JK-Proto and CGI-Interface

2004-05-29 Thread Alexander Lazic
Hi, i want to use another webserver then apache but need the possibility to communicate with tomcat-Server. I like the flexibility of mod_jk and asked myself how i can use the JK-Protocol for communication. I haven't found a CGI-Interface programm nor a commandline tool which can 'speak' JK. Is

Re: JK-Proto and CGI-Interface

2004-05-29 Thread newstuff
= EXTREME Funny Pictures Of The Day = Thank You For Emailing EXTREME Funny Pictures! UNSUBSCRIBE INSTRUCTIONS To stop our newsletter, click

respuestas sobre el Chat

2004-05-29 Thread ayudachat
Algunas preguntas frecuentes sobre inconvenientes al ingresar al chat son: Si puede ingresar su Nick en el recuadro de texto pero no inicia la sesión de chat pueder ser por que dicho Nick se encuentre registrado por otra persona en tal caso pruebe cambiarlo o agregarle algún numero.

Out of Office AutoReply: hi

2004-05-29 Thread ZentraleStudienberatung
Sehr geehrte/r Ratsuchende/r, aufgrund eines starken Mailaufkommens kann es zu einer Verzögerung bei der Beantwortung kommen. Ihre Mail bleibt bei uns im Postfach und wird sobald, wie möglich beantwortet. Wenn Sie sich für einen Studienbeginn im Wintersemester 2004/05 interessieren, können Sie

Re: Time for 5.0.26?

2004-05-29 Thread Remy Maucherat
Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, We need to do a new release, 5.0.26, because of http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29255. Does anyone have stuff they're working on, and would therefore like me to wait a couple of days (or more, or less?) before tagging and building? I probably won't have

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29286] - Undeploy App does not delete WAR file

2004-05-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29286. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29242] - Compression should not be chunked if content's size is known

2004-05-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29242. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29259] - Used MX4J 2.0.1 HttpAdpator

2004-05-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29259. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29269] - Session in JSp not available to Servlet

2004-05-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29269. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29274] - WebAppClassLoader does not release loaded classes if webapp is reloaded

2004-05-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29274. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28961] - loggers shift files but don't roll (not deleting oldest files by prescribes file count)

2004-05-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28961. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Time for 5.0.26?

2004-05-29 Thread Remy Maucherat
Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, We need to do a new release, 5.0.26, because of http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29255. Does anyone have stuff they're working on, and would therefore like me to wait a couple of days (or more, or less?) before tagging and building? I probably won't have

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28961] - log4j logger proxy patch

2004-05-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28961. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28961] - log4j logger proxy patch

2004-05-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28961. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28949] - Occasional NoClassDefFoundError for tag classes at startup

2004-05-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28949. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28949] -

2004-05-29 Thread info
Het adres [EMAIL PROTECTED] is voorlopig niet meer in gebruik vanwege grote hoeveelheden virusmails die daarop binnenkomen. Gebruik het nieuwe adres dat op de website staat (linksonder). Excuses voor het ongemak! - To

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28949] - Occasional NoClassDefFoundError for tag classes at startup

2004-05-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28949. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: Time for 5.0.26?

2004-05-29 Thread Filip Hanik \(lists\)
BTW, is it ok if I start my refatoring(s) in a separate branch based on go ahead, refator. :-) --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.676 / Virus Database: 438 - Release Date: 5/3/2004

Re: Time for 5.0.26?

2004-05-29 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 11:29 AM Subject: Re: Time for 5.0.26? Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, We need to do a new release, 5.0.26, because of

[GUMP@brutus]: jakarta-tomcat-5/jakarta-tomcat-5 failed

2004-05-29 Thread bobh
-regexp/build/jakarta-regexp-20040529.jar -Dmail.home=/usr/local/gump/packages/javamail-1.3 -Dant.home=/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist -Dsite2.home=/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2 -Dcommons-collections.jar=/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/collections

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28961] - log4j logger proxy patch

2004-05-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28961. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.