I will be out of the office starting 04/09/2004 and will not return until
04/13/2004.
I would be pleased to respond to your email upon my return.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
Hello,
Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed.
Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp
We apology for the inconvenience.
Best Regards,
--
The DirectXtras Team
-
DirectXtras -
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Your Username and Password
** This is an automatic reply. Please do not respond directly to this
e-mail **
Your support request has been received by Opera Software.
You are receiving this automatic reply because
Dear Tomcat Developers List,
The Support Request you submitted to the Opera Software
Support Desk with the Title of Lynda Cullen/KIT/MLAC is out of the office. has been
given the following ID-number:
274783
Please do not change the Subject line if you want to reply
to this e-mail.
Hello,
Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed.
Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp
We apology for the inconvenience.
Best Regards,
--
The DirectXtras Team
-
DirectXtras -
Hello,
Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed.
Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp
We apology for the inconvenience.
Best Regards,
--
The DirectXtras Team
-
DirectXtras -
Dear Tomcat Developers List,
The Support Request you submitted to the Opera Software
Support Desk with the Title of Autoreply: Lynda Cullen/KIT/MLAC is out of the
office. has been
given the following ID-number:
274784
Please do not change the Subject line if you want to reply
to this
Hello,
Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed.
Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp
We apology for the inconvenience.
Best Regards,
--
The DirectXtras Team
-
DirectXtras -
I will be out of the office starting 04/09/2004 and will not return until
04/13/2004.
I would be pleased to respond to your email upon my return.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
Hello,
Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed.
Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp
We apology for the inconvenience.
Best Regards,
--
The DirectXtras Team
-
DirectXtras -
Dear Tomcat Developers List,
The Support Request you submitted to the Opera Software
Support Desk with the Title of Lynda Cullen/KIT/MLAC is out of the office. has been
given the following ID-number:
274838
Please do not change the Subject line if you want to reply
to this e-mail.
Hello,
Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed.
Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp
We apology for the inconvenience.
Best Regards,
--
The DirectXtras Team
-
DirectXtras -
Dear Tomcat Developers List,
The Support Request you submitted to the Opera Software
Support Desk with the Title of Autoreply: Lynda Cullen/KIT/MLAC is out of the
office. has been
given the following ID-number:
274839
Please do not change the Subject line if you want to reply
to this
Hello,
Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed.
Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp
We apology for the inconvenience.
Best Regards,
--
The DirectXtras Team
-
DirectXtras -
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28305.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello,
Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed.
Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp
We apology for the inconvenience.
Best Regards,
--
The DirectXtras Team
-
DirectXtras -
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28305.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello,
Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed.
Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp
We apology for the inconvenience.
Best Regards,
--
The DirectXtras Team
-
DirectXtras -
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28305.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello,
Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed.
Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp
We apology for the inconvenience.
Best Regards,
--
The DirectXtras Team
-
DirectXtras -
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28305.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello,
Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed.
Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp
We apology for the inconvenience.
Best Regards,
--
The DirectXtras Team
-
DirectXtras -
hgomez 2004/04/09 01:22:30
Modified:jk/java/org/apache/jk/common JkMX.java
Log:
Set the RMI port to the one provided in parameter.
If not, MX4J will use the default one, 1099, and JRMP adaptor
won't be able to access service
Revision ChangesPath
1.22 +2 -0
Hello,
Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed.
Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp
We apology for the inconvenience.
Best Regards,
--
The DirectXtras Team
-
DirectXtras -
Dear Tomcat Developers List,
The Support Request you submitted to the Opera Software
Support Desk with the Title of cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/common JkMX.java has been
given the following ID-number:
274864
Please do not change the Subject line if you
Hello,
Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed.
Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp
We apology for the inconvenience.
Best Regards,
--
The DirectXtras Team
-
DirectXtras -
Norton AntiVirus Deleted1.txt
Description: plain/text
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Tomcat Developers List,
The Support Request you submitted to the Opera Software
Support Desk with the Title of Hi, it's me has been
given the following ID-number:
274879
Please do not change the Subject line if you want to reply
to this e-mail. Please use the below URL if you wish
I will be out of the office starting 04/09/2004 and will not return until
04/13/2004.
I would be pleased to respond to your email upon my return.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
ballot
Release 5.0.22 as Stable:
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
/ballot
I've tested the new Windows wrapper, and it did work for me (and it
looks as if we did hire some M$ guy to do its UI). However, some more
testing is needed (note: it's not suppoed to work on Win9x for now).
Another risky change is the
Dear Tomcat Developers List,
The Support Request you submitted to the Opera Software
Support Desk with the Title of [5.0.22] Release vote has been
given the following ID-number:
274972
Please do not change the Subject line if you want to reply
to this e-mail. Please use the below URL if
mturk 2004/04/09 05:21:00
Modified:procrun/bin tomcat5w.exe tomcat5.exe
Log:
Latest binary builds
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +127 -133 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun/bin/tomcat5w.exe
Binary file
1.2 +94 -96
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 2:00 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: [5.0.22] Release vote
ballot
Release 5.0.22 as Stable:
[x] Yes
[ ] No
/ballot
I've tested the new Windows wrapper, and it did work for me
Mladen Turk wrote
There was a bug in the service.bat (now fixed in the CVS) caused by missing
quotations.
I've also updated the prunsvc so that manager gets shut down on uninstall,
and -Xss now uses KB instead Bytes, so you don't need to round that yourself
on the 1024 byte boundary.
Can you
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat
There was a bug in the service.bat (now fixed in the CVS) caused by
missing quotations.
Can you repack only those tree?
No.
Ok then, It will manifest only when Tomcat installed in path having spaces,
but only for manual install, so
Remy Maucherat wrote:
ballot
Release 5.0.22 as Stable:
[X ] Yes
[ ] No
/ballot
I've tested the new Windows wrapper, and it did work for me (and it
looks as if we did hire some M$ guy to do its UI). However, some more
testing is needed (note: it's not suppoed to work on Win9x for now).
Another
Hi,
ballot
Release 5.0.22 as Stable:
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
/ballot
I'm voting 0 on this, because of one bug I found:
- Logging into Admin webapp, clicking on Connector (8080) brings up an
error page: javax.servlet.jsp.JspException: Missing message for key
connector.useBodyEncodingForURI
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28313.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
ballot
Release 5.0.22 as Stable:
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
/ballot
I've tested the new Windows wrapper, and it did work for me (and it
looks as if we did hire some M$ guy to do its UI). However, some more
testing is needed (note: it's not suppoed to work on Win9x for now).
Another
Angus Mezick wrote:
I forgot to mention that I am using the following software:
Apache: apache_2.0.47-win32-x86-no_ssl.msi
JK2: mod_jk2-2.0.43.dll AND the 2.0.4 mod_jk.so from the jakarta site.
Tomcat: 4.1.27
-Original Message-
From: Angus Mezick
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 9:44 AM
I'm not a committer, but...
Given the number of did you get _ important fix xyz _? mails, it
seems to make sense to re-tag.
It has been a while since a public release and it would be nice to have
a public release with this latest flurry of fixes (i.e. so maybe the
public release is
ballot
Release 5.0.22 as Stable:
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
/ballot
I vote -1
Autodeploy with HostConfig not working correct with Windows.
see my bug report with a fix.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28262
Regards
Peter
Remy Maucherat schrieb:
ballot
Release 5.0.22 as Stable:
[ ] Yes
[ ]
ballot
Release 5.0.22 as Stable:
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[x] Prefer not to :)
/ballot
-0
I don't think we should relase a stable with a few bugs we can fix easily,
a lot of people don't read the release notes,
and might start filing bugs against them, so we will lose the time later
anyway. There
Hi,
I don't think we should relase a stable with a few bugs we can fix
easily,
a lot of people don't read the release notes,
and might start filing bugs against them, so we will lose the time
later
anyway. There were several check ins after the tag, from different
committers, so I think it would
So, the only relationship between JK lbfactor and JK2 lb_factor is in
their names and the fact they have SOMETHING to do with load balancing.
They definetly don't seem to do the same thing.
--Angus
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 09,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28072.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I am trying to figure out this JK2 load balancing code and fix the docs.
I need some help verifying some of the coding decisions that have been
made.
Ok, as I dig deeper into the code, I discover the following:
Both worker:AJP13 and channel.socket can have both the level and
lb_factor parameters
-Original Message-
From: Angus Mezick
So, the only relationship between JK lbfactor and JK2
lb_factor is in their names and the fact they have SOMETHING
to do with load balancing.
They definetly don't seem to do the same thing.
I gave you detailed explanation how the lb
Yup, I think I misinterpreted what you said in the email back then. I
wasn't able to rid myself of the assumption that jk lbfactor and jk2
lb_factor behave the same. That assumption is now dead. If you reply
to my email with the series of questions about this I will be happy to
do the docs.
Back to that march 1 post.
1. lb_value += lb_factor
Ok, I see this I think. But this happens after step 2.
2. the highest lb_value gets server;
Am I reading this code wrong, or is it the LOWEST value that is getting
the server
/** Get one worker that is ready
*/
for( level=0;
-Original Message-
From: Angus Mezick
Yup, I think I misinterpreted what you said in the email back
then. I wasn't able to rid myself of the assumption that jk
lbfactor and jk2 lb_factor behave the same. That assumption
is now dead. If you reply to my email with the series
markt 2004/04/09 09:31:29
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime
PageContextImpl.java
Log:
Fixing indents prior to actually changing the code.
Revision ChangesPath
1.58 +6 -7
markt 2004/04/09 09:35:12
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime
PageContextImpl.java
Log:
- Fix bug19049. Clarify error message when nesting exceptions.
- Patch provided by Joseph Shraibman.
Revision ChangesPath
1.59 +2 -1
markt 2004/04/09 09:40:13
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime Tag:
tomcat_4_branch PageContextImpl.java
Log:
Fixing indents prior to actually changing the code.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No
markt 2004/04/09 09:42:29
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime Tag:
tomcat_4_branch PageContextImpl.java
Log:
- Fix bug19049. Clarify error message when nesting exceptions.
- Patch provided by Joseph Shraibman.
- Ported from TC5.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19049.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Henri Gomez wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
ballot
Release 5.0.22 as Stable:
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
/ballot
I've tested the new Windows wrapper, and it did work for me (and it
looks as if we did hire some M$ guy to do its UI). However, some more
testing is needed (note: it's not suppoed to work on Win9x
Peter Rossbach wrote:
ballot
Release 5.0.22 as Stable:
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
/ballot
I vote -1
Autodeploy with HostConfig not working correct with Windows.
see my bug report with a fix.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28262
Windows is a very broken platform, and I don't quite care
Jess Holle wrote:
I'm not a committer, but...
Given the number of did you get _ important fix xyz _? mails, it
seems to make sense to re-tag.
It has been a while since a public release and it would be nice to have
a public release with this latest flurry of fixes (i.e. so maybe the
public
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
I don't think we should relase a stable with a few bugs we can fix
easily,
a lot of people don't read the release notes,
and might start filing bugs against them, so we will lose the time
later
anyway. There were several check ins after the tag, from different
committers,
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
I don't think we should relase a stable with a few bugs we can fix
easily,
a lot of people don't read the release notes,
and might start filing bugs against them, so we will lose the time
later
anyway. There were several check ins after the tag,
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jess Holle wrote:
I'm not a committer, but...
Given the number of did you get _ important fix xyz _? mails,
it seems to make sense to re-tag.
It has been a while since a public release and it would be nice to
have a public release with this latest flurry of fixes
Jess Holle wrote:
Given all the time and energy you put into this Remy, I can completely
understand.
On the flip side, the overall community would be best served by getting
as solid of a point release as possible out sooner rather than later.
If the current 5.0.22 tag is the best you/we have
amyroh 2004/04/09 10:35:33
Modified:webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin
ApplicationResources.properties
Log:
Add missing keys - connector.useBodyEncodingForURI allowTrace.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +2 -0
I'm voting 0 on this, because of one bug I found:
- Logging into Admin webapp, clicking on Connector (8080) brings up an
error page: javax.servlet.jsp.JspException: Missing message for key
connector.useBodyEncodingForURI
I just fixed this. Thanks for pointing it out.
Amy
Amy Roh wrote:
I just fixed this. Thanks for pointing it out.
Thanks. The last String related bug was worse though ;)
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
No problem -- thank YOU for fixing it ;)
And a good weekend to all,
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-Original Message-
From: Amy Roh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 1:39 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: [5.0.22] Release vote
I'm
Amy Roh wrote:
I just fixed this. Thanks for pointing it out.
Thanks. The last String related bug was worse though ;)
Which bug? Sorry, I'm lost.
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Amy Roh wrote:
Which bug? Sorry, I'm lost.
After the i18n patch was committed, there was a leftover _en bundle
which missed all the new strings.
The fix was obviously trivial (remove the older bundle).
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28147.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello Remy,
the fix is also usefull at linux and all other systems
following with current autodeploy host not working
a) copy a webapp at host appBase (webapps dir)
b) remove this new deployed application with manager app
c) copy the same webapp again at host appBase.
Peter
PS: Your
Peter Rossbach wrote:
Hello Remy,
the fix is also usefull at linux and all other systems
following with current autodeploy host not working
a) copy a webapp at host appBase (webapps dir)
b) remove this new deployed application with manager app
c) copy the same webapp again at host
fuankg 2004/04/09 13:00:18
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 NWGNUmakefile
jk/native/apache-2.0 NWGNUmakefile
Log:
fix problem with differences between Apache2 build systems of 2.0.x and 2.1.x
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +1 -7
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28107.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28013.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27582.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28263.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28013.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28321.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28321.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28321.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2004/04/09 14:47:04
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup
ContextConfig.java
Log:
- If there's a non fatal exception (with validation), no exception will be
rethrown by the digester. This will make the webapp startup fail if
Hi Remy,
Remy Maucherat wrote:
The high level summary is nice, but more detail is needed for this
discussion.
What does it mean exactly ?
The RI for the JSR is with PHP ? Does the code work already ? Is it OSS ?
;)
All excellent questions. I think the answer at the moment is that it's
somewhat
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28107.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I will be out of the office starting 04/08/2004 and will not return until
04/12/2004.
I am out of the office. I will respond when I return.
Gary
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Hello,
Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed.
Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp
We apology for the inconvenience.
Best Regards,
--
The DirectXtras Team
-
DirectXtras -
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28323.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello,
Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed.
Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp
We apology for the inconvenience.
Best Regards,
--
The DirectXtras Team
-
DirectXtras -
Please have a look at the attached file.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed.
Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp
We apology for the inconvenience.
Best Regards,
--
The DirectXtras Team
-
DirectXtras -
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28325.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello,
Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed.
Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp
We apology for the inconvenience.
Best Regards,
--
The DirectXtras Team
-
DirectXtras -
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28323.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello,
Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed.
Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp
We apology for the inconvenience.
Best Regards,
--
The DirectXtras Team
-
DirectXtras -
94 matches
Mail list logo
