DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13093] - Compliance Issue - NPE not thrown if a null reference is passed to PageContext.handlePageException(Exception) or PageContext.handlePageException(Throwable).

2005-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13093. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Final phase of SVN migration - the plan

2005-09-20 Thread Mladen Turk
Mark Thomas wrote: All, The plan for the last phase is slightly different since these repositories are in pretty much constant use. I know there is a plan to do a JK release this week. If there is a timing clash, JK takes priority. Just shout and I'll delay giving infra the go-ahead to do

Re: Final phase of SVN migration - the plan

2005-09-20 Thread Remy Maucherat
Mark Thomas wrote: Yoav Shapira wrote: If possible, it'd be nice to establish a quiet window, say 24 hours, during which we shall not commit anything, and infra will do the real repository move. That will help eliminate the possibility of lost/clashed commits and related wasted time.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/tagplugins/jstl/core - New directory

2005-09-20 Thread remm
remm2005/09/20 03:56:41 jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/tagplugins/jstl/core - New directory - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36481] - JSTL tag plugins for Jasper, correct the misusage of the generateImport method

2005-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36481. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36456] - JSTL Tag Plugin for Jasper

2005-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36456. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24942] - Tomcat 5.0.16 / Windows 2000 Service does not start

2005-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24942. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Final phase of SVN migration - the plan

2005-09-20 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, Do we do a new Tomcat 5.0.12 build (which will be voted on this time) before the migration ? We'll have to change build scripts after that, Yes, I'd like to do a new 5.5.12. That's one of the reasons I asked for timings, once they're known, so we can work with nice margins.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36735] New: - Problem with SSL - swf - Explorer

2005-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36735. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Final phase of SVN migration - the plan

2005-09-20 Thread Remy Maucherat
Yoav Shapira wrote: Hi, Do we do a new Tomcat 5.0.12 build (which will be voted on this time) before the migration ? We'll have to change build scripts after that, Yes, I'd like to do a new 5.5.12. That's one of the reasons I asked for timings, once they're known, so we can work with nice

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36681] - 2 Tomcat 5.5.7 clusters come to a grinding hault and generate errors

2005-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36681. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36738] New: - Incorrect character encoding

2005-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36738. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36735] - Problem with SSL - swf - Explorer

2005-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36735. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27122] - IE plugins cannot access components through Tomcat 5 over SSL

2005-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27122. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36540] - pooled cluster replication does not seem ensure synchronized replication in tomcat 5.5.11

2005-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36540. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Final phase of SVN migration - the plan

2005-09-20 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, I'm fine with this WE, or the end of this week. I mean, the previous build was decent already. I just looked at the changelog for 5.5.12, it's a nice collection of stuff. Is Friday OK with everyone? If not, I can do Saturday, but I'd prefer Friday to keep my weekend more free. How

Re: Final phase of SVN migration - the plan

2005-09-20 Thread Mark Thomas
Remy Maucherat wrote: Do we do a new Tomcat 5.0.12 build (which will be voted on this time) before the migration ? We'll have to change build scripts after that, and I also would have to change the way I work with the repository, which could introduce problems. Based on experience with

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36738] - Incorrect character encoding

2005-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36738. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36741] New: - ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException in org.apache.coyote.http11.InternalOutputBuffer.write

2005-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36741. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36741] - ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException in org.apache.coyote.http11.InternalOutputBuffer.write

2005-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36741. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36741] - ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException in org.apache.coyote.http11.InternalOutputBuffer.write

2005-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36741. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36742] New: - Missing diagnostics in InternalInputBuffer on overly long headers

2005-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36742. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36742] - Missing diagnostics in InternalInputBuffer on overly long headers

2005-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36742. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36741] - ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException in org.apache.coyote.http11.InternalOutputBuffer.write

2005-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36741. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36742] - Missing diagnostics in InternalInputBuffer on overly long headers

2005-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36742. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

svn commit: r290557 - /tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/WARNING.txt

2005-09-20 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Sep 20 13:43:25 2005 New Revision: 290557 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=290557view=rev Log: Remove CVS closure warning from SVN. Removed: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/WARNING.txt - To

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/valves RemoteHostValve.java

2005-09-20 Thread markt
markt 2005/09/20 14:02:12 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/valves RemoteHostValve.java Log: Correct JavaDocs. Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +2 -2

svn commit: r290577 - /tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/webapps/tomcat-docs/config/coyote.xml

2005-09-20 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Sep 20 15:19:39 2005 New Revision: 290577 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=290577view=rev Log: Add missing and new options to docs. Modified: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/webapps/tomcat-docs/config/coyote.xml Modified:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34771] - Unable to set maxHttpHeaderSize

2005-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34771. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36121] - Including JSP's changes working directory

2005-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36121. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Final phase of SVN migration - the plan

2005-09-20 Thread Mark Thomas
Mladen Turk wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: I know there is a plan to do a JK release this week. If there is a timing clash, JK takes priority. Just shout and I'll delay giving infra the go-ahead to do the final migration. Please don't get limited with that fact. We can easily release from SVN,

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c

2005-09-20 Thread Tim Whittington
This breaks the build on Windows using Microsoft Visual C++ Toolkit 2003 (at least). It seems #define FOO 0 on WIN32 is still defined according to #ifdef Changing # define JK_NEED_SET_MUTEX_PERMS 0 to # undef JK_NEED_SET_MUTEX_PERMS fixes the problem tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: wrowe

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35298] - Multiple JK/ISAPI redirectors on a single IIS site are not supported

2005-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35298. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35298] - Multiple JK/ISAPI redirectors on a single IIS site are not supported

2005-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35298. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c

2005-09-20 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Tim Whittington wrote: This breaks the build on Windows using Microsoft Visual C++ Toolkit 2003 (at least). It seems #define FOO 0 on WIN32 is still defined according to #ifdef Your suggestion is counterintuitive and reflects, perhaps, a compiler bug. It would be very helpful if you would

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c

2005-09-20 Thread Tim Whittington
Confused me too. Error message is listed below. [exec] cl.exe /nologo /MD /W3 /Zi /O2 /I ..\common /I C:\j2sdk1.4.2_07\include /I C:\j2sdk1.4.2_07\include \win32 /I C:/Program Files/Apache Group/Apache2\include /D NDEBUG /D WIN32 /D _WINDOWS /Fo.\Release\\ /Fd.\R elease\mod_jk_src

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36525] - mod_jk 1.2.14.1 core dump

2005-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36525. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35298] - Multiple JK/ISAPI redirectors on a single IIS site are not supported

2005-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35298. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.