take it

2005-06-28 Thread libero . adsl
your document is not good Norton AntiVirus eliminato1.txt Description: plain/text - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Feature Request: Optional No Cert validation on SSL connector

2005-06-28 Thread jean-frederic clere
Chad La Joie wrote: Hey guys, I was wondering if there were any thoughts on this particular suggestion. I hadn't seen anything on the list. Have you tried to use keystoreType=PKCS12 in the connector? Chad La Joie wrote: Good Morning, I work on the Internet2 Shibboleth project and

Re: Feature Request: Optional No Cert validation on SSL connector

2005-06-28 Thread jean-frederic clere
Chad La Joie wrote: Hey guys, I was wondering if there were any thoughts on this particular suggestion. I hadn't seen anything on the list. BTW: mod-ssl says: +++ In practice only levels none and require are really interesting, because level optional doesn't work with all browsers and

Re: Feature Request: Optional No Cert validation on SSL connector

2005-06-28 Thread Chad La Joie
Yeah, I know what mod-ssl says, and for most cases it's probably right, however the optional_no_ca option is interesting to us because it provides exactly the functionality that we need; accepting the client cert, putting it in a standard place, and allowing our application to do the verification

Re: Feature Request: Optional No Cert validation on SSL connector

2005-06-28 Thread jean-frederic clere
Chad La Joie wrote: Yeah, I know what mod-ssl says, and for most cases it's probably right, however the optional_no_ca option is interesting to us because it provides exactly the functionality that we need; accepting the client cert, putting it in a standard place, and allowing our application

Re: Feature Request: Optional No Cert validation on SSL connector

2005-06-28 Thread Chad La Joie
jean-frederic clere wrote: Chad La Joie wrote: Yeah, I know what mod-ssl says, and for most cases it's probably right, however the optional_no_ca option is interesting to us because it provides exactly the functionality that we need; accepting the client cert, putting it in a standard

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project jakarta-tomcat-catalina (in module jakarta-tomcat-catalina) failed

2005-06-28 Thread bobh
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-catalina has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project jakarta-tomcat-catalina (in module jakarta-tomcat-catalina) failed

2005-06-28 Thread bobh
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-catalina has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project jakarta-tomcat-4.0 (in module jakarta-tomcat-4.0) failed

2005-06-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-4.0 has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project jakarta-tomcat-4.0 (in module jakarta-tomcat-4.0) failed

2005-06-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-4.0 has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue