Re: [5.0] Three proposals

2004-01-23 Thread Remy Maucherat
Remy Maucherat wrote: Here are some new proposals. 2) Bug 26010. Doh, '_' is a useful character in URIs. Big mistake from me :-( I plan to use the '#' character instead, which is not useable in a URI. 3) New connector shutdown. There is a problem with the current Tomcat shutdown order. It

Re: [5.0] Three proposals

2004-01-21 Thread Remy Maucherat
Jess Holle wrote: Any and all performance improvements would be greatly appreciated. For those who have not seen it, Sun is touting their SunONE is better performed / more scalable than Apache 2 + Tomcat benchmark. While Tomcat and mod_jk[2]'s sole goal is not to scale and perform every bit

Re: [5.0] Three proposals

2004-01-21 Thread Peter Lin
As usual, these types of comparisons aren't really useful or even desirable. I remember there used to be a benchmark JSR, but it was with drawn. one of these days, a standard set of web and ejb benchmark apps should be created. that way, instead of the usual simple jsp tests, the performance

Re: [5.0] Three proposals

2004-01-21 Thread Jess Holle
Remy Maucherat wrote: Jess Holle wrote: Any and all performance improvements would be greatly appreciated. For those who have not seen it, Sun is touting their SunONE is better performed / more scalable than Apache 2 + Tomcat benchmark. While Tomcat and mod_jk[2]'s sole goal is not to scale

Re: [5.0] Three proposals

2004-01-21 Thread Jess Holle
In general, I agree that general benchmarks are useless and can be slanted towards any alternative you choose. Also I agree that Tomcat generally seems to perform quite well and reliably. -- Jess Holle Peter Lin wrote: As usual, these types of comparisons aren't really useful or even

[5.0] Three proposals

2004-01-20 Thread Remy Maucherat
Here are some new proposals. 1) Optimization of the session implementation. The session is not a thread safe object. In Tomcat, the session implementation is partially thread safe for some reason (this has been like that since Tomcat 4.0, AFAIK). As a result, we can remove some

Re: [5.0] Three proposals

2004-01-20 Thread Jess Holle
Remy Maucherat wrote: Here are some new proposals. 1) Optimization of the session implementation. The session is not a thread safe object. In Tomcat, the session implementation is partially thread safe for some reason (this has been like that since Tomcat 4.0, AFAIK). As a result, we can

Re: [5.0] Three proposals

2004-01-20 Thread Henri Gomez
Remy Maucherat a écrit : Here are some new proposals. 1) Optimization of the session implementation. The session is not a thread safe object. In Tomcat, the session implementation is partially thread safe for some reason (this has been like that since Tomcat 4.0, AFAIK). As a result, we can

Re: [5.0] Three proposals

2004-01-20 Thread Filip Hanik
I'm not sure if it should happen in TC 5.0.x or 5.1.x but I'd like to investigate in multicast magic for topology determination. If javagroups had been ASF compatible, I could have some code for that, but seems we should do it by hand or via an ASF compatible license tool. The goal is of