mturk 2002/10/02 23:58:24
Modified:jk/xdocs/jk2 configweb.xml
Log:
Add the channel.apr and explain new options for the
load balancer.
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +87 -3 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xdocs/jk2/configweb.xml
Index: configweb.xml
Mladen Turk wrote:
There has been some major fixes inside the uriMap, uriEnv, apr_socket
and lb that makes the 2_0_0 IMO unusable, and personally I'm ashamed as
a RM that this was a release after all :(.
Do not!
That is a lot of work to make a release and all of us will benefit to the fact
Costin Manolache wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
On Behalf Of Costin Manolache
Are we documenting all those settings - and the details on
why/how :-) ?
Sure, like everyone else ;).
Yes, I know :-)
I'll try to get over the horrible and nonstandard DTD that we
Han Ming Ong wrote:
Folks,
I'm trying to trace down a TCP_NODELAY problem and wanted to see if
it exists on the latest connector mod_jk2. So I configured Apache
2.0.42, Tomcat 4.1.12 and downloaded
jakarta-tomcat-connectors-4.1.12-src. I managed to use GNU's libtoolize
to configure
Matt Fury wrote:
I BELIEVE that is due to some incorrect commenting in
your server.xml file. I had this problem once and I
thats what caused it.
Double check your server.xml file.
I triple checked ALL xml files, and they are correct
and the error show up first in digester.
I suspect
Costin Manolache wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
More comments on APR and JK2.
While making tomcat-connectors rpm for jk2, and also
jk2 binaries for Linux, I wanted to have apache 1.3 jk2
built with JNI support.
Do you have a multithreaded apache1.3 ? It's very important
to compile it as
Mladen Turk wrote:
There has been some major fixes inside the uriMap, uriEnv, apr_socket
and lb that makes the 2_0_0 IMO unusable, and personally I'm ashamed as
a RM that this was a release after all :(.
Since we tagged and released JK2 as beta, seems to me that we could
easily do the same
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8107.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Ashley Huang Wanyi wrote:
Hello,
Can you email me this file isapi_redirect.dll , as i couldn't find it.
Thank You.
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/bin/win32/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Something which should done will be to tag in C sources
for use by scandoc (or doxygen).
I'll try to do this for jk/native.
Comments ?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Henri Gomez wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
More comments on APR and JK2.
While making tomcat-connectors rpm for jk2, and also
jk2 binaries for Linux, I wanted to have apache 1.3 jk2
built with JNI support.
Do you have a multithreaded apache1.3 ? It's very
Henri Gomez wrote:
Something which should done will be to tag in C sources
for use by scandoc (or doxygen).
I'll try to do this for jk/native.
Comments ?
That is some work... The scandoc templates were prepared for mod_webapp.
doxygen is what is most communily used in Apache.
--
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13240.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13033.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10683.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13223.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Kevin Jones wrote:
Not a vote, just wondered when we can expect to see the milestone builds
appearing?
I would say sometimes next week for 5.0.0 if everyone is ok with that.
Keep in mind this is not feature complete yet.
Remy
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
mturk 2002/10/03 03:52:16
Modified:jk/xdocs/jk2 configweb.xml
Log:
Add the explanation about uri:*:port scheme.
Revision ChangesPath
1.11 +8 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xdocs/jk2/configweb.xml
Index: configweb.xml
Thanks Remy,
Kevin Jones
Developmentor
www.develop.com
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 October 2002 11:22
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] [5.0] Milestones
Kevin Jones wrote:
Not a vote, just wondered when we can
Thank-you, but I still seem to get errors.
Namely the logkit from Avalon is referencing an old verion. I fixed it up
to the following
logkit.home=${base.path}/LogKit-1.1
logkit.lib=${logkit.home}
logkit.jar=${logkit.lib}/logkit-1.1.jar
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13241.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I propose that we split the:
1. configtc.xml to the 2 documents:
a. configtc.xml
b. configtcex.xml (having the examples section)
2. configweb.xml to the 3 (or perhaps more) documents:
a. configweb.xml (having intro and config section)
b. configwebcom.xml
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12978.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13241.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13241.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13241.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2002/10/03 05:56:39
Modified:.build.properties.default
Log:
- New Xerces version.
Revision ChangesPath
1.38 +3 -3 jakarta-tomcat-5/build.properties.default
Index: build.properties.default
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13241.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13241.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13164.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13173.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13241.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
On Behalf Of Costin Manolache
Are we documenting all those settings - and the details on
why/how :-) ?
Sure, like everyone else ;).
Yes, I know :-)
I'll try to get over the
Actually, with the recent release of commons-logging, we should be able to get
rid of the explicit LogKit and Log4J. They're there so as to get a complete
build of commons-logging. Tomcat 5 itself doesn't use either directly.
Xerces is a different issue. There was a bug that was preventing
mturk 2002/10/03 08:32:51
Modified:jk/xdocs menu.jk2.idx
Log:
Split the jk2 menu.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +12 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xdocs/menu.jk2.idx
Index: menu.jk2.idx
===
mturk 2002/10/03 08:33:41
Added: jk/xdocs/jk2 configwebex.xml configwebcom.xml configtcex.xml
Log:
Add new splitted documents
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xdocs/jk2/configwebex.xml
Index: configwebex.xml
mturk 2002/10/03 08:34:10
Modified:jk/xdocs/jk2 configweb.xml configtc.xml
Log:
Add new splitted documents
Revision ChangesPath
1.12 +1 -592jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xdocs/jk2/configweb.xml
Index: configweb.xml
hi,
I got little problem with Tomcat 4.0.5 (I don't know if this version is still in
develoment) it appears in taglibs, specially in bodycontentJSP/bodycontent and i
think it's bug.. before i report i'm asking you is it (I hope i'm wrong this time)
It goes like this:
i have this kind of
Steve Downey wrote:
Actually, with the recent release of commons-logging, we should be able to get
rid of the explicit LogKit and Log4J. They're there so as to get a complete
build of commons-logging. Tomcat 5 itself doesn't use either directly.
Xerces is a different issue. There was a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13081.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13132.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Costin Manolache wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
On Behalf Of Costin Manolache
Are we documenting all those settings - and the details on
why/how :-) ?
Sure, like everyone else ;).
Yes, I know :-)
I'll try to
luehe 2002/10/03 09:50:05
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime
JspContextWrapper.java
Log:
Changed class comment
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +9 -5
This causes all 181 Watchdog JSP tests to fail.
I don't know why yet, and it's probably something simple, but it's not a good
sign.
On Thursday 03 October 2002 08:56 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
remm2002/10/03 05:56:39
Modified:.build.properties.default
Log:
-
costin 2002/10/03 09:57:49
Modified:jk/xdocs index.xml
jk/xdocs/jk2 configwebcom.xml
Log:
Added the 'version' common property.
Few addition and fixes in the description of jk2.
Revision ChangesPath
1.11 +23 -7
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12694.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13253.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12870.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Henri Gomez wrote:
Steve Downey wrote:
Actually, with the recent release of commons-logging, we should be
able to get rid of the explicit LogKit and Log4J. They're there so as
to get a complete build of commons-logging. Tomcat 5 itself doesn't
use either directly.
Xerces is a
costin 2002/10/03 10:20:52
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4
CoyoteInputStream.java
coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5
CoyoteInputStream.java
Log:
Added available().
PR: 12870
Revision
Hi all,
Before starting to release 5.0.x milestones, I would like to propose
having only one distribution for Tomcat 5.0.x, and standardize on what
the LE distribution contains (so well, it's more the other distribution
which gets removed).
It has some advantages:
- it is slightly smaller
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13253.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Han Ming Ong wrote:
I added a super simple workers2.properties file in the same dir and
tried to start apache. I got a seg fault. Here's the stacktrace from
Mac OS X default crash logger:
Command:httpd
PID:853
Exception: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (0x0001)
Codes:
Jean-Francois Arcand wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Steve Downey wrote:
Actually, with the recent release of commons-logging, we should be
able to get rid of the explicit LogKit and Log4J. They're there so as
to get a complete build of commons-logging. Tomcat 5 itself doesn't
use
On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 13:24, Remy Maucherat wrote:
ballot
+1 [X] Yes, remove the LE distribution
-1 [ ] No, keep both distributions
/ballot
simpler is better.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
+0 (Ok but can't help right now)
Could you check:
http://jakarta.apache.org/~mturk/docs/
Looks good. Can you check in ?
Henri: would you mind if we remove the reference to ajp14 ?
I thought
jean-frederic clere wrote:
:-) Sorry about 'horrible'.
What I meant is - the elements like section and almost everything
else have an identical meaning as the standard XHTML or docbook element.
It's a mix of elements - to do something that is already done and
standard and accepted.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi all,
Before starting to release 5.0.x milestones, I would like to propose
having only one distribution for Tomcat 5.0.x, and standardize on what
the LE distribution contains (so well, it's more the other distribution
which gets removed).
It has some advantages:
On Thursday 03 October 2002 12:14 pm, Henri Gomez wrote:
Steve Downey wrote:
Actually, with the recent release of commons-logging, we should be able
to get rid of the explicit LogKit and Log4J. They're there so as to get a
complete build of commons-logging. Tomcat 5 itself doesn't use
Oops! sorry, I missed my vote.
ballot
+1 [X] Yes, remove the LE distribution
-1 [ ] No, keep both distributions
/ballot
-Original Message-
From: iasandcb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 3:06 AM
To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
Subject: RE: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13223.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13223.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13254.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13254.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
iasandcb wrote:
First all, I vote
ballot
+1 [ ] Yes, remove the LE distribution
-1 [ ] No, keep both distributions
/ballot
Next, I'd like to make this clear: Tomcat 5 is based on JSP 2.0 spec,
which requires J2SE 1.4. Therefore Tomcat 5 also can't run without J2SE
1.4 ideally. However,
On Thursday, October 3, 2002, at 09:14 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Steve Downey wrote:
Actually, with the recent release of commons-logging, we should be
able to get rid of the explicit LogKit and Log4J. They're there so as
to get a complete build of commons-logging. Tomcat 5 itself doesn't
kinman 2002/10/03 12:25:19
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Tag:
tomcat_4_branch Generator.java
Log:
- Fix 13144: Ending comment eats up line following.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No
costin 2002/10/03 12:31:31
Modified:jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkMain.java
Log:
If only Ajp connector is used, nobody will initialize the https: handler
and redirects for https sites will fail ( a URL constructor is used somewhere ).
PR: 11657
Submitted by: [EMAIL
kinman 2002/10/03 12:29:38
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java
Log:
- Fix 13144.
Revision ChangesPath
1.105 +4 -3
jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler/Generator.java
Index: Generator.java
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Costin Manolache wrote:
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:30:47 -0700
From: Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution
iasandcb wrote:
First all, I
costin 2002/10/03 12:34:47
Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/mx DynamicMBeanProxy.java
Log:
A fix in the object name ( ',' needs to be used as separator ).
Also added unregister - need for reloads.
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +19 -5
ballot
+1 [X] Yes, remove the LE distribution
-1 [ ] No, keep both distributions
/ballot
But...The only problem I see is the Xerces version included in 1.3
doesn't support XML Schema. So if people turn on validation, the parser
will not work for Servlet 2.4/JSP 2.0I recommend we make it
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13144.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10267.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13144.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
- Original Message -
From: Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:30 AM
Subject: RE: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution
iasandcb wrote:
First all, I vote
ballot
+1 [ ] Yes, remove the LE distribution
-1 [ ] No,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13258.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13004.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13144.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I doesnt have any problems with redirs with Coyote/jk2 using https in
IIS, AFAIK the only use URL class had, was to try to get a absolute RUL
or something like that, with a Method Craig did many time ago this
should be unnecssary...
I wonder how do you did the tests?
Saludos ,
Ignacio J.
On Thursday 03 October 2002 12:14 pm, Henri Gomez wrote:
Steve Downey wrote:
Actually, with the recent release of commons-logging, we should be able
to get rid of the explicit LogKit and Log4J. They're there so as to get a
complete build of commons-logging. Tomcat 5 itself doesn't use
- Original Message -
From: Ignacio J. Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:36 PM
Subject: RE: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkMain.java
I doesnt have any problems with redirs
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13223.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
De: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: 3 de octubre de 2002 22:52
It seems that o.a.c.tomcat4/5.CoyoteResponse is using
java.net.URL instead
of Craig's o.a.c.u.URL or (the same class for 3.3)
o.a.t.u.net.URL. AFAIK,
changing the import statement in CoyoteResponse
Hi. I have been looking into a problem with Tomcat5, ClientAuth=false,
and JSSE in JDK1.4 and it seems like the JSSE has a problem.
Namely if you build an SSL socket, then later decide you need to
exchange certs with the client (ie. CLIENT-CERT), then the
SSlSocket.startHandshake()
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13263.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13264.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Bill Barker wrote:
I doesnt have any problems with redirs with Coyote/jk2 using https in
IIS, AFAIK the only use URL class had, was to try to get a absolute RUL
or something like that, with a Method Craig did many time ago this
should be unnecssary...
I wonder how do you did the tests?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13264.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Dear Sir,
I like to use DBCP to connect to Oracle JDBC driver.
Would you please show me how to download the DBCP API jar file? So I can put
it into
$CATALINA_HOME/common/lib
DBCP uses the Jakarta-Commons Database Connection Pool. It relies on number
of Jakarta-Commons componenets:
On Thursday, October 3, 2002, at 10:28 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
Command:httpd
PID:853
Exception: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (0x0001)
Codes: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS (0x0001) at 0x736f0028
Thread 0 Crashed:
#0 0x90001600 in strlen
#1 0x900023e0 in vfprintf
#2
Look here,
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-commons/release/commons-dbcp/v1.0/
On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 17:44, Shih, John wrote:
Dear Sir,
I like to use DBCP to connect to Oracle JDBC driver.
Would you please show me how to download the DBCP API jar file? So I can put
it into
NEW FILE (in jakarta-servletapi-5.newfiles.tar):
- jsr154/src/share/dtd/j2ee_web_services_1_1.xsd
(Required by latest j2ee_1_4.xsd)
CHANGED FILES:
jsr152/src/share/javax/servlet/jsp/JspContext.java:
- getAttribute(name): Remove IllegalArgumentException
for non-existent
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12346.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
De: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Costin Manolache
Enviado el: 3 de octubre de 2002 23:40
Ok.. this should be fixed too, but i doenst understand why
it works for
me using Coyote/JK2.. because i have the JSSE jars on my
ext dir simply?
Are you using JDK1.4 ( in jdk1.4
- Original Message -
From: Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 2:37 PM
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkMain.java
Bill Barker wrote:
I doesnt have any problems with redirs with
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13223.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
kinman 2002/10/03 16:01:44
Modified:jsr152/src/share/dtd web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd
jsr152/src/share/javax/servlet/jsp JspContext.java
PageContext.java
jsr152/src/share/javax/servlet/jsp/el ELException.java
luehe 2002/10/03 16:50:11
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java
jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime
BodyContentImpl.java JspContextWrapper.java
PageContextImpl.java
Log:
Fixed
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12558.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
