Hi,
I'm running Tomcat 5.0.28 with JDK 1.5.0_01 on Fedora Core 3.
The problem that I'm having is pretty odd. It's taking Tomcat about 30
minutes to fully start up and start accepting connections. Here's where
it's getting hung up at from the startup logs:
Mar 30, 2005 10:52:10 AM
Hi Everyone,
Well, I finally solved this problem. OS patches didn't do the trick, still
had segmentation faults and unexplained crashes on startup and shutdown, no
core dumps, no error messages, and -server band-aid didn't work for me
either (I was running out of options!). The solution was to
Hi,
I'm getting this strange error in catalina.out on Red Hat Enterprise Linux
AS and CentOS:
Another exception has been detected while we were handling last error.
Dumping information about last error:
ERROR REPORT FILE = (N/A)
PC= 0x
SIGNAL
with CATALINA_OPTS.
Have a nice day ...
Sincerely,
Mike Cherichetti
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Shankar Unni
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 4:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Weird Red Hat Enterprise Startup
Mike Cherichetti (Renegade Internet) wrote
Ryan,
I've had good luck with the IBM JVM on Linux. The Sun JVM is slower, uses
more memory, and isn't as stable. At least that's been my experience with
it. I'd narrow your options down to IBM and BEA.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Lissack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I've had this happen twice in the past two days on two rather busy servers.
Both are running RedHat Linux 7.3, IBM JDK 1.4.1, and Tomcat 4.1 (one is
4.1.24 and the other is 4.1.27). After these exceptions hit the error log,
Tomcat stops responding:
2003-09-05 06:33:06
has
already been committed should it? Maybe I'm only seeing this because I've
disabled keep alive connections.
Anyone have any input? Should I submit something as a bug here?
Thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Mike Cherichetti (Renegade Internet)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday
I don't think this can be done with mappings. You can put an index.jsp file
with only a forward/redirect call in it to transfer control to your servlet.
I've done this before, seems to work quite well.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 9:24 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: maxProcessors problem
If I may ask how much physical memory do you have in the first place ?
Do you really have that much to give to the for the max heap size ?
Mike Cherichetti (Renegade Internet) wrote
Stefano,
You would probably be better off creating a thread to run this lengthy
process in the background and have your Servlet send back a please wait
response and refresh automatically after several seconds to check the status
until it completes and you can display all of the results. If
: Ben Ricker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 10:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: maxProcessors problem
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 16:59, Mike Cherichetti (Renegade Internet) wrote:
Doh! My mistake...I am thinking of the variable name *I* use in a script
that passes
I use the following script on RedHat 7.3 (I save this as
/etc/rc.d/init.d/tomcat):
#!/bin/bash
#
# Startup script for the Tomcat Web Server
#
# chkconfig: 345 84 16
# description: Tomcat is a World Wide Web server. It is used to serve \
# HTML, JSP, and servlets, and CGI if needed.
19, 2003 9:12 AM
To: Tomcat Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: maxProcessors problem
Howdy,
What's your -Xmx setting to the JVM?
Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics
-Original Message-
From: Mike Cherichetti (Renegade Internet)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August
: Ben Ricker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 11:18 AM
To: Tomcat Users
Subject: Re: maxProcessors problem
On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 15:42, Mike Cherichetti (Renegade Internet) wrote:
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: JVMCI015:OutOfMemoryError, cannot create
anymore
threads due
First off, I'm using RedHat Linux 7.3, IBM JDK 1.4.1, and Tomcat 4.1.24 on
an IBM xSeries with Dual Xeon 2 GHz processors, 2 GB RAM, and SCSI disks.
I'm trying to get Tomcat to handle a lot of traffic (4-5 million hits per
day) and bumping up against a problem I for life of me can't figure out.
Todd,
Putting the IP address of the user in the session won't work too well. An
AOL user for example may have a different IP address every time they send in
a request. And, it's obviously possible for someone to spoof an IP
address.
The best solution I've found to prevent sessions from being
)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.jav
a:619)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:568)
Have a nice day ...
Sincerely,
Mike Cherichetti
Renegade Internet
Internet Advertising Delivery Solutions
www.renegadeinternet.com
Phone (724) 658-6346
doStartTag() throws JspException
{
try
{
...
}
catch (Exception exception)
{
throw new JspException(exception);
}
finally
{
release();
}
return SKIP_BODY;
}
Have a nice day ...
Sincerely,
Mike Cherichetti
Renegade Internet
Internet Advertising Delivery Solutions
James,
Use response.sendRedirect() instead of the RequestDispatcher. That will
change the URL in the browser. If you want to stick with the
RequestDispatcher, you'll have to add some logic to catch a resubmission of
the same data (possibly use a hidden field in your forms with a unique
:
Thanks so very much... I saw their is a config option in the Jasper to
turn off tag pooling. do you thing that would work too, of shouldI
impliment it in my source code. I'm gonna take a look at it right now.
Shawn
-Original Message-
From: Mike Cherichetti (Renegade Internet)
[mailto
positive performance gain. For our
site, which has many tags per page, it is the latter case :) If you're
thinking about turning pooling off you'll need to test the effects on
performance.
Jon
PS We had to go through this process on the upgrade. I share your pain
Mike Cherichetti (Renegade Internet
RedHat Linux 7.3
IBM JDK 1.4.1
Tomcat 4.1.24
Is it possible to disable KeepAlive connections with the Coyote HTTP/1.1
connector? If it's not possible to turn them off, is it possible to lower
the request limit and timeout period for them?
Have a nice day ...
Sincerely,
Mike Cherichetti
on the Connector. Tomcat 5 has a more
intuitive option, but it works the same way.
If you have the maxKeepAliveRequests 1, then the 'connectionTimeout'
attribute on the Connector determines how long it will wait for the next
request.
Mike Cherichetti (Renegade Internet) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
message
23 matches
Mail list logo
