Re: Modjk and Tomcat 5.5.4 problem

cleaned up and we stopped having problems, however, I'm not sure this was the correct way to do this, seems to work. Not sure if this is related to your problem. -Rick -Original Message- From: John Martyniak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 3:53 PM

Re: Modjk and Tomcat 5.5.4 problem

, cachesize, or cache_timeout set? -Rick -Original Message- From: John Martyniak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October 06, 2005 8:43 AM Posted To: Tomcat Dev Conversation: Modjk and Tomcat 5.5.4 problem Subject: Re: Modjk and Tomcat 5.5.4 problem Rick, Thanks

Modjk and Tomcat 5.5.4 problem

Has anyone had any problems with ModJK crashing the server? I haven't been able to fully debug yet, primarily because it doesn't update any logs to state there is a problem, and I can't reliably replicate the problem. I am using Apache 2.0.47, modjk 1.2.5 and tomcat 5.5.4 I think that it

A Problem with Apache, Mod_jk and Tomcat

I just put up a new app on Mac OSX server, Apache 2.0.47, mod_jk 1.2.4 and Tomcat 5.5.4. I currently have it configured to work in the following ways: http://apps:8080/appname --- straight out of the box. http://app/appname -- mod_jk and virtual hosts. When I run the application through the

Setting maximum logging on Tomcat 5.5.4

Hi everyone, I have recently upgraded all of my apps to run on Tomcat 5.5.4, and Struts 1.2.4. I would like to find out how to set the maximum level of logging. In the the version that I was using before (4.1.27) it automatically created several kinds of log files. The new version only creates

Tomcat 4.1.x and mod_jk config

Hi everyone, I am trying to configure my Apache server to talk to my Tomcat server using mod_jk. It is kind of a major nightmare. The first step for me is to get it working at any level. Meaning that I can do http://localhost/examples/jsp/index.jsp and it brings the page up and runs the jsp.

Using DNS name instead of port number

I would like to be able to use the following Virtual host apps.beforedawn.com to run my app. Instead of having to include the 8080. Their is also a Webserver running on the box. So that I could run http://apps.beforedawn.com/index.jsp So my question is can this be done inside of Tomcat, or will

Re: Using DNS name instead of port number

://apps.beforedawn.com/index.jsp http://diagnostics.beforedawn.com/index.jsp Is this possible? -John On 1/13/05 3:38 PM, Hassan Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John Martyniak wrote: I would like to be able to use the following Virtual host apps.beforedawn.com to run my app. Instead of having to include

Re: Using DNS name instead of port number

works! -john On 1/13/05 4:11 PM, Hassan Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John Martyniak wrote: The server currently only has one IP address and several virtual hosts. For example on this box I would to do the following: Web Server: Serves http://www.beforedawn.com Tomcat Server: http

Re: Using DNS name instead of port number

Thanks for the help. I will try and get the mod_jk working. I think that will give me the most flexibility for the future. -John On 1/13/05 5:53 PM, Hassan Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John Martyniak wrote: Unfortunately this is for one of my external boxes (read have to pay ungodly

Benefit of multiple workers?

I am preparing to set up my first production Tomcat using mod_jk. So what is the benefit of multiple workers? I can see that you can specify one worker per host, so the advantage would be that you could have one Webserver drive several app servers. I also read on this list, that you could use