Please witch over to tomcat-user for discussion. This is not really a
developer issue.
=== My previous comments (bugzilla) ===
First hints from my side: reduce to equal number of apache and tomcat
instances, configure F5 with rule that sends URLs with session cookie or
jsessionid in URL to
I encourage you for voting 1.2.15 as stable.
Mladen Turk wrote:
Anyhow, I would like that we vote this (1.2.15) version as stable,
because it's a bug-fix release over the 1.2.14 stable.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Hi Peter, Mladen and all others,
I would like to follow Mladens suggestion from earlier this month to
create a list of precise use cases for the load balancing, failover and
administrative downtime scenarios. I think from that we might end up by a
better understandable overal lb design. I expect,
Both users tried with CVS head and the patch works for IRIX and Solaris.
No objections to releasing.
Hi,
There has been couple of major bug fixes
against 1.2.14, see:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/changelog.html
They have been fixed in the CVS, and since
couple of them
Hi,
for the patch 36020 I had a look at MemoryUserDatabase and although the
patch is already committed (Thanks!) I wanted to discuss a few things:
1) The close() for the MemoryUserDatabase is never called,
especially not during shutdown of tomcat. Anyone with a good hint, where
to look for
Hi,
I wonder, why
/org/apache/catalina/users/MemoryUserDatabaseFactory.java
saves the MemoryUserDatabase directly after opening it:
public Object getObjectInstance(Object obj, Name name, Context
nameCtx, Hashtable environment) throws Exception {
...
// Return the configured
to be written during startup).
Rainer
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi,
I wonder, why
/org/apache/catalina/users/MemoryUserDatabaseFactory.java
saves the MemoryUserDatabase directly after opening it:
public Object getObjectInstance(Object obj, Name name, Context
nameCtx
The page
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.5-doc/index.html
is missing position 23) APR in the listed User Guide menu. Any subpage
includes number 23 on it's own submenu. It is also included in the 5.5.10
download, only missing on the internet top level doc page.
Please add
lia
Hi,
the release status of TC 5.0 is a little unclear:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/status.html
states:
Tomcat 5.0.29 was released on October 6th, 2004. Work on the 5.0 branch is
primarily for maintenance and bug fixes. It is still considered the best
branch for production
the packet sniff.
- without any stress on the target system the connect alredy comes back
with rc/errno=0 (success) and no select is done.
Regards,
Rainer
Rainer Jung wrote:
I could help with Solaris info. If you tell me, what you are interested
in, I can do some tests.
Build, socket_timeout
Hi,
I could help with Solaris info. If you tell me, what you are interested
in, I can do some tests.
Regards,
Rainer
Mladen Turk wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
I suspect that most of them are invalid/already fixed bug would be
grateful if you could take a look.
Hi,
Yes, most are fixed. Other I
.
Regards,
Rainer
Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi,
I could help with Solaris info. If you tell me, what you are
interested in, I can do some tests.
Build, socket_timeout and JkShmFile.
Regards,
Mladen.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
in the end, it might also be corrected after 1.2.9.
3) in common/jk_connect.c in method jk_is_socket_connected the second
argument timeout is never used.
4) Still need to test functionality of socket_timeout under Solaris.
Regards,
Rainer
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi,
I could help with Solaris info
2) The test in configure about functionality of the timeouts is broken.
The test program does not compile under Solaris, because it needs
-lsocket.
Can you provide a patch for that?
How about:
*** configure.in.orig Thu Mar 17 17:00:36 2005
--- configure.inThu Mar 17 21:28:29 2005
So I don't see the point of forking 1.3. Both config and core features
are the same. Of course some advanced configuration properties where
changes, lot new added, but from the outside its still old mod_jk.
OK, understood from below. I agree concerning JNI deprecation. But read
comments about
Hi,
first: thanks a lot to Mladen for adding all the beautiful features [and
removing CRLF :) ]. Big leap forward!
I think that until Monday we were still in the progress of adding
features, and fixing bugs. 1.2.8 changed a lot internally, but most was
functionally compatible to 1.2.6. Release
I have the impression you fixed the jvmRoute in the new Session(-Id) in
ManagerBase, but not in DeltaManager? Even when the context is
distributable one might prefer to stick the session to the node where it
now originates.
Furthermore: I did not really understand the use case of
I'm afraid that change will have negative implications: The jvmRoute is
used to enable routing decisions by balancing components. All these
components usually support routing either COOKIE-based or URI-based.
In the URI-based case it is more or less the only clean way to include
the jvmRoute
goes wrong. The only time it goes wrong is for
AOL users who can change gateway between HTTP and HTTPS
Filip
- Original Message -
From: Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 10:39 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Proposed
Upgrading mod_jk would be possible (not too complicated), but I'm afraid
we are going to break other products we don't control the way we do with
mod_jk.
mod_jk is a good example to see, why it's not unlikely that changes
would be needed for other balancers.
Rainer
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip
Both Cluster Managers (Delta and SimpleTcpReplication) extend ManagerBase
but override createSession().
Maybe Filip or Peter can check how to make them long-time compatible with
your proposal?
Managers extending ManagerBase should work and compile as before with no
changes unless they override
Hi,
while trying to improve parts of the mod_jk documentation I made some
observations concerning mod_jk's jk/native/common/jk_uri_worker_map.c I
wanted to discuss. I'm willing to provide patches but wanted to get some
opinions first.
I find the JkMount worker map decision code very difficult to
+1
Although not being a commiter I want to support your work with an
informal +1. I appreciate calling it 1.2.7-beta due to the amount of
code being changed.
Rainer
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
There has been lots of changes in the JK,
and I'd like to tag and release 1.2.7-beta tomorrow.
Any
I would be pleased to use rotatelogs, but it doesn't work with
mod_jk.log (at least not last time I checked).
David Rees wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote, On 11/14/2004 7:31 AM:
0) Any ideas on rotating the mod_jk log file?
Use cronolog http://cronolog.org/ or the rotatelogs program included
CustomLog rotatelogs works, but there is no obvious way
to combine CustomLog with JkLogFile.
Mladen Turk wrote:
David Rees wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote, On 11/14/2004 7:31 AM:
0) Any ideas on rotating the mod_jk log file?
Use cronolog http://cronolog.org/ or the rotatelogs program included
with Apache
Hi Mladen,
0) Any ideas on rotating the mod_jk log file?
4) Open Problem
This should work now with the latest patches.
Excellent! Actually I tried to understand the new principles. Using an old
style paper computer I can see that the values for lb_value are periodic.
But I must confirm, that
Forgot to attach the patch for the overload feature. It is attached now.*** mod_jk.c.1.52 Sun Nov 14 15:00:20 2004
--- mod_jk.c.1.52.overload Sun Nov 14 15:18:59 2004
***
*** 38,43
--- 38,46
#include util_script.h
#include util_date.h
#include
was not really solving the problem.
It looks like one should virtually add load to a worker, even during
it's error time, so that it will get normal load after recovering.
Thanks for any comments!
Rainer
Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Mladen, hi everyone,
i have a proposal for a slight
like one should virtually add load to a worker, even during
it's error time, so that it will get normal load after recovering.
Thanks for any comments!
Rainer
Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Mladen, hi everyone,
i have a proposal for a slight enhancement concerning the log format of
mod_jk
Hi Mladen, hi everyone,
i have a proposal for a slight enhancement concerning the log format of
mod_jk. Maybe you could consider including it in your recently revised
code. It contains only changes to jk_util.c and I attach a patch relativ
to version 1.32 of the file.
1) Include the log level
Hi,
thanks for accepting the authentication patch for the mx4j JMX adapter.
Are you going to apply it to the 5.0 branch too? That would be nice.
Have a nice weekend
Rainer Jung
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
revision 1.28. I hope this is still up to date.
Thank's for considering.
Rainer Jung
--- jk_util.c Tue Jul 13 15:58:10 2004
+++ jk_util.c.new Thu Aug 12 18:11:50 2004
@@ -85,6 +85,14 @@
const char * jk_log_fmt = JK_TIME_FORMAT;
+int log_level_max = 3;
+static const char *log_levels
to the endorsed directory of tomcat.
Furthermore the previously missing data now is included in the result
pages.
Thanks for considerung
Rainer Jung
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
code n JkMx.java to parse 3 additional configuration options
from jk2.properties to the connector:
mx.authMode
mx.authUser
mx.authPassword
The patch is very local and simple. It is based on the newest version of
JkMX.java. Thank for considering.
Rainer Jung
% diff -w -c JkMX.java.orig JkMX.java
I think there is no clear explanation of the TC4 support situation on
the tomcat web site. Maybe to be fair to users you should start by
adding statements, that TC 5 is the preferred version and TC 4 is soon
to be supported only for major bugs and security patches. Furthermore
you could
installation and runtime instance.
Rainer Jung
kippdata informationstechnologie
George Sexton wrote:
How about stopping support for that scenario? I mean drop
the CATALINA_BASE versus CATALINA_HOME feature, (or set them
to always equal each other, if we want to leave them in the
code base
I have a proposal for a slight enhancement concerning the log format of
mod_jk.
1) Include the log level of a message in the log line. That should be
easy and is very helpful to find relevant messages. It is pretty standard.
2) Include the PID of the logging process in the log file. That helps
Concerning session stickyness: is the following scenario possible with
your mod_proxy, at least in the future?
We support a critical high load application which is running in a two
cell environment.
We replicate via TC cluster locally inside each cell (2 TCs) but not
over the boundaries of
Graham Leggett wrote:
Ideally tomcat should be able to pass to httpd info like hey, there is
a new server in the pool, and it's called foo or do me a favour, I'm
being taken out of the pool, so don't send me any new requests.
Config of httpd would be as simple as
ProxyPass /myWebapp
is still alive.
Any plans (or work already done) to refactor JkMain/JkMX for 5.next?
Rainer Jung
Exception during start:
2004-07-26 12:37:58,929 (main) org.apache.jk.common.JkMX/ERROR: Can't
load the MX4J http adapter
javax.management.InstanceAlreadyExistsException: Http:name=HttpAdaptor
Henri Gomez wrote:
Thanks to check if it works for you with the latest jk in CVS...
... and I think we expect the new 1.2.6 release soon. So either wait for
the new release - or even better: send feedback on the CVS as soon as
possible.
As I started the discussion thread on releasing mod_jk 1.2.6 a few days
ago, I would also prefer to have the stable code released and not adding
new features. Releasing 1.2.6 as-is would already be benefitial to many
people.
Henri: thank you very much for preparing the release.
For post-1.2.6
purposes people need an official release.
The last changes in the native jk code is more then 6 weeks old and
there is no code change activity at the moment. So this might be a good
point in time to release mod_jk 1.2.6.
Looking forward for positive feedback
Rainer Jung
TC clustering uses GZIP(In|Out)putStream in replication. I don't know,
if there is buffering on top. Filip?
Rainer
Martin Schulz wrote:
OT: The following is advice to servlet developers rather than container
developers.
For what it's worth, just be careful when you use GZIP(In|Out)putStream,
).
In this stack dump you should be able to figure out, in which methods
most of your threads stay and what the status is.
Is there native code included (via JNI)? Any synchronization done in the
application itself? Are you using Tomcat clustering? Which JVM?
Sincerely
Rainer Jung
Martin Schulz wrote:
Can
Rainer Jung
kippdata informationstechnologie
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
an indication. You only need to put tomcat there,
you can still leave IIS on Windows as the webserver.
Rainer Jung
At 17:31 19.12.01 , you wrote:
Make sure you don't have lots of logging turned on. Tomcat logs message
don't get written to the log files immediately. They go into a queue in
memory and a low
technical details about your setup.
Rainer Jung
At 12:01 27.08.01 , you wrote:
Hi.
We are developing a crucial site with payment options.
We need to do server side session handling a lot.
We have implemented the same using JSP/Bean and default sessionobjects of
the webserver. We assume
of Output
Clients Performance
100 530 JSP/sec
200 370 JSP/sec
Again seperated, but variable Number of CPUs, no Sleep, 25 Bytes Size of Output
CPUs Performance
4 500 JSP/sec
2 510 JSP/sec
1 415 JSP/sec
Rainer Jung
kippdata informationstechnologie GmbH
Bornheimer Straße 33a
make sure the response belongs to the right request.
In the apache 1.3 szenario, the id would have to be generated by mod_jk!
Any comments?
Rainer Jung
kippdata informationstechnologie GmbH
Bornheimer Straße 33a
53111 Bonn
Tel.: 0228/98549-0
Fax: 0228/98549-50
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
you would
have to prepare to use the protocol handlers any way.
Rainer Jung
At 08:49 30.05.01 , you wrote:
I have just installed TC3.2.2 final, and URI Rewiting won't work over
mod_ssl
and apache.
without ssl it works fine, also.
I have set the TOMCAT_HOME and the JAVA_HOME... but it won't work
Hi,
did you get any answers?
I would be very interested if anybody investigated your problem. If not
consider logging a bug tu bugzilla.
Rainer Jung
At 18:33 20.05.01 , you wrote:
Hi!
it will be best if I describe our configuration at first:
We are running Solaris 7, Tomcat 3.2.2 b4 (beta
If 100 is a constraint for the pool size, it should be stated in the Tomcat
User's manual, since there it is explained how to increase the pool, but no
max is given.
I observed Exceptions when using more than 100 threads in the pool, coming
from one or two arrays which have fixed size 100 in
Sincerely
Rainer Jung
kippdata informationstechnologie GmbH
Bornheimer Strae 33a
53111 Bonn
Tel.: 0228/98549-0
Fax: 0228/98549-50
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
54 matches
Mail list logo