Gomez Henri at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, just take a look at discussion on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
about using anakia to generate doc (Re: -1 to anakia).
What about taking a look at what will be used at xml.apache.org
as documentation generator ?) Having choice is great, but there is
at
Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
Christopher Cain at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMNSHO, that kernel flag workaround is a joke. I almost fell out of my
chair with laughter when I first read that proposed solution on the
Sun forums. Hey, our JDK makes some faulty assumptions about memory
IMNSHO, that kernel flag workaround is a joke. I almost fell out of my
chair with laughter when I first read that proposed solution on the
Sun forums. Hey, our JDK makes some faulty assumptions about memory
allocation and threading ... the solution is to direct Java to use the
antiquated
Oups previous email was out too quick
IMNSHO, that kernel flag workaround is a joke. I almost fell out of my
chair with laughter when I first read that proposed solution on the
Sun forums. Hey, our JDK makes some faulty assumptions about memory
allocation and threading ... the solution is
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 12:21:55PM +0200, jean-frederic clere wrote:
I had to work around some issues with that OS myself writing the
Service
code, and definitely, I wouldn't trust that thing not even to drive
my
coffee pot, but, of course, that's me. Get a decent and real OS,
don't
fight
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I know that many of jakarta-tomcat commiters are paid by Sun but consider
that there is MANY HAPPY Linux users around which are borred of that
kind of remarks on their OS. Just recall the pool about OS used in J-T-C.
The Sun developers working
Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
Christopher Cain at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMNSHO, that kernel flag workaround is a joke. I almost fell out of my
chair with laughter when I first read that proposed solution on the
Sun forums. Hey, our JDK makes some faulty assumptions about memory
I know that many of jakarta-tomcat commiters are paid by Sun but
consider
that there is MANY HAPPY Linux users around which are borred of that
kind of remarks on their OS. Just recall the pool about OS used in
J-T-C.
The Sun developers working on Tomcat all have their own favorite
engaged in. If not for Sun, it's probably make my living slugging
through C++ ... or worse, God forbid, VB! ;-)
Here's to that! =)
- r
Christopher Cain at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMNSHO, that kernel flag workaround is a joke. I almost fell out of my
chair with laughter when I first read that proposed solution on the
Sun forums. Hey, our JDK makes some faulty assumptions about memory
allocation and threading ... the
Yup that's correct.
It does work OK with 8.0 +
Thanks for the fix - I'll put it on my site.
Adam.
Adam Fowler
Help Desk Live Project
Information Services
University of Wales, Aberystwyth
Web guy+author on the TomcatBook Project
http://tomcatbook.sourceforge.net
e-mail: [EMAIL
...
---
From: Adam Fowler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [DOC] TOC - thoughts
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 17:38:58 +
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from [64.208.42.41] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Adam Fowler wrote:
[snip]
Is this documentation going to be used on the jakarta-tomcat site? If so who
can commit the documents?
As a Tomcat developer, I believe that docs about a particular version of a
software package should be shipped with that package (*and*,
Putting little notes about things like the JDK 1.3.1 linux
issue are VERY
useful. I hate it when M$ have docs that don't mention things
such as none
of your data is encrypted, by the way
JDK 1.3.1 problems with recent glibc could be fixed by adding :
export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5
IBM JDK
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Putting little notes about things like the JDK 1.3.1 linux
issue are VERY
useful. I hate it when M$ have docs that don't mention things
such as none
of your data is encrypted, by the way
JDK 1.3.1 problems with recent glibc could be fixed by adding :
export
in advance.
Hiten Pandya (15)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Open to suggestions as always...
---
From: Adam Fowler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [DOC] TOC - thoughts
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 17:38
Until there's an ultra-quick install script, there can't be a ultra-quick
install guide. For 3.x at least, there are so many different options,
especially when you start plugging in to Apache, that I don't think it's
possible.
Hmm... Well, personally for Linux and Win2k/98/whatever, I
solution. As long as someone is willing to write such things, which in
this case I am, why not just throw it in the mix for the few people who
might benefit from it? Of course, I completely agree that there also
needs to be some short-and-sweet versions of how to do install-type
things, so
Putting little notes about things like the JDK 1.3.1 linux issue are VERY
useful. I hate it when M$ have docs that don't mention things such as none
of your data is encrypted, by the way
Not that I'm bitter 8o)
Adam.
On Wednesday 11 July 2001 14:58, you wrote:
Christopher Cain wrote:
Rob
Rob S. wrote:
There is a WHACK of info in that TOC. Your copyright is well-deserved =)
First off, I think we should have an ultra-quick install guide.
Until there's an ultra-quick install script, there can't be a ultra-quick
install guide. For 3.x at least, there are so many different
Christopher Cain wrote:
Rob S. wrote:
[snip]
First off, I think we should have an ultra-quick install guide. If you're
like a lot of geeks, you know your stuff. You need to know a quick few
steps, a quick 2-3 gotchas, and BAM that's it. I want to make sure the
quick-and-dirty
There is a WHACK of info in that TOC. Your copyright is well-deserved =)
First off, I think we should have an ultra-quick install guide. If you're
like a lot of geeks, you know your stuff. You need to know a quick few
steps, a quick 2-3 gotchas, and BAM that's it. I want to make sure the
Rob S. wrote:
[snip]
First off, I think we should have an ultra-quick install guide. If you're
like a lot of geeks, you know your stuff. You need to know a quick few
steps, a quick 2-3 gotchas, and BAM that's it. I want to make sure the
quick-and-dirty impatient install is available to
First off, I think we should have an ultra-quick install guide. If you're
like a lot of geeks, you know your stuff. You need to know a quick few
steps, a quick 2-3 gotchas, and BAM that's it. I want to make sure the
quick-and-dirty impatient install is available to the people who can
take
24 matches
Mail list logo
