RE: creating web applications

2004-05-29 Thread swapna gupta
THANKS for directing me to the link. But my problem doesnt get solved by the solution provided, i.e. i.e. Uncomment the following in your Tomcat's web.xml file. !-- The mapping for the invoker servlet -- servlet-mapping servlet-nameinvoker/servlet-name

RE: creating web applications

2004-05-29 Thread swapna gupta
I think the problem cant be solved with Tomcat5. I tried the following solution with Tomcat4.1 and it works! Thanks, Swapna From: swapna gupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: creating web applications Date: Sat, 29 May 2004

Re: Socket Create not supported

2004-05-29 Thread Nikhil Sidhaye
Hello Jeanfrancois Arcand, No. I didn't know if by default installation of J2sdk1.4.x enable Security Manager. Currently I didn't have laptop. But I will send you error log as soon as possible. Thanks for your mail. ./Nikhil Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote: Nikhil Sidhaye wrote: Hello

RE: registering Tomcat as service

2004-05-29 Thread Jacob Kjome
Well, you can modify the service.bat or follow the instructions on the page I mentioned previously to change paramters from the command line. And, yes, I think this stuff is probably stored in the registry, although I haven't looked at the entries (haven't needed to). Some of the parameters

Managing Session Objects - Preventing a Degredation in Performance

2004-05-29 Thread Mike Duffy
I asked these question in the Struts list and only received a minimal response: Does anyone have any good ideas on managing session objects? In a complex application how do you insure that the session does not become over burdened with unnecessary objects, thus degrading system performance?

Re: Managing Session Objects - Preventing a Degredation in Performance

2004-05-29 Thread QM
On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 11:31:26AM -0700, Mike Duffy wrote: : I asked these question in the Struts list and only received a minimal response: Does anyone have : any good ideas on managing session objects? In a complex application how do you insure that the : session does not become over

Re: creating web applications

2004-05-29 Thread QM
On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 06:15:07AM +, swapna gupta wrote: : THANKS for directing me to the link. But my problem doesnt get solved by : the solution provided, i.e. : [snip] :servlet-mapping :servlet-nameinvoker/servlet-name :url-pattern/servlet/*/url-pattern :

Re: ajp13 protocol specifications

2004-05-29 Thread Bill Barker
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/common/AJPv13.html Nitin Verma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Where will I get ajp13 protocol specifications? I need to make my own mod_jk2's java variant.

Re: Managing Session Objects - Preventing a Degredation in Performance

2004-05-29 Thread Michael Labhard
One more option, if you absolutely cannot control the lifetimes of the session objects because the user at the browser is in control and may or may not need the object for some time to come, create a caching system by writing the oldest, largest or least used objects to a database in such a

XP tomcat service account access rights

2004-05-29 Thread Stuart Mackey
So I set up a limited user account to run my Tomcat service on XP Pro. My question is, what specific rights are need for which folders under CATALINA_HOME? It seems to run ok with read execute, list directory, and read for the whole branch with write specifically for the logs directory. I'm not

Re: XP tomcat service account access rights

2004-05-29 Thread QM
On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 05:28:44PM -0400, Stuart Mackey wrote: : So I set up a limited user account to run my Tomcat service on XP Pro. My : question is, what specific rights are need for which folders under : CATALINA_HOME? It seems to run ok with read execute, list directory, : and read for the

Re: Managing Session Objects - Preventing a Degredation in Performance

2004-05-29 Thread Mike Duffy
As I said in my original email: You could try to map every process exit and remove unneeded objects at then end of a process; however, implementing this might be burdensome in a complex application. Suggestion #2 fro QM makes this point and adds clarification: Obviously a process in this

Re: Managing Session Objects - Preventing a Degredation in Performance

2004-05-29 Thread QM
On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 07:18:27PM -0700, Mike Duffy wrote: : As I said in my original email: You could try to map every process exit : and remove unneeded objects at then end of a process; however, : implementing this might be burdensome in a complex application. -which is why I tend to push

Re: Managing Session Objects - Preventing a Degredation in Performance

2004-05-29 Thread Mike Duffy
H It doesn't seem like the You:cleanup tag concept would work if a user just clicked out of a process. Also, I do not like the idea of putting this type of cleanup in a custom tag (View tier). I'd like to keep the functionality of the MVC tiers as clean as possible. BTW: What is