Re: [PATCH] about kjc

2001-12-02 Thread Peter Donald
On Sun, 2 Dec 2001 08:03, Jon Stevens wrote: on 12/1/01 10:08 AM, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, tomcat users and developrs! /* I have post this patch twice. This is third time. */ Do you know kjc which is one of the completely opensource Java compiler? If not, you can

Re: [PATCH] about kjc

2001-12-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Takashi Okamoto wrote: Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2001 09:19:37 +0900 From: Takashi Okamoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCH] about kjc Hi, Costin

[PATCH] about kjc

2001-12-01 Thread Takashi Okamoto
Hi, tomcat users and developrs! /* I have post this patch twice. This is third time. */ Do you know kjc which is one of the completely opensource Java compiler? If not, you can see detail at http://www.dms.at/kopi. Accoding to Edouard G. Parmelan's report

Re: [PATCH] about kjc

2001-12-01 Thread costinm
Hi Takashi-san, +1 for the patch, but there's something that bothers me - we are starting to duplicate what's already present in ant. Next we'll have gcj support, etc. How difficult would it be to add an 'ant' compiler adapter, that will just use the ant javac task ? And also use the same ant

Re: [PATCH] about kjc

2001-12-01 Thread Remy Maucherat
Hi, tomcat users and developrs! /* I have post this patch twice. This is third time. */ Do you know kjc which is one of the completely opensource Java compiler? If not, you can see detail at http://www.dms.at/kopi. Accoding to Edouard G. Parmelan's report

Re: [PATCH] about kjc

2001-12-01 Thread Jon Stevens
on 12/1/01 10:08 AM, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, tomcat users and developrs! /* I have post this patch twice. This is third time. */ Do you know kjc which is one of the completely opensource Java compiler? If not, you can see detail at http://www.dms.at/kopi. Accoding

Re: [PATCH] about kjc

2001-12-01 Thread cmanolache
On Sat, 1 Dec 2001, Jon Stevens wrote: +1 for this patch as it is legal since it uses reflection. Remy I thought that using reflection to work with GPL code was still considered illegal by the FSF. As long ASF/jakarta doesn't have a list of 'accepted licences' that we can

Re: [PATCH] about kjc

2001-12-01 Thread Remy Maucherat
On Sat, 1 Dec 2001, Jon Stevens wrote: +1 for this patch as it is legal since it uses reflection. Remy I thought that using reflection to work with GPL code was still considered illegal by the FSF. As long ASF/jakarta doesn't have a list of 'accepted licences' that we can

Re: [PATCH] about kjc

2001-12-01 Thread Takashi Okamoto
Hi, Costin. At Sat, 1 Dec 2001 09:24:59 -0800 (PST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 for the patch, but there's something that bothers me - we are starting to duplicate what's already present in ant. Next we'll have gcj support, etc. How difficult would it be to add an 'ant' compiler adapter,