DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34176.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hmm,
I see the following problem with the current session expire strategie.
Today
a) Notify session destroy event
= All session attributes are active
b) Set session as invalid
c) Notify session remove attribute event - Hups
= Now the listener detect IllegalStateExceptions
Peter Rossbach wrote:
Hmm,
I see the following problem with the current session expire strategie.
Today
a) Notify session destroy event
= All session attributes are active
b) Set session as invalid
c) Notify session remove attribute event - Hups
= Now the listener detect
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tomcat-jk-native has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
Hey Remy,
can you please explain why the remove attribute event notification is
wrong when
context is destroy?
Thanks
Peter
Remy Maucherat schrieb:
Peter Rossbach wrote:
Hmm,
I see the following problem with the current session expire strategie.
Today
a) Notify session destroy event
Peter Rossbach wrote:
Hey Remy,
can you please explain why the remove attribute event notification is
wrong when
context is destroy?
Because you're not actually removing them, you're just cleaning up objects.
Did you notice you don't get notifications on start, etc ?
Rémy
remm2005/04/04 04:11:51
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/servlet JspServlet.java
webapps/docs changelog.xml jasper-howto.xml
Log:
- 34272: Add options class configuration.
- Submitted by Scott Stark.
Revision ChangesPath
1.42 +36 -13
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30551.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Good answer!
But why we emit remove session attribute events when sesssion is destroy?
I think the session expire is also a clean up thing and nobody need the
remove attribute events.
Peter
Remy Maucherat schrieb:
Peter Rossbach wrote:
Hey Remy,
can you please explain why the remove attribute
Peter Rossbach wrote:
Good answer!
But why we emit remove session attribute events when sesssion is destroy?
I think the session expire is also a clean up thing and nobody need the
remove attribute events.
Because the stupid wording which explicitely mandates the nonsense for
sessions isn't
Hups,
the remove session attribute events after session destory is documented
at the servlet spec?
Any hint welcome
Peter
Remy Maucherat schrieb:
Peter Rossbach wrote:
Good answer!
But why we emit remove session attribute events when sesssion is
destroy?
I think the session expire is also a
Peter Rossbach wrote:
Hups,
the remove session attribute events after session destory is documented
at the servlet spec?
Any hint welcome
Yes, read the javadoc for HttpSessionBindingListener.
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
remm2005/04/04 06:57:49
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper
EmbeddedServletOptions.java
webapps/docs changelog.xml
.build.properties.default
jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33106.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32296.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34292.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I tried setting the lb worker method=T (Traffic) and found that it was
not being honored.
A review of the code found that the jk_lb_get_method() function is never
being called to set the lb worker-lbmethod.
Is this feature just not enabled yet?
Regards,
Glenn
markt 2005/04/04 13:26:55
Modified:catalina/src/conf web.xml
catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/ssi SSIServlet.java
SSIServletExternalResolver.java
webapps/tomcat-docs ssi-howto.xml
Log:
Fix bug 10385. Improve support for
markt 2005/04/04 13:57:02
Modified:catalina/src/conf web.xml
catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/ssi SSIServlet.java
SSIServletExternalResolver.java
webapps/docs changelog.xml ssi-howto.xml
Log:
Fix bug 10385. Improve
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10385.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi all,
I am from Market Development Engineering department at Sun Microsystems.
I have some questions about tomcat Solaris 10 supports. Could you please
point me to the right person? Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
The message cannot be represented in 7-bit ASCII encoding and has been sent as
a binary attachment.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10026.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
23 matches
Mail list logo