+1
I'm still busy (and have limited times) with mod_jk 1.2.0.
I'd like to polish the documentation before release.
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53
ballot
[X] +1 I support the proposal, and will help implement it
[ ] +0 I support the proposal
[ ] -0 I do not support the proposal
[ ] -1 I am against the proposal being implemented, because:
/ballot
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
Henri: what about tagging the workspace for mod_jk1 with 1.2.0,
and use the same naming convention as in 4.1.x.
How did I take jk/native (only) as mod_jk_1_2_0 ?
cvs tag -r mod_jk_1_2_0 jk/native ?
Nacho, Mladen: same thing for mod_jk2 - we should use the 'milestone'
style, and mod_jk2.0.0
Hi,
I've got many problems to build jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk xdocs
with ant 1.4.1 or 1.5b3 and xalan 2.3.1/xerces 2.0.1 under W2K
(not tested yet under Unix), with Sun JDK 1.3.1_03 :
I tried to downgrade to xerces 2.0.0, but the problem is still
here.
Didn't have such problem when using
: Stephane Bailliez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 12:19 PM
To: Ant Developers List; Tomcat Developers List
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ant/style for xdocs fail randomly
-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Didn't have such problem
into Apache
1.3.x, then
I can confirm that it works just fine. I've been running that
configuration for quite some time now.
Bojan
On Mon, 2002-07-01 at 18:53, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Ok, I'll remove them so, and will update the build documentation
(in xdocs).
BTW, who could tell us more about mod_jk
Who could update the iplanet README ?
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ajp support included in latest ethereal ;)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
Ethereal 0.9.5 has been released. This version
+1
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Hey, it seems Nacho goes to bug hunting in xsl, good news,
since I'm working on using xdocs for jk 1.2.0.
BTW, how could we have xdocs handling at both time between jk and jk2 ?
I was thinking at the following layout :
xdocs
xdocs/common(ajp13)
xdocs/jk1 (buildingap, buildingiis,
I strongly agree with costin, and it has been a point
we discuss many times before with Pier for mod_webapp.
Even if APR is a library used mainly by Apache 2.0,
nothing prevent it to be used elsewhere and for example
under Windows and IIS.
The only problem is that there is still no official
+1.
Bojan
On Fri, 2002-06-28 at 22:39, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Hi,
What about removing all the outdated
makefile and build.platform.sh
present in jk/native now that we
have a working configure/makefile or
ant/jkant ?
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi to all,
I'm finalizing the mod_jk 1.2.0 release.
I updated the Apache build instruction,
removed outdated Makefile and build files.
I added a minimal IIS build document,
from what it's present in tomcat-iis-howto.html.
Same thing for netscape/iplanet build instructions.
Since the
Sorry, It's not much ;)
Not so bad ;)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I was playing with xdocs in jk and tried to use it
to generate both jk and jk2.
I choose the following layout :
xdocs/common(menu.idx, Ajp13.xml)
xdocs/jk(menu.idx, index.xml, building.xml, configtc.xml, configweb.xml)
xdocs/jk2 (menu.idx, index.xml, building.xml,
,
Glenn
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Ok, I think we're near release now.
The last thing to do will be to add documentation,
there is allready README.configure which explains
how to build for apache 1.3/2.0 via configure.
Needed now :
- Configuration for Apache 1.3/2.0
httpd.conf
: GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:53 AM
Subject: RE: chickeneggs and fix TC4/COYOTE/TC4
May be we should add to HEAD (4.1) lib dir all
the required jars from commons ?
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL
+1 for me :)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Ok, I think we're near release now.
The last thing to do will be to add documentation,
there is allready README.configure which explains
how to build for apache 1.3/2.0 via configure.
Needed now :
- Configuration for Apache 1.3/2.0
httpd.conf/workers.properties
- Build procedures for
Available at :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.4/rpms/
More FHS compliant and misc fixes in spec files.
Important change from previous version, is that
the rpm didn't use no more IBM SDK 1.3.1 as
default SDK. Read the following RPM info :
---
This part of code in jk 1.2/2.0 is really a spaghetti :[
I spent many times in it, and I think we should refactor it
at least in jk2.
Certainly after aplha release.
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD
Thanks for the encouraged news. We've been using Tomcat in
our product
for a while now. Now, I need to set it up with support for
minimum 100K
simultaneous connection to our server side.
100K simultaneous connection !
I doubt any hardware/software/os (even on high system)
could
Here are the diffs against TC 4.0 HEAD.
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri
I answered yesterday on tomcat-user.
JkAutoMount was a planned features of ajp13++ (ajp14)
protocol, and will be available (if possible) only
via jk2 (jtc/jk/native2 and java part)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY :
I don't have any chicken and eggs problems when building.
till you have allready built jar in lib dir (TC4)
ant clean; ant
works very well for me, and builds all sub components like Coyote.
- jtc-util is built first
- then Catalina
- then Coyote and the other protocol handlers
What is the
Which commons-logging is using? from b.p.s i see that is requesting a
commons-logging 1.0.1, where is that binary?
in TC4/lib (regexp, ajp, util, coyote, http11)
If as i suppouse it's simply the binary of building HEAD of c-l..
Could anybody put all those needed jars available somewhere, to
At least in TC 4.0.4
Oh, ok, I understand now. Yes, there's a chicken and egg problem with
4.0.4. The binaries for Coyote are actually committed in the CVS to
avoid it.
That's why I added a condition to copy.
In HEAD, it works good, OTOH, because it actually follows the build
sequence you
: GOMEZ Henri
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 6:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: jspc patch for TC 3.3.2
Hi,
One of my coworker have some problems with jspc
when included jsp got a relative path.
Find attached a possible patch.
Thanks to comment and commit if
valid.
-
Henri Gomez
Message -
From: GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Tomcat Users
List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 5:27 AM
Subject: tomcat 4.0.4 rpm release
Available at :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.
0.4/rpms
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I allways use read/write on Unix instead of recv/send.
It works way better.
Why better?
recv/send on BS2000 goes directly to the network through the
socket libraries
and read/write does with an additional POSIX layer.
Hi JF,
History, history ;)
I switched from recv/send
Contributed documentation for jk2
PS: Note the info that Jetty will also implements ajp13 :)
-Original Message-
From: Simon Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:24 AM
To: GOMEZ Henri
Subject: Re: Configuring mod_jk2
Attached is a copy of the notes
-
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 6:13 PM
To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
Subject: RE: mod_jk cache and socket timeout
-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24. lipanj 2002 18:10
To: Tomcat Developers List
If you replay the bench many times, you'll see that
the number will change a little.
Not a performance gain, a sort of chaos-random addition ;)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP
I'm also very interested in hearing more about Tomcat HA.
Speaking about HIGH AVAILABILITY, is linked to
reliability and scalabitity.
reliability should be provided by Tomcat core but
scalability should be provided by some sorts of
software between end-user and Tomcat's core.
As I said
Available at :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.4/rpms/
This rpm use external rpms from the Jpackage Project (http://www.jpackage.org)
Only needed binary rpm will be present in jakarta rpms directory :
jakarta-commons-logging-1.0.1.cvs20020612-1jpp.noarch.rpm
We add a timeout features in mod_jk 1.2.0 to close
sockets after some time of inactivity
:)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F
Pier could you detail what should be a Tomcat HA, and how
it could fit in TC 5.0 proposal ?
As far as I can remember it was voted -1...
What about TC 5.0 with HA capability ?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I allways use read/write on Unix instead of recv/send.
It works way better.
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original
...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: Martin van den Bemt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 8:06 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: mod_jk 1.2.0 release news
On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 18:36, GOMEZ Henri wrote
Craig... One question: have you ever worked on a site that
ONLY IN SERVLET
REQUESTS does something like 10 MILLIONS requests a day (and
you have to be
called out at 3 AM on a Saturday morning because things don't work?)
Pier, I also works in production environment and make my best to
avoid
Not _that_ obvious... Do we have _NUMBERS_ ??? And not just
numbers in terms
of reqs/sec, but also in comparison to a long-run test with %
of CPU time
used, and IO usage (uptime)...
It is impossible ( IMHO ) to put some real number on
that ( or on 'cleaner code' or 'better community' ).
How
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common
jk_channel_socket.c
You may use #idef WIN32 in order to choose one or the other solution.
-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL
Thanks to track tomcat-dev and wait for release announce
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From:
Hi Amy,
I'll do the french translation :)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: Amy Roh
Good... Prove it to me. Come up with a proposal of some
friggin' sort...
FWIW even 4.2.x doesn't address any of my concerns, and it's
not even out
working yet... Talking about 5.0 is a little bit premature maybe?
But that's my vision... The vision of an old fart who has been
around for
quite
So I think that both Tomcats should be considered stable.
My officemates thank you for the 5 minutes of hysterical
laughter you gave
to us in this bright radiant sunny morning in London... Much
appreciated..
It was a pleasure ;)
If your site is built up by HelloWorldExample servlets, then,
Bah... If you guys stop being ridiculous and come up with a
proposal that is
something more than a couple of buzzwords, I'll shut up...
(Hint Hint) :)
Excuse me Pier, but when I see that you, an OSS developper,
long time Apache Member, one of the original JServ author
and member of the Tomcat
Ok... Now you said (correct me if I'm wrong), that your site
has 5000/1
servlets request per day, right?
My setup is for more than ONE clients, many clients, many JVM,
many tomcats, but with an average of 5000/1 reqs by client
site by days.
And now you say that to handle that load,
Excuse me Pier, but when I see that you, an OSS developper,
long time Apache Member, one of the original JServ author
and member of the Tomcat 4.x development team member use at
works ServletExecAS/4.1 (http://uptime.netcraft.com/)
instead of any of products he developped, he make me laugth
-
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22. lipanj 2002 18:06
To: GOMEZ Henri
Subject: mod_jk cache and socket timeout
Hi Henri,
Here is the Jan Singer's socket timeout patch with added
cache timeout (since its not in the tree already). Still
don't like the time
: GOMEZ Henri
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:21 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: RE: mod_jk cache and socket timeout
Henri thinks we should discuss that here, so I'm forwarding
the original mail.
Sure that's OSS way ;)
Basically I don't like the time. The alternative is to use something
like
The APR on unix for apr_time_now() uses gettimeofday, and then we could
use the timeval's tv_sec, and on WIN32 GetTickCount, since all that
matters is the time interval.
gettimeofday may cost a little bit more and it's not necessary
to have tv_usec for timeout count in seconds or minutes.
For
The APR on unix for apr_time_now() uses gettimeofday, and
then we could
use the timeval's tv_sec, and on WIN32 GetTickCount, since all that
matters is the time interval.
gettimeofday may cost a little bit more and it's not
necessary to have tv_usec for timeout count in seconds or
+1 at both, if my opinion matters ;-)
Yes, it count.
So Mladen, let's go and commit.
We all three (others welcomed) will make another stress-test
operation tomorrow.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
First some things about testing:
DO NOT USE the date.jsp (it could return various html lengths, so from
there are coming those Failed requests ).
I've just browsed through the source code of ab and it uses the first
page as its length ethalon, and date.jsp could retur various length if
the tests
The issue is not how many requests mod_jk/Tomcat can handle.
The issue is that you end up over time with as many AjpConnector
threads being created by Tomcat as you have apache httpd processes
regardless of how many requests are forward on to Tomcat to process.
For example, I have apache running
Think we can close that!
Ouf.
I've created the worker pool modifiable through workers.properties with
the worker.ajp13.poolsize.
Good
The sadest thing is that I was so close the solution on day 0 (remember
the mutexes?).
Well what ever!
ok
There is some minor bug when using loglevel=debug,
A big +1 for that draft.
Things I'd like to see in TC 5.0.
Delegation:
don't decode full HTTP headers until
user code ask for (ie locales(), ssl certs)
It will make TC 5.0 faster (less request processing
time, less objets creation/recycling).
Extended JMX support:
TC 5.0 should be
I started take a look at patches,
but I didn't like the Sleep(10).
Why did you put a Sleep only in Windows case ?
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53
sleep(#seconds)
or
usleep(#microseconds)
No the real problem is with using a sleep in
network code, I didn't like it.
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8
-
From: Ignacio J. Ortega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 5:27 PM
To: 'Mladen Turk'; 'Tomcat Developers List'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; GOMEZ Henri
Subject: RE: mod_jk testing (WAS RE: mod_jk 1.2.0 workers pool)
Ahhh, finally got to do the test on a capable machine, but very
Hi,
One of my coworker have some problems with jspc
when included jsp got a relative path.
Find attached a possible patch.
Thanks to comment and commit if
valid.
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD
Ok, I restarted the test using ab against
Apache 1.3/2.0 and Tomcat 3.3.1 and 4.0.4.
Status/Stability :
I stressed latest jk 1.2.0 with ab using 127
concurrents requests, asking for 1 Million requests
for the good old HelloWorldExample servlet
(Mladen discovered a problem
I stressed latest jk 1.2.0 with ab using 127
concurrents requests, asking for 1 Million requests
for the good old HelloWorldExample servlet
(Mladen discovered a problem with ab with dynamic
content-length)
I didn't have any error now, with any
combinaison of Apache 1.3/2.0 and
Tomcat
I hope that Tomcat 5.0 proposal draft won't turn in
a battle or flame war between Tomcat and Avalon commiters.
Why ?
Because we had just too many flams wars in tomcat-dev
between tomcat 3.3 and tomcat 4.x teams.
Tomcat 5.0 appears to be a way to have both teams
works again together to make a
What about those forced closed connections, and not closed sockets?
You're right, there is still more jk_open_connection calls
than jk_close_connection. Could you try to figure and fix that ?
I'll try, or consider that done :-).
Ok, I consider it will be fixed on Monday ;-)
--
To
Or the better way could be to copy CoyoteRequest code.
But there will be 3 copy of Accept-Language decoding
in TC 4.x, may be it should be placed elsewhere and
useable by HttpProcessor, CoyoteRequest and AJP13
(may be tomcat-util ?)
For Jk2, TC 4.x already is using a CoyoteRequest, so you
that's the file that exists in the directory.
Bojan
On Tue, 2002-06-18 at 19:58, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
question.
Should mod_jk forward to tomcat index.jsp or index.vm ?
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD
Agreed... If we start invalidating sessions when too much memory is
wasted, I'm going to choose a different servlet engine for
my 10m req/day
site... :) If I define that a session has a timeout, I want
that timeout to
be _real_ and if I run into memory problems, well, that's my
problem, not
I apologize. It is never fair to take out one's frustrations
on another.
Ok, I could understand your language problem and I'll try to
fix it.
The problem is that TC 4.0.4 is out, and that patch may need
a corrected tarball for connectors (and tomcat-ajp.jar)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Yes, pretty much. I'm guessing that Apache will try it's own page types
first (index.shtml, index.html etc.) and if if doesn't find any, pass
the request to Tomcat (through mod_jk) for index.jsp and then index.vm
(in that order, since that's how it's specified in DirectoryIndex).
Just for the
Hum, I think the problem should be easier to detect (I hope so)
Yeah, I agree. I actually think that my configuration could be screwed
somewhere, somehow (although I don't see how) because almost all Apache
2.0.x/Tomcat 3.3.x users would run into this kind of problem...
Not sure. In fact many
While trying to rebuild tomcat4 ajp stuff from latest JTC CVS,
I got the following error, while trying to build against the TC 4.0.4
Buildfile: build.xml
init:
[echo] Coyote 1.0-dev
prepare:
static:
report-tc4:
[echo] Tomcat4 detected
report-tc33:
question.
Should mod_jk forward to tomcat index.jsp or index.vm ?
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original
Error: 500
Location: /examples/jsp/dates/date.jsp
Erreur interne de servlet:
org.apache.jasper.JasperException: Unable to compile
Found 31 semantic errors compiling
/home/root/jakarta-tomcat-3.3/dist/tomcat/work/DEFAULT/examples/jsp/dates/date_1.java:
3. import javax.servlet.*;
Ok, before releasing just take a look at what is still open
and could be fixed quickly ...
And i doubt that they will show up in tc33, i know very well
i_r.dll works.. POST data in SSL, query strings and so on,
they all are very basic errors.. so it seems they belong to
the AJP13
...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:15 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: No more jsp build with TC 3.3.2 from CVS
Error: 500
Location: /examples/jsp/dates/date.jsp
Which make me think we need a stable tarball/jar/zip
for servlet-api4
+1, I dislike having download the latest nightly
snapshot in build docs. But how does that happen?
May be by creating release in :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-servletapi-4/
And put signed source/binary
: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 2:39 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Ok, before releasing just take a look at what is still open
and could be fixed quickly ...
And i doubt that they will show up in tc33, i know very well
i_r.dll works
5975 Nor isSecure and getScheme: http are not set when using SSL
;) JFC reported this one so.. please can you expand ??
Still only in TC4/AJP implemtation ?
I have retested it with TC4.
Could you give me more details about how you get :
cipher_suite:
key_size:
ssl_session:
BTW, I
I find it unusual that a European would not fix such a crucial
piece of code
for localization of applications.
Thanks god there is many europeans commiters on tomcat to
try to fix these problems.
This defect was reported in March
And will be corrected in June by a French commiter.
BTW, ajp13
](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 6:39 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: RE: [Bug 6832] - Locale of the browser is ignored by the AJP13
connector
I hope it will fix my jsp error reported today ;)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From:
From what I see Locales need to be set in Ajp13 using
decoding stuff present (parseAcceptLanguage) in HttpProcessor
or in CoyoteRequest.java (parseLocalesHeaders).
What's the preferred way ?
Or the better way could be to copy CoyoteRequest code.
But there will be 3 copy of Accept-Language
+1
Welcome on board
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: Kin-Man Chung [mailto:[EMAIL
Could you retry with a more recent mod_jk 1.2.0
(jtc/native) from jakarta-tomcat-connectors ?
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: Christopher K. St. John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 7:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PROPOSAL] Minor fix for servletapi-4 GenericServlet
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I propose you
Very strange behaviour.
I didn't understand why the log cause a segv when JkLogLevel
is in INFO mode, whereas there is less log activity.
It could be in jk_log, or all others *printf routines.
Did ap_psprintf is used to core with %s and NULL string
passed ?
-Original Message-
From:
conf=/export/home2/tomcat/jakarta-tomcat-4.1/dist/conf/jk2.properties
XXX native so
/export/home2/tomcat/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/build/jk2/apache
2/mod_jk2.so
ld.so.1:
/export/home2/tomcat/j2sdk1_3_1_03/bin/../bin/sparc/native_threads/java
: fatal: relocation error: file
I was building a commons-logging 1.1 rpm from cvs and the build.xml
still contains component.version = 1.0-dev.
Normal ?
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8
904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 3:59 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: RE: [4.0.4] Binaries available
I was building a commons-logging 1.1 rpm from cvs and the build.xml
still contains component.version = 1.0-dev.
Normal ?
-
Henri
The bug is for mod_jk, not jk2. We use sprintf there, and that
is probably
the problem.
If we can get a stack trace we can easily find the offending log()
and add a check for null.
I'll add a small macro and start adding it to all log(), to be
sure.
I take a look around but didn't
OK, I'll try to do the RM for mod_jk 1.2.0
(after all I asked for this release)
I'll check all open bugs in bugzilla and sort what
are revelants to jk 1.2.0 and what to 2.0.0.
Since mod_jk (and jtc) are now revelants to both
tomcat3/tomcat4, what about creating a jtc entry
in bugzilla to have
I was wondering if anyone in the Tomcat group has read this
document and what their opinion or official statement was.
http://radio.weblogs.com/0107789/stories/2002/05/28/isTomcatCrap.
html
We are in the process of deploying our application and trying to
determine the best servlet engine for
love apt-get ( the RPM version ), it saves you a lot
of time ( unfortunately not too many sources ).
Costin
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
BTW, all required OSS rpms needed to build tc 4.1.3
are available at jpackage.org :
TC 4.1.3 rpm should be out really soon ...
-
Henri
1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:20 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?
+1 for mod_jk 1.2.0 for Apache 1.3.24. It's been running stable on my
systems for a really long time
This should fix the problem reported by Bojan.
What about tagging jtc for jk_1_2_0 release ?
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
I was having problems with JNI worker, internal tomcat 3.3
test hang tomcat AFAIK.
Urg, who could help in JNI/TC3.3 ?
we need some time to test jk 1.2 under IIS..
You're the boss here ;)
AFAIK there is some problems with file names, the given reg
file, docs and binaries has different names
I'd like to check in some (fairly minor) fixes to
jakarta-servletapi-4 and jakarta-watchdog-4.0, but I don't have
the karma. Is it a big deal to get added?
Will you apply some patches to jakarta-servletapi-4 code ?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
I was having problems with JNI worker, internal tomcat 3.3
test hang tomcat AFAIK.
Urg, who could help in JNI/TC3.3 ?
Can we just put it in the release notes, and focus on the
jni worker in jk2 ? ( i.e. people who use the JNI worker with
modjk1.1 should not upgrade ).
This affects only
1 - 100 of 1169 matches
Mail list logo
