Re: Ready for mod_jk 1.2.6 release?

2004-07-09 Thread Günter Knauf
Hi, I have 2 unresolved: snprintf and vsnprintf. With Apache-2.0 we should use apr_snprintf and apr_vsnprintf for Apache-1.3 should I add ersatz routines? yes; on NetWare we have also with Apache 1.3 another system lib which lacks support of those two; so would be cool if we could add

Re: Ready for mod_jk 1.2.6 release?

2004-07-09 Thread jean-frederic clere
Günter Knauf wrote: Hi, I have 2 unresolved: snprintf and vsnprintf. With Apache-2.0 we should use apr_snprintf and apr_vsnprintf for Apache-1.3 should I add ersatz routines? yes; on NetWare we have also with Apache 1.3 another system lib which lacks support of those two; so would be cool if we

Re: Ready for mod_jk 1.2.6 release?

2004-07-09 Thread Günter Knauf
Hi, Sure see in apr/build/jlibtool.c ;-) But we need a little in the configure to check for snprintf and vsnprintf. why? just make it mandatory for 1.3, this avoids all the hassle, plus has the benefit that we have a implementation we can trust; f.e. what if config detects the functions in the

Re: Ready for mod_jk 1.2.6 release?

2004-07-08 Thread Henri Gomez
Rainer Jung wrote: Hi, the last release of mod_jk 1.2.x (1.2.5) is more than 9 months old. Since then there have been important improvements (CPing/CPong and recovery_options). Especially recovery_options is very useful in transparent administration (start/stop) of cluster nodes. The 1.2

Re: Ready for mod_jk 1.2.6 release?

2004-07-08 Thread Henri Gomez
Service Client Fnac.com wrote: Chère Cliente, Cher Client, Merci de nous avoir contactés. Vous venez d'envoyer un message à une adresse ne permettant pas de recevoir d'e-mail. Pour trouver les réponses à vos questions sur vos commandes, sur les produits, sur le site, consultez nos pages d'aide en

Re: Re: Ready for mod_jk 1.2.6 release?

2004-07-08 Thread Service Client Fnac.com
Chère Cliente, Cher Client, Merci de nous avoir contactés. Vous venez d'envoyer un message à une adresse ne permettant pas de recevoir d'e-mail. Pour trouver les réponses à vos questions sur vos commandes, sur les produits, sur le site, consultez nos pages d'aide en ligne en cliquant sur :

AW: Ready for mod_jk 1.2.6 release?

2004-07-08 Thread Hans Schmid
Betreff: Re: Ready for mod_jk 1.2.6 release? Rainer Jung wrote: Hi, the last release of mod_jk 1.2.x (1.2.5) is more than 9 months old. Since then there have been important improvements (CPing/CPong and recovery_options). Especially recovery_options is very useful in transparent

Re: Ready for mod_jk 1.2.6 release?

2004-07-08 Thread Remy Maucherat
Henri Gomez wrote: Well I don't see why the Client Support of Fnac is subscribed here, so I strongly suggest mailing list manager to remove it. I'm on a modem this week :/ Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

Re: Ready for mod_jk 1.2.6 release?

2004-07-08 Thread Henri Gomez
Henri Gomez wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Hi, the last release of mod_jk 1.2.x (1.2.5) is more than 9 months old. Since then there have been important improvements (CPing/CPong and recovery_options). Especially recovery_options is very useful in transparent administration (start/stop) of cluster

Re: Ready for mod_jk 1.2.6 release?

2004-07-08 Thread jean-frederic clere
Henri Gomez wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Hi, the last release of mod_jk 1.2.x (1.2.5) is more than 9 months old. Since then there have been important improvements (CPing/CPong and recovery_options). Especially recovery_options is very useful in transparent administration (start/stop) of cluster

Re: Ready for mod_jk 1.2.6 release?

2004-07-08 Thread Jess Holle
Ditto. I started just using CVS-latest for mod_jk and mod_jk2 some time back as the gap between new, stable feature/fix content and release labels was just too great. Overall CVS-latest has been more stable than the last labels for some time now David Rees wrote: Rainer Jung wrote:

Re: Ready for mod_jk 1.2.6 release?

2004-07-08 Thread jean-frederic clere
jean-frederic clere wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Hi, the last release of mod_jk 1.2.x (1.2.5) is more than 9 months old. Since then there have been important improvements (CPing/CPong and recovery_options). Especially recovery_options is very useful in transparent administration

Ready for mod_jk 1.2.6 release?

2004-07-07 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi, the last release of mod_jk 1.2.x (1.2.5) is more than 9 months old. Since then there have been important improvements (CPing/CPong and recovery_options). Especially recovery_options is very useful in transparent administration (start/stop) of cluster nodes. The 1.2 branch is still the

Re: Ready for mod_jk 1.2.6 release?

2004-07-07 Thread Günter Knauf
the last release of mod_jk 1.2.x (1.2.5) is more than 9 months old. +1 for releasing as son as possible; we missed already the last service pack on NetWare and had to ship cvs code... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: Ready for mod_jk 1.2.6 release?

2004-07-07 Thread Peter Rossbach
+1 important features to help customers to have a stable loadbalancer... At Linux Suse 9.0 it works fine. regards Peter Rainer Jung schrieb: Hi, the last release of mod_jk 1.2.x (1.2.5) is more than 9 months old. Since then there have been important improvements (CPing/CPong and

Re: Ready for mod_jk 1.2.6 release?

2004-07-07 Thread David Rees
Rainer Jung wrote: the last release of mod_jk 1.2.x (1.2.5) is more than 9 months old. Since then there have been important improvements (CPing/CPong and recovery_options). Especially recovery_options is very useful in transparent administration (start/stop) of cluster nodes. I would like to