Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 11/10/02 3:14, Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 2002/10/10 6:50 PM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can tell you that our main Java instance for VNUNET.COM takes
approximately 4 to 5 minutes to start...
OUCH.
Our main web-app has
Costin Manolache wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- starting a VM using exec / monitor the child process. It is not
implemented yet in jk2 - but pretty important ( it's one of the features
from jserv that wasn't yet ported). It seems daemon has a bit
Henri Gomez wrote:
What do you plan to use to do the real-time monitoring ?
Threads embedded in Apache 2.0 or will Apache 2.0
execing daemon/service monitors which in turn launch
and monitor the JVM ?
The solution must work for apache1.3 and other single-threaded
and multiprocess servers.
Costin Manolache wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
I wonder if a release of commons-daemon is planned.
No, because promoting it to commons proper got vetoed.
At the moment, it looks like a split between daemon and launcher will
happen.
For the record - nobody can 'veto'
Costin Manolache wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
As I said, for 'chuid' functionality I prefer using a direct
call - I have most of it implemented using jk2, I'll
finish this well before 5.0 is released.
I prefer to have a C wrapper that start the JVM and call methods than
having the
As I mentioned, there's a lot of duplication - and likely we'll
see more. I don't see this as a major problem - duplication is
sometimes good. It would be however nice to have similar
behavior when possible and make sure we pick each other's
fixes.
The areas of duplication:
- starting and
Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- starting a VM using exec / monitor the child process. It is not
implemented yet in jk2 - but pretty important ( it's one of the features
from jserv that wasn't yet ported). It seems daemon has a bit
of code - as I mentioned from reading it I don't
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- starting a VM using exec / monitor the child process. It is not
implemented yet in jk2 - but pretty important ( it's one of the features
from jserv that wasn't yet ported). It seems daemon has a bit
of code - as I mentioned
On 10/10/02 20:21, Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 'feature' is that all tomcat processes ( and you may run more than
one in a load balanced mode ) can be started automatically and monitored.
If one dies, it'll be automatically restarted.
tip
http://cr.yp.to/daemontools.html
on 2002/10/10 6:50 PM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can tell you that our main Java instance for VNUNET.COM takes
approximately 4 to 5 minutes to start...
OUCH.
-jon
--
StudioZ.tv /\ Bar/Nightclub/Entertainment
314 11th Street @ Folsom /\ San Francisco
On 11/10/02 3:14, Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 2002/10/10 6:50 PM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can tell you that our main Java instance for VNUNET.COM takes
approximately 4 to 5 minutes to start...
OUCH.
Our main web-app has roughly 400 JSP pages to
Quoting Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Our main web-app has roughly 400 JSP pages to compile (you never know), 20
servlets loaded on startup, 4 lucene indexes to open, 500 connections to the
database, 350/400 megabytes of cached objects to de-serialize and put down
into memory, and some
I wonder if a release of commons-daemon is planned.
JF ?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Henri Gomez wrote:
I wonder if a release of commons-daemon is planned.
No, because promoting it to commons proper got vetoed.
At the moment, it looks like a split between daemon and launcher will
happen.
(like Costin, I'd really like to get rid of the Java code in daemon -
the o.a.c.daemon
Henri Gomez wrote:
I wonder if a release of commons-daemon is planned.
JF ?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using it in a product named openIS.
The FSC QA are still complaining about small
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
I wonder if a release of commons-daemon is planned.
No, because promoting it to commons proper got vetoed.
And the reasons why have not been changed... I had no time to write the needed
code (and I was on holidays at the time of the veto: it was
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
I wonder if a release of commons-daemon is planned.
No, because promoting it to commons proper got vetoed.
At the moment, it looks like a split between daemon and launcher will
happen.
For the record - nobody can 'veto' a promotion to commons
or
17 matches
Mail list logo
