est plus surveillée.
Veuillez cliquer sur le lien suivant
http://www.intuitgreenpoint.com/SupportQuestions/support.dll/
http://www.intuitgreenpoint.com/SupportQuestions/support.dll/
79 matches
Mail list logo
