Dear Customer,
Thank you for your interest in the services offered by TimesofMoney.com.We have
received your email. Our Customer Relations Officer will get in touch with you
shortly. In case you would like to speak to our representatives, you can reach
us at these numbers : 2207 2072
mturk 2004/11/09 00:17:03
Modified:jk/native/common jk_global.h
Log:
Add missing includes for Netware.
Revision ChangesPath
1.36 +3 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_global.h
Index: jk_global.h
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29521.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
NormW wrote:
Missed a patch perhaps?
A build on Apache 2.1 shows symbols F_GETFL, F_SETFL as undefined and a
text search through the JTC source tree finds the only references in
jk_connect.c
Norm
Seems that we are missing header on Netware.
IMO the F_GETFL/F_SETFL are defined inside nks/fsio.h,
Dear Customer,
Thank you for your interest in the services offered by TimesofMoney.com.We have
received your email. Our Customer Relations Officer will get in touch with you
shortly. In case you would like to speak to our representatives, you can reach
us at these numbers : 2207 2072
Dear Customer,
Thank you for your interest in the services offered by TimesofMoney.com.We have
received your email. Our Customer Relations Officer will get in touch with you
shortly. In case you would like to speak to our representatives, you can reach
us at these numbers : 2207 2072
Hi Mladen,
great! I don't know how hard the following is to achieve, but it is the
most prominent problem around mod_jk-Logging I know of:
mod_jk does neither support Apaches rotatelogs nor does it have a log
rotation capability on its own. If you or any other committer has an
idea how to
Dear Customer,
Thank you for your interest in the services offered by TimesofMoney.com.We have
received your email. Our Customer Relations Officer will get in touch with you
shortly. In case you would like to speak to our representatives, you can reach
us at these numbers : 2207 2072
Mladen Turk wrote:
NormW wrote:
Missed a patch perhaps?
A build on Apache 2.1 shows symbols F_GETFL, F_SETFL as undefined and
a text search through the JTC source tree finds the only references in
jk_connect.c
Norm
Seems that we are missing header on Netware.
IMO the F_GETFL/F_SETFL are defined
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
Tomcat 5.5.4 has been available for about a week now, and tentatively
rated alpha for this time. Now that people have hopefully had some time
to test it out, let's vote on its stability.
The release passes all our internal tests, and also passes the Servlet
and JSP TCKs.
mturk 2004/11/09 04:17:44
Modified:jk/native/apache-1.3 mod_jk.c
jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c
jk/native/common jk_map.c jk_map.h jk_uri_worker_map.c
jk_util.c jk_worker.c
jk/native/domino jk_dsapi_plugin.c
NormW wrote:
# Undefined symbol: 'jk_map_free'
A text search of the jtc source tree fails ...
Yep, sorry, mea culpa.
I have broken the build reverting Jean-Frederic's latest patches
map_free - jk_map_free.
I have extended it's idea and prefixed all map_xxx function with
jk namespace.
Regards,
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ X ] Stable
A non-binding vote. I've done a bit of testing and haven't had any issues.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, I get it, but many of us use it. Any chance we'll get a dll more
recent than March 26th?
Thanks,
Derrick
-Original Message-
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 10:50 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: FW: Building
Hi,
I'm also changing my vote to
[ X ] Stable
now that I've had more of a chance to test it over the weekend, including
running some home-grown apps and their respective stress tests.
(BTW Peter if you're watching this thread, the JMeter monitor thing works
great!)
Let's run this vote for
haha, glad it helped. I find myself using it quite a bit when I'm
working on my own stuff on tomcat. it's a nice quick way to make sure
the memory usage follows a regular pattern. It it doesn't I start up
OptimizeIt :)
peter
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 08:46:25 -0500, Shapira, Yoav [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32130.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32130.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32130.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32135.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Ich werde ab 10.11.2004 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am
15.11.2004.
Ich werde Ihre Nachricht nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten.
In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an meinen Kollegen Rolf-Dieter
Gross: Tel.: 02056 / 12-5440
oder erreichen mich unter
Mobil: 0172 745 81 45
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32137.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32135.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
NormW wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
NormW wrote:
Missed a patch perhaps?
A build on Apache 2.1 shows symbols F_GETFL, F_SETFL as undefined and
a text search through the JTC source tree finds the only references
in jk_connect.c
Norm
Seems that we are missing header on Netware.
IMO the
I have been experimenting with embedding Tomcat except embedding the
full normal distribution via Bootstrap rather than fiddling with the
embedded distribution. A few questions arise from this:
1. When using multiple Tomcats, e.g. with CATALINA_BASE, etc, does
one always need separate
For cases where the session data is too large and/or volatile to
replicate without a performance penalty and where session affinity is
thus required, is there any hope/possibility/interest of trying to
balance the number of active sessions per Tomcat instance (i.e. sending
new requests to the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32141.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi All!
Can any one help me abt clustering and Loadbalancing using Tomcat 5.0/later.
We have an application, Which is run on Tomcat 4.0.
Now we are going to run this application in Tomcat 5.0.
Also we are going to implements the clustering technology to our appl.
So that i need som help, How
Vinayagam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi All!
Can any one help me abt clustering and Loadbalancing using Tomcat 5.0/later.
We have an application, Which is run on Tomcat 4.0.
Now we are going to run this application in Tomcat 5.0.
Also we are going to implements the clustering technology to our
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:me diz o queacha?
ATTACHMENT part 2 application/x-zip-compressed name=:(.zip
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
13823139100
Hi!,
I didn't get understand this language. Can u pls send it as English!
Regards
Vinayagam
- Original Message -
From: aly chin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: Clustering and Load balancing
On Nov 9, 2004, at 10:00 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
is there any hope/possibility/interest of trying to balance the number
of active sessions per Tomcat instance (i.e. sending new requests to
the instance with the fewest active sessions)?
We (UF, I cannot claim to represent the tomcat devs) are happy
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
So following the usual criteria, Tomcat 5.5.4 is:
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
Sorry for the delay.
I just got a new computer, so needed to set everything up and
running.
MT.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
33 matches
Mail list logo
