Anyway, I agree with Rob. I would like to see a committer
bring at least
#1 to a vote at this point. That way we can at least get the
From Craig and Pier, we have a negative on the applicability of TC3-TC4
docs. I believe Henri thinks otherwise. Would any other knowledgeable
parties care
I was off the list for a while. I tried to read through the
archives but all
the vitriol gave me a headache. Did they just agree to
disagree? Do you
think there'll be a problem with proposing to remove the 3.2
docs from the site?
From what I remember, 3.3 is a major refactoring of
For the record, I'm going to keep track of the different proposals in a
separate doc. For the TC docs - what to include, the glue, etc.
I'm no longer participating in the how do we store it or what format do we
use discussion =)
- r
-Original Message-
From: Martin van den Bemt
How about (Web?) Application Developers' Guide, to more
closely map to the
servlet spec terminology. For the other bit, maybe Container
Architecture Guide.
I think we should avoid the phrase Tomcat Developer since,
as this mailing list
proves, many application developers think that
On pg. 107 of the JSP spec, it says that
out = pageContext.popBody();
is executed after doAfterBody() when SKIP_BODY is returned, but before
doEndTag().
So this means that all I have to do is return SKIP_BODY from doAfterBody()
and the processed (unmodified in my case) body content will be
Who's doing docs nowadays?
Mike B, are you still reading tomcat-dev?
- r
I've only recently re-subscibed to the user list, but so far, since last
summer, the average quality of question seems way down. I guess it's a
testament to Tomcat's increasing popularity. People think, oh, Tomcat!
then they come here and email to the user list, How do i install and
configure
