Was there a reason mod_jk2 was replaced with mod_jk? I found mod_jk2
much easier to use and it's a pity it's gone. Is it just looking for a
maintainer?
Were there advantages of mod_jk2 over mod_jk?
Alistair
-
To unsubscribe,
ok, that's enlightening!
many thanks,
Alistair
On 17 Mar 2005, at 10:13, Mladen Turk wrote:
Alistair Young wrote:
Was there a reason mod_jk2 was replaced with mod_jk?
Too complex, uses APR that behaves badly with Apache1.3,
and lot more. Browse the mail archive for further details.
I found mod_jk2
