Re: Rejecting connections: empty http header if maxProcessors reached

2003-12-27 Thread Remy Maucherat
Bernd Bartke wrote: I sent posted this message into the tomcat-user list two days ago, but got no respond so far - so maybe it's a question to the developers :-) Hi, what is the desired behaviour if tomcat 4.1.29 rejects incoming requests because of maxProcessors reached? Should tomcat return

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10040] - SingleSignOn valve unbounded memory use

2003-12-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10040. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9077] - SingleSignOn and session invalidate

2003-12-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9077. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25774] New: - Documentation change needed for making unix daemon

2003-12-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25774. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-5 tomcat.nsi

2003-12-27 Thread remm
remm2003/12/27 09:32:23 Modified:.tomcat.nsi Log: - Add some metadata to the .exe. Revision ChangesPath 1.40 +14 -3 jakarta-tomcat-5/tomcat.nsi Index: tomcat.nsi === RCS file:

[PATCH - Proposed] Bug 10526

2003-12-27 Thread Mark Thomas
All, Looking at bug 10526 (http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10526) the patch below is proposed as the fix. Is there any reason not to apply it? I had a look at the spec for both sessions and authentication and couldn't see anything that would prevent it. Thanks in advance for

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10330] - Unable to compile JSPs in XML syntax on Linux 7.2

2003-12-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10330. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardContext.java

2003-12-27 Thread markt
markt 2003/12/27 12:37:58 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardContext.java Log: - Fix bug 10656. If session-timeout is zero or less, session should not timeout. - Ported from TC5 patch by luehe. Revision ChangesPath

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10656] - Session Timeout incorrect for 0 in web.xml

2003-12-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10656. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [PATCH - Proposed] Bug 10526

2003-12-27 Thread Remy Maucherat
Mark Thomas wrote: All, Looking at bug 10526 (http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10526) the patch below is proposed as the fix. Is there any reason not to apply it? I had a look at the spec for both sessions and authentication and couldn't see anything that would prevent it.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10909] - Problem calling anonymous classes in servlet destroy() method

2003-12-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10909. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10972] - Realm without className in server.xml produces NullPointerException

2003-12-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10972. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [PATCH - Proposed] Bug 10526

2003-12-27 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2003 12:45 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH - Proposed] Bug 10526 Mark Thomas wrote: All, Looking at bug 10526