Bernd Bartke wrote:
I sent posted this message into the tomcat-user list two days ago, but
got no respond so far - so maybe it's a question to the developers :-)
Hi,
what is the desired behaviour if tomcat 4.1.29 rejects incoming requests
because of maxProcessors reached?
Should tomcat return
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10040.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9077.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25774.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2003/12/27 09:32:23
Modified:.tomcat.nsi
Log:
- Add some metadata to the .exe.
Revision ChangesPath
1.40 +14 -3 jakarta-tomcat-5/tomcat.nsi
Index: tomcat.nsi
===
RCS file:
All,
Looking at bug 10526 (http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10526)
the patch below is proposed as the fix. Is there any reason not to apply it? I
had a look at the spec for both sessions and authentication and couldn't see
anything that would prevent it.
Thanks in advance for
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10330.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
markt 2003/12/27 12:37:58
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
StandardContext.java
Log:
- Fix bug 10656. If session-timeout is zero or less, session should not timeout.
- Ported from TC5 patch by luehe.
Revision ChangesPath
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10656.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
Looking at bug 10526 (http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10526)
the patch below is proposed as the fix. Is there any reason not to apply it? I
had a look at the spec for both sessions and authentication and couldn't see
anything that would prevent it.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10909.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10972.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2003 12:45 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH - Proposed] Bug 10526
Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
Looking at bug 10526
13 matches
Mail list logo