The test results are in. No problems have been reported with
the mod_jk 1.2.5 test release.
ballot
[ ] +1 release mod_jk 1.2.5 and I will help by building binaries for ___
[ ] +0 release mod_jk 1.2.5
[ ] -0 please don't release, reason __
[ ] -1 you can't release because of
[X] +1 release mod_jk 1.2.5 and I will help by building binaries for
Linux
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
The test results are in. No problems have been reported with
the mod_jk 1.2.5 test release.
ballot
[X] +1 release mod_jk 1.2.5 and I will help by building binaries for
Mac OS X/Solaris Sparc/FreeBSD 4.8, Apache 1.3/2.0
/ballot
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
The test results are in. No problems have been reported with
the mod_jk 1.2.5 test release.
ballot
[ ] +1 release mod_jk 1.2.5 and I will help by building binaries for
___
[X] +0 release mod_jk 1.2.5
[ ] -0 please don't release, reason __
[ ] -1 you can't
Here's my vote.
Mike Anderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/25/2003 6:59:10 AM
The test results are in. No problems have been reported with
the mod_jk 1.2.5 test release.
ballot
[ X] +1 release mod_jk 1.2.5 and I will help by building binaries for
_NetWare Apache and Enterprise Server_
[ ] +0
ballot
[ x] +1 release mod_jk 1.2.5 and I will help by building binaries for:
2.0.47/1.3.28+EAPI/IIS (WIN32)
[ ] +0 release mod_jk 1.2.5
[ ] -0 please don't release, reason __
[ ] -1 you can't release because of __
/ballot
MT.
Kurt Miller a écrit :
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The future will be mod_jk2, and I think we should focus on it after the
1.2.5 release.
Ok. I jumped in on this thread because I thought that a new problem was
introduced, but that is how it was in prior releases. I can report 1.2.5
works
Joseph Shraibman a écrit :
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
No problems have been reported since the last test source distribution
of mod_jk 1.2.5 was made available for testing July 26.
ballot
Please vote on a release of mod_jk 1.2.5:
[ ] +1 release, and I will help build binaries for _ os/web
Henri Gomez wrote:
Joseph Shraibman a écrit :
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
No problems have been reported since the last test source distribution
of mod_jk 1.2.5 was made available for testing July 26.
ballot
Please vote on a release of mod_jk 1.2.5:
[ ] +1 release, and I will help build binaries for
From: Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Henri Gomez wrote:
Joseph Shraibman a écrit :
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
No problems have been reported since the last test source distribution
of mod_jk 1.2.5 was made available for testing July 26.
ballot
Please vote on a release of mod_jk
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
No problems have been reported since the last test source distribution
of mod_jk 1.2.5 was made available for testing July 26.
ballot
Please vote on a release of mod_jk 1.2.5:
[ ] +1 release, and I will help build binaries for _ os/web server
[ ] +0 ok to release
[ ]
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The future will be mod_jk2, and I think we should focus on it after the
1.2.5 release.
Ok. I jumped in on this thread because I thought that a new problem was
introduced, but that is how it was in prior releases. I can report 1.2.5
works fine on
No problems have been reported since the last test source distribution
of mod_jk 1.2.5 was made available for testing July 26.
ballot
Please vote on a release of mod_jk 1.2.5:
[ ] +1 release, and I will help build binaries for _ os/web server
[ ] +0 ok to release
[ ] -0 release, but I
Glenn Nielsen a écrit :
No problems have been reported since the last test source distribution
of mod_jk 1.2.5 was made available for testing July 26.
ballot
Please vote on a release of mod_jk 1.2.5:
[X] +1 release, and I will help build binaries for _ os/web server
[ ] +0 ok to release
[
Henri Gomez a écrit :
Glenn Nielsen a écrit :
No problems have been reported since the last test source distribution
of mod_jk 1.2.5 was made available for testing July 26.
ballot
Please vote on a release of mod_jk 1.2.5:
[X] +1 release, and I will help build binaries for _ os/web
From: Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 6:39 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Release mod_jk 1.2.5
No problems have been reported since the last test source distribution
of mod_jk 1.2.5 was made available for testing July 26.
I've found one problem
Kurt Miller a écrit :
From: Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 6:39 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Release mod_jk 1.2.5
No problems have been reported since the last test source distribution
of mod_jk 1.2.5 was made available for testing July 26.
I've
with the APR code.
Regards,
Glenn
Kurt Miller wrote:
From: Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 6:39 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Release mod_jk 1.2.5
No problems have been reported since the last test source distribution
of mod_jk 1.2.5 was made available for testing
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It was u_long before I change it in in_addr_t and then change
it back to u_long.
Oh. I guess I should have done a bit more research.;-) I just started
attempting to get mod_jk going on sparc64 a few days ago. However, using a
u_long for laddr is the cause of
Kurt Miller a écrit :
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It was u_long before I change it in in_addr_t and then change
it back to u_long.
Oh. I guess I should have done a bit more research.;-) I just started
attempting to get mod_jk going on sparc64 a few days ago. However, using a
u_long for
Kurt Miller wrote:
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It was u_long before I change it in in_addr_t and then change
it back to u_long.
Oh. I guess I should have done a bit more research.;-) I just started
attempting to get mod_jk going on sparc64 a few days ago. However, using a
u_long for
Kurt Miller a écrit :
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kurt Miller a écrit :
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It was u_long before I change it in in_addr_t and then change
it back to u_long.
Oh. I guess I should have done a bit more research.;-) I just started
attempting to get mod_jk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/1/2003 4:39:27 AM
No problems have been reported since the last test source
distribution
of mod_jk 1.2.5 was made available for testing July 26.
ballot
Please vote on a release of mod_jk 1.2.5:
[ X] +1 release, and I will help build binaries for NetWare Apache
Henri Gomez said:
The correct behaviour will be to use in_addr_t, but it don't works on
iSeries (even if it's defined, I couldn't find the correct include).
To fix the problem we could use a #define BSD64 ? to make use of
in_addr_t until we make more works ?
Just provide the correct
24 matches
Mail list logo
