DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Keith Wannamaker wrote:
ballot
The 4.1.31 maintenance release should happen:
[X] Yes
[ ] No
/ballot
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To whom it may satisfy...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tomcat-catalina *no longer* has an issue.
Project State : 'Success'
Full
To whom it may satisfy...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tomcat-5 *no longer* has an issue.
Project State : 'Success'
Full details
To whom it may satisfy...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tomcat-4.0 *no longer* has an issue.
Project State : 'Success'
Full
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p) --
Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Notice.txt
.exe (in Notice.zip)
The uncleanable file
Dear GateLock user,
GateLock has detected the WORM_NETSKY.D in your email attachment
message_details.pif. The file could not be cleaned and was therefore deleted.---BeginMessage---
Your file is attached.
---End Message---
-
To
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30803.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hola,
I think we long ago agreed not to vote -1 just because you want
somebody
to work on a different codebase :-)
It must have been long enough ago that I wasn't here ;) I don't
remember it. Anyways, since is a (non-lazy) majority vote so my -1 is
not a veto, just an opinion. We already had
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30780.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2004/08/23 10:26:09
Added: .RELEASE-PLAN-5.5.txt
Log:
- Add a draft release plan for HEAD.
- It's numbered 5.5, because:
* I think the default packaging should be for J2SE 5.0
* The API isn't compatible with 5.0.x, hence a larger number change
Hola,
I'm ready to cut 5.0.28 once the JSP folks are done with their work. I
think you guys are actually all done and waiting for me, right? Shall
we say this weekend with Friday as the deadline for committing any code
on the TOMCAT_5_0 branch?
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hola,
I'm ready to cut 5.0.28 once the JSP folks are done with their work. I
think you guys are actually all done and waiting for me, right? Shall
we say this weekend with Friday as the deadline for committing any code
on the TOMCAT_5_0 branch?
I'd like to backport the
Hi,
I'd like to backport the service.bat to 5_0 branch.
Not sure what's the agreement on backporting, but I suppose it's RTC.
It has resolved JAVA_HOME and tools.jar issues that many users complain
about, as well as using jvm.dll from JAVA_HOME environment variable.
You will also need to use the
+1
I'd like to add startup scripts that don't use endorsed so that tomcat
5.0.28 can be run on JDK 5.0 if needed to be. People can test it out by
switching the scripts. I'm running TCKs to see if there're any problems but
will commit soon.
Let me know if anyone has issues with this.
Thanks,
markt 2004/08/23 12:29:35
Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java
Log:
Fix bug 16254 - Server header appears twice after a call to response.setHeader()
Revision ChangesPath
1.105 +3 -1
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16254.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
luehe 2004/08/23 12:41:32
Modified:webapps/docs Tag: TOMCAT_5_0 changelog.xml
Log:
Added fix for Bugtraq 6152759
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.70.2.9 +4 -1 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
markt 2004/08/23 12:29:35
Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java
Log:
Fix bug 16254 - Server header appears twice after a call to response.setHeader()
I don't see any use for this. IMO, the server
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
markt
The reporter of the bug was trying to use a filter to override the contents of
the server header and set it to no name. They didn't say so, but I am guessing
there was a security motive behind their actions.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark Thomas wrote:
The reporter of the bug was trying to use a filter to override the contents of
the server header and set it to no name. They didn't say so, but I am guessing
there was a security motive behind their actions.
Well, that's not very convincing. Can't they recompile if they want
From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark Thomas wrote:
The reporter of the bug was trying to use a filter to
override the contents of
the server header and set it to no name. They didn't say
so, but I am guessing
there was a security motive behind their actions.
Well,
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
I'd like to backport the service.bat to 5_0 branch.
Not sure what's the agreement on backporting, but I suppose it's RTC.
It has resolved JAVA_HOME and tools.jar issues that many users complain
about, as well as using jvm.dll from JAVA_HOME environment variable.
You will also
mturk 2004/08/23 15:54:33
Modified:catalina/src/bin Tag: TOMCAT_5_0 service.bat
Log:
Backport from HEAD
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.5.2.1 +20 -6 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/bin/service.bat
I will be out of the office starting 13.08.2004 and will not return until 30.08.2004.
I will respond to your message when I return.
Call me at +41797468083 if urgent.
This e-mail is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. If you
are not the intended recipient, you should
The vote carried. I am aiming for the end of the month for
tagging and building a RC for 4.1.31.
Keith
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jess Holle wrote:
The offer to do this is great, but I am more than a little curious:
Why would anyone bother with a 4.1.x upgrade at this point? 5.0.27 is
faster, more stable, etc, at this point as best I can tell.
Because the 5.0 branch has a memory leak I haven't been able to pin
down, so
I don't know why you want to get rid of endorsed. Sure java 5.0 will
have an up to date xerces, but it will get out of date in the future, so
you might as well keep the endorsed directory.
Amy Roh wrote:
+1
I'd like to add startup scripts that don't use endorsed so that tomcat
5.0.28 can be
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30813.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I'm not getting rid of endorsed. I'm just adding additional scripts so you
have an option to pick up the xml parsers from JDK 5.0 with 5.0.28 release
if you choose to.
The default behavior will be the same.
Amy
I don't know why you want to get rid of endorsed. Sure java 5.0 will
have an up
Michael Dang wrote:
I don't know specifically what you need to record on the server side that is hard to
do on the client side. It depends on what you trying to achieve.
If you need to record in url level, then tools like OpenSTA is sufficient. If you
need to record class loading or method
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30813.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30814.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p) --
Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Informations.txt
.exe (in Informations.zip)
The
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p) --
Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Textfile.txt
.exe (in Textfile.zip)
The uncleanable
37 matches
Mail list logo
