Peddireddy Srikanth wrote:
And they argue that as Tomcat it self runs inside a JVM, which inturn
is a single process all the threads etc wil be simulted ones (and not
the native threads) and hence it will not scale up well under high
loads.
Is this argument a valid one or just a
David Thielen wrote:
The url www.windward.net/forums fails while www.windward.net/forums/
succeeds.
My uriworkermap has:
/forums/*=ajp13w
try:
/forums|/*=ajp13w
This will actually create two maps:
/forums=ajp13w
/forums/*=ajp13w
Regards,
Mladen.
marc ratun wrote:
Hi,
I just read an article about webapp benchmarks [1] and they mentioned that
apache+mod_jk+tomcat is about 30% slower than pure tomcat.
This is sad. Until now I believed that the performance decrease with
apache/mod_jk would be marginal.
Why would that be sad?
30%
Arup Vidyerthy wrote:
Hey dude, stop moaning and read the bottom of the email!! Come on - little
bit of proactive intuitiveness is all that required here!!
Hildegard Bronkhorst
Senior Facilities Manager
Kagiso Integrated Services (Pty) Ltd.
Tel: +27 11 844 2015
Fax: +27 11 844 2130
Mobile: +27
Edgar Alves wrote:
Hi,
I'm using the domain property in the same situation as the one
discussed in this thread. Any reason why I shouldn't use the domain
property and rely on the worker names instead?
Domain is supposed to be used with multiple workers sharing the
same jvmRoute having
Allistair Crossley wrote:
Hi,
I thought I had this sussed but it seems I haven't :( 2 tomcats, 1 machine, JK to balance with stick sessions. The following configuration works in that JK routes requests to both the tomcats and so on.
Did you set the jvmRoute=tomcat1 inside server.xml Engine
Danico Lee wrote:
i got tomcat5, apache1.3 and jk1.2.14. i'm very confused with JkMount.
in my http.conf, i have:
VirtualHost our_server:80
ServerName our_server
DocumentRoot ${tomcat_home}/webapps/test1
JkAutoAlias ${tomcat_home}/webapps
JkMount /test1/* worker1
Xuekun Hu wrote:
Hi,
From performance point, which connector will be used for TOMCAT
intergration with Apache? proxy_ajp or mod_jk?
I read some docs which said mod_jk should have better performance than
proxying. While proxy_ajp in Apache2.1 is an addition to the mod_proxy
and uses Tomcat's
Stanczak Group wrote:
Well, maybe I've just make a mistake somewhere. I looked at my
jsp-examples/ url work with ssl and without in mod_jk. Where should I
look to see why this one works but my app doesn't?
Stanczak Group wrote:
I know this has been asked, but the all the emails and on-line
Stanczak Group wrote:
I'm not familiar with mod_jk, but in Tomcat when using SSL I can put in
a security constraint and it will redirect to a secure connection, so
that's why I'm making it sound like a redirect.
Hmm.
You are still unclear.
Seems to me that you are saying that you can access
Allistair Crossley wrote:
Hi Chaps,
If anyone is interested, I blogged last night on my experience setting up ...
It would be great if you provide a link to your blog :)
Regards,
Mladen.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Gary Moh wrote:
According to http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk/, the
current stable version is 1.2.10.
Thanks for spotting that. Updated to reflect the 1.2.14 stable.
Now, four additional releases have been made. Does 1.2.10 remain the stable
version?
No.
All
Frédéric Viollet wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm using mod_jk - 1.2.14.1 and apache - 1.3.19
I would like to link statically mod_jk in Apache in Windows environment.
Has anyone already managed this?
The configure --with-apache command works fine for Solaris and AIX; and
it compiles and links
David Hay wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to specify multiple workers for the same Tomcat instance?
Yes.
But this will impose additional load to the tomcat doubling the number
of connections from apache to mod_jk for each worker.
For ten workers you may end up with 2500 connections with
250
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone, i'd like to develop an independent connector based on TCP
following the AJP 1.3 case.
I wish you all the luck ;)
I'd like to know if AJP 1.3 handles requests
sent from a generic client as http 1.1.
No.
Does it forward the requests to a
servlet?
Sheets, Jerald wrote:
In your mod_jk.conf, you have JkMount directives like so:
JkMount /servlet/* ajp13
JkMount /jsp-examples/* ajp13
JkMount /servlets-examples/* ajp13
I find that in your mounts that if you simply remove the trailing slash
in these, you can then call those URIs without the
Darrell Bechtel wrote:
Both workers are setup to communicate to the localhost using port 8009??
Perhaps your /etc/hosts file has a entry that resolves the 'localhost'
to that IP address. Anyhow use 127.0.0.1 instead localhost to be sure.
Regards,
Mladen.
markus wrote:
Im particularly interested in the new load-balancing features added to
the newest jk releases.
What makes me uneasy is the constant referral to each release being
ratified as a Stable
release in the next week, etc.
Is JK 1.2.14 far from release and will this be ratified as
Findlay, Colin, VF-NZ wrote:
Hi,
[Wed Jun 01 02:56:19 2005] [error] write::jk_isapi_plugin.c (619):
WriteClient failed with 2745
Means that the client closed the browser before all data has been set.
[Wed Jun 01 02:56:19 2005] [info] ajp_process_callback::jk_ajp_common.c
(1363):
Derrick Koes wrote:
I've run with this configuration elsewhere without error. I'm not certain what
the issue is. I have this same problem without using the loadbalancer worker.
I can't even get to jkstatus. Any help is greatly appreciated.
The problem is with the installation.
You
Nikola Milutinovic wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then you're messing it up. HTTP has no paradigm of a session, which is
what you need here. HTTP has a very clear request/response model. It is
not designed to hold the HTTP channel open indefinitely and will break
off after a timeout.
Sander de Boer wrote:
Hi,
I have tested mod_jk 1.2.13. But sometimes my tomcat becomes completely
be locked for a while. A downgrade to 1.2.10 solves that problem.
So I mean there is a something like a locking problem in 1.2.13, but I
don't know where and how.
Is tomcat locked or your response
Leonardo Otoni de Assis wrote:
Mladen,
I do the copy of server sub-directory in the jvm directory to the jre
directoy. See:
jvm directory
D:\Powerlogic\jdk1.5.0_02\jre\bin\server (with the jvm.dll);
copy to:
C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.5.0_02\bin
when install the service again:
Leonardo Otoni de Assis wrote:
Can use the -server parameter (jvm 5) in the service.bat of the tomcat559?
I try use this parameter but receive errors after startup of service Apache Tomcat with
the message in event viewer of windows2000: The Apache Tomcat service terminated
with
Anatoly Kern wrote:
Hello!
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/config/workers.html
(recovery_options=3,prepost_timeout=100,connect_timeout=100) but all
Hi,
prepost_timeout and connect_timeout are defined in milliseconds,
Like you said read the:
Hi,
What is your session timeout on tomcat?
It might be that the session simply times out,
so the next tomcat is elected from the load
balancer.
Regards,
Mladen.
Edlira Kumbarÿe7e wrote:
Hello,
It
doesn't seem to work. Each time I refresh the page, it
get served from the same
Edlira Kumbarÿe7e wrote:
I don't think it's the session timeout on tomcat
because, as I said in my previous message,I don't see
a pattern in the time pages are served from the same
tomcat. In other words, a page gets served from
tomcat1 maybe 4 times (each page refresh), then 2
Dan Baggott wrote:
Hi,
I'm attempting to build JK-1.2.11 on Solaris 2.8 (sparc) for use with
Apache 1.3.
There was a thread on the same subject but for the Apache 2 with the
same problem. The reason why build fails is because the Solaris 8 make
is some sort of BSD make that does not populate
J. W. Ballantine wrote:
I'm trying to build mod_jk 1.2.11 on a solaris 2.8
system and it fails with:
The configuration command is:
./configure --with-apxs=/local/APACHE/Apache2/bin/apxs --enable-jni
--with-java-home=/a2/JAVA/java --with-java-platform=2
jni will not work anyhow on any unix
Alessandro Fredianelli wrote:
Setting the --StartMode parameter of procrun to java or exe seems to be
not working.
Any other special setting is needed in order to have these parameters work?
--StartMode=java|jvm
It defines if the JNI or out of process java.exe will be used.
The same is for
Alessandro Fredianelli wrote:
that's how i create the service.
If i set startmode=java in order to have the possibility to specify an
account different than LocalSystem,
procrun doesent start.
Hmm, are you using the CVS HEAD or last released version?
Any log messages?
Also does you Administrator
Michael Südkamp wrote:
The strange thing is that other W2003 webservers we set up the same way have
not this problem. We are even sure that the problem webservers had not had
this problem some weeks ago.
How about your dns? I wold suggest that you use IP addresses for
your host names.
Do you think
Patty O'Reilly wrote:
Thanks very much for responding. I'm still stuggling with an ever
growing number of connections to the apache server and an ever growing
number of threads on my tomcat server. I'm fairly certain it is
not the application. I have all three timeouts set but no joy.
Torsten Krah wrote:
Hello,
is there any chance, to get mod_jk so configured, that it can handle jsp
files, servlets ( complete webapps ) in the apache mod_userdir
directory?
I want to have ~/pubic_html/*.jsp interpreted by tomcat but it seems
mod_jk isnt able to handle it, am i right or wrong?
Any
Haris Papadopoulos wrote:
IIS logs do not contain any information about the page that Tomcat serves.
Instead, the following line:
2005-04-21 14:58:12 192.168.1.59 GET /jakarta/isapi_redirect.dll - 80 -
192.168.1.11
Guernsey, Byron (GE Consumer Industrial) wrote:
It uses a urimap.properties file instead of JkMounts.
OK.
The config directives in httpd.conf look like:
IfDefine MOD_JK
JkLogLeveldebug
JkShmSize 300
JkShmFile /usr/local/apache/logs/jk1-ssodev.shm
JkWorkersFile
Guernsey, Byron (GE Consumer Industrial) wrote:
worked just fine under Apache 2 and we haven't seen any issues in the
JK1 code or cookies with respect to the ':' in the JVM Routes. To you
it might seem easier to change the jvmRoute, but unfortunately there are
literally 100's of production app
Lionel Farbos wrote:
VirtualHost myHost
ServerName myVhost1
#this works :
# JkMount /testServlet/* ajp13
#this doesn't work :
#JkMountFile /usr2/web/VirtualHosts/testServlet.properties
JkMountFile /usr2/web/etc/testServlet.properties
Well, the mount files are overriden if JkMountCopy On is set.
cachesize is used only for threaded apache's like
1.3 on windows or netware; apache2 with worker_mpm, etc...
The size must reflect the number of threads per child
process that for prefork mpms like 1.3 on unixes is
always 1, so there is no need to set it.
Each apache instance needs it's own shared
Lionel Farbos wrote:
but I tried also this :
VirtualHost ...
JkMountFile B
/VirtualHost
(without JkMountFile A and JkMountCopy On)
and this doesn't work either :-(
Well, then it's a bug :)
I'll check that, to see how it can be fixed.
Regards,
Mladen.
Lionel Farbos wrote:
Thank you again.
So it means than I can have 1 local JkShmFile on my web1 and other local
JkShmFile on my web2.
But, if, in web1_jkStatus, I disable 1 worker from my cluster (loadbalancer),
I also have to disable it from my web2_jkStatus ? Right ?
Well, you can try to use the
Guernsey, Byron (GE Consumer Industrial) wrote:
The problem was a duplicate worker entry. Apparently, in JK2,
duplicates were ignored. I've written a perl script that converts the
JK2 config to a JK1 config because of the large number of entries- I'll
just need to have it validate that there
Guernsey, Byron (GE Consumer Industrial) wrote:
The NULL factory for ajp13*ajp13 looks odd to me...but that seems like
an error create 1 worker and I didn't expect it to cause no workers to
be available. I don't really want to run this with Apache 1.3 long
term, but I understood it should
Andrey Grebnev wrote:
Hello All,
I try to use:
- Apache 1.3.33 under Windows XP SP2
- mod_jk-1.2.10-apache-1.3.33.so
IfModule mod_jk.c
JkWorkerProperty worker.list=ajp13w
JkWorkerProperty worker.ajp13w.type=ajp13
JkWorkerProperty worker.ajp13w.host=localhost
Geoff Wiggs wrote:
I know this question has probably been asked 1000 times, but here I go
again.
OK. Once for all :)
RewriteEngine On
RewriteRule (.*) /servlets-examples$1 [PT]
I have Apache / Tomcat and jk_mod all running correctly. If I hit the URL
correctly (i.e. www.server.com/context/) my
David Owens wrote:
Here's a good article:
http://raibledesigns.com/tomcat/
Actually it has one error:
# list the workers by name
worker.list=tomcat1, tomcat2, loadbalancer
It should be:
worker.list=loadbalancer
See the:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/config/workers.html
Guernsey, Byron (GE Consumer Industrial) wrote:
To add to this- separating the lines into two worker.list lines *almost*
worked.
It seems that when I have a line like:
worker.list=jkstatus,app1,app2,...,app72
worker.list=app73,app74,...
This will not work. There is even a bugzilla
entry on that,
Lionel Farbos wrote:
Some questions :
- Why don't you provide any more a binary release for linux (since 1.2.6) ?
It's up to the contributors (jk committers).
Now, my company (JBoss) has invested a great deal of
money to provide me with hardware and software needed for such tasks,
but you'll have
Lakshmi Narayanan K. wrote:
Hi Mladen,
Now, my question is, can I roll out only this executable as that of
Tomcat version 5.0.28? Or do I need to roll out some other files as
well?
Sure you can. Tomcat5.exe and Tomcat5w.exe are not part of tomcat,
but rather jakarta-commons/daemon project. The
t.n.a. wrote:
Don't really know why I'm writing in english :), but here goes...
Da, mozda bi bilo bolje da si pitao neku lokalnu grupu,
recimo hr.fido.java.
Tomcat/jetty/jboss hosting in Croatia seems to be much more of a problem
than I anticipated, so I need advice on how to proceed. Just go
Chris Egolf wrote:
Lionel Farbos wrote:
- I've not found any documentation on the status worker (and web
page) and the ability to reload jk configuration without a reload of
apache. Can you tell me more about these new features (or give me a
link I missed) ?
I second this request.
Yes, seems we
Hi,
First of all you will need to learn how to quote ;)
I do not understand what is your question?
First of all make sure your apache configuration is
working for vitual hosts, and then add mod_jk mappings.
The easiest way is to create a simple separate index.html
page for each vitual host and see
e wrote:
I watched the JBoss webinar, which was very helpful, but I still can't
understand how to tune the thread settings.
I use tc 5.5.7 and worker apache2. In the webinar, it was stated that
apache maxclients should be the same value as maxThreads on tomcat. On
a heavily loaded apache, with 10
Lakshmi Narayanan K. wrote:
If there are many developers on this list, then
why aren't there any replies? :(
Well, I replied to you already, and I wrote the damn thing :).
So, as usual, your replies are eagerly awaited...
Try to use the tomcat5.exe from 5.0.30 or better from 5.5.8.
I have not
Faine, Mark wrote:
Has anyone succeeded in getting Tomcat 5 to run in-process with Apache 2
using mod_jk? Does anyone know of a howto on this? I've read the docs,
I've searched the web, I have it working using AJP13 but I have had no luck
on getting it to work in-process. I don't even know
Lakshmi Narayanan K. wrote:
Are you doing this from the tomcat5 binary from TC 5.0.30? I ask this
because we have already rolled out TC 5.0.28 onto production systems,
and if so, I cant roll out the newer TC 5.0.30 on them. :
Use that one:
The Apache Jakarta Tomcat team is proud to announce the immediate
availability of Jakarta Tomcat Connectors 1.2.10. The release
contains a significant number of bug fixes and new features.
Please see the
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/changelog.html
for a full list of changes.
e wrote:
Under what circumstances would you change it from the defualt 1mb?
If you wish to tune the memory usage.
Each worker uses 1024 bytes of data, so this gives max of 1024
workers that is too high I agree.
Shared memory was meant to be used for uri mappings too, but
we decided to use
Lakshmi Narayanan K. wrote:
Hi Jason,
Thanks for your suggestion. I would like to modify the registry by
hand as a LAST resort only. Isn't there a way to do this via the
tocmat5 command line tool itself? If there isn't any, then of course,
I would have to do it by hand by modifying the registry.
VAN DER MARLIERE FREDERIC wrote:
The application works fine but I can't get the user login with the
getRemoteUser() method, I get null !!!
Does someone know why?
Do I have to configure something in Tomcat ?
Yes.
Set tomcatAuthentication=false for AJP connector.
Regards,
Mladen.
Sander de Boer wrote:
The beta mod_jk 1.2.9(and older) produce a lot of errors like this:
INFO: connection timeout reached
Without configuration files, Apache version, OS, etc...,
it's hard to tell, but I suspect that you have some problems
with either your clients being slow for the connection
Arnar Gestsson wrote:
If I send request using HEAD method to a servlet, the servlet allways
shows the method as GET. POST method works as expected.
This has been fixed already see:
Sander de Boer wrote:
Connector port=8082
minProcessors=150 maxProcessors=255
enableLookups=false acceptCount=10
debug=0 connectionTimeout=3
disableUploadTimeout=true
protocol=AJP/1.3 /
The docs says socket_timeout
sander wrote:
If have added the socketTimeout option:
Connector port=8082
minProcessors=150 maxProcessors=255
enableLookups=false acceptCount=10
debug=0 connectionTimeout=3
disableUploadTimeout=true
socketTimeout=3
The Apache Jakarta Tomcat team is proud to announce the immediate
availability of Jakarta Tomcat Connectors 1.2.9-beta. The release
contains a significant number of bug fixes and new features.
We expect it to be ratified as a Stable release when the vote takes
place in the next two weeks.
Please
e wrote:
Yes, any word on when jk 1.2.9 will be released? days, weeks?
Beta will be tagged tomorrow (see tomcat-dev),
vote is about a week.
Regards,
Mladen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Dan Thiffault wrote:
if (d-status=500) {
jk_log(l, JK_LOG_ERROR,
Tomcat server returned status=%d,d-status);
JK_TRACE_EXIT(l);
return JK_FALSE;
}
I may end up using a case statement and preventing apache from trying
the next worker on bad request or something like that. Hope
Paul Puschmann wrote:
Hi,
we want to use Apache2 (2.0.53) as a frontend for out Tomcat (4.1.31)
and don't get the right configuration for our jk2 (2.0.4).
This all runs with Java 1.4.2_06 on Debian Sarge x86.
Do not use JK2. Use JK instead.
See:
Sng Wee Jim wrote:
I am using IIS 5.0 on Win2k Server edition. Will jk 1.2.9 solve the issue for
IIS too?
IIS and Apache on Windows are single child systems so the runtime data
was already shared among all clients.
I speak here about 1.2.8. Previous versions have lb code broken.
You'll have to
Bedrijven.nl wrote:
Hello,
I installed Tomcat 557 and create several instances for development
applications by using the CATALINA_BASE parameter.
So I set up about 10 webapplication on my localhost that I can start with
startup.bat. Now what I want to do is to create for each webapplication an
own
Mikhail Kruk wrote:
No one responded to my previous question, so let me try again.
Is anyone here running Tomcat 5.0.x + mod_jk + Apache and downloading
large files through it with normal a throughput?
Server Software:Apache/2.0.53
Server Hostname:localhost
Server Port:
Sng Wee Jim wrote:
I am load-balancing tomcat 5.0.28 using JK1.2/AJP1.3.
Cool ;)
I noticed the loadbalancer virtual JK worker redirect requests to the tomcat
instances in a round-robin fashion, without taking into account which tomcat
has a higher number of active sessions.
You must note what jk
Richard Russell wrote:
[Wed Mar 02 12:09:09 2005] [info] jk_handler::mod_jk.c (1691):
Service returned error=1 with status=200 for worker=ajp13
This is the client error, probably meaning that the client has
closed the connection before sending all the data expected.
(like setting
Lionel Farbos wrote:
1) In server.xml :
- uncomment the AJP 1.3 Connector (on port 8009),
- set the jvmRoute in each Engine
example : Engine name=Standalone defaultHost=host1 debug=0
jvmRoute=t1_ajp13
Session route *must* consists only of alphanumeric characters.
See the:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mladen,
Just to clarify - will this allow us to configure the load-balancing on the
fly according to the load of the tomcat's involved?
If you mean to balance according to CPU utilization, it won't
do that. For that we would need some native component that
would measure
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mladen,
We'd have our own mechanism to calculate the load on a particular server -
I was actually asking if, and more importantly how (!), we'd adjust the
balance factors on the fly from our app?
Well, you can use http client request in a form like:
Behrang Saeedzadeh wrote:
Hi all
What are the benefits of running an application like Tomcat with as a
daemon (with JSVC) vs. running it like a normal application?
In one sentence:
Running as non-root on port 1024
Mladen.
-
To
Susan Hoddinott wrote:
Everytime I resubscribe to the user list I am bombarded with Spam.
Well, that is something that you will have to live with.
I've even received a couple of emails where people even
threaten me with the FBI, because they where receiving commit
messages from Tomcat cvs on
Behrang Saeedzadeh wrote:
In one sentence:
Running as non-root on port 1024
In one sentence: Thanks a lot ;-)
In more than one sentence: Thanks a lot, but what's the benefit of
daemons (Services) in a Windows environment?
None, even if you manage to run a unix daemon on the windows
at the first
Rodrigo Avila wrote:
Hi!
[...] child pid 6645 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
It only happen when I use mod_jk 1.2.8 compiled by me
I use Apache 1.3.33 (slackware package found at www.linuxpackages.net)
and Tomcat 5.0.28 (binary distribution).
Do you have ForwardDirectories enabled?
Remove
Scott Sauyet wrote:
Jason Bainbridge wrote:
The Apache Tomcat service on Local Computer started and then
stopped. Some services stop automatically if they have no work
to do, for example, the Performace Logs and Alerts service.
I'm not finding anything in the Tomcat logs, which makes
Rodrigo Avila wrote:
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:19:23 +0100, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have ForwardDirectories enabled?
Remove 'JkOptions ForwardDirectories' and there shouldn't
be segfaults any more.
This has been fixed in the cvs, and will not be present in
next release scheduled
Lionel Farbos wrote:
A question for JK workers :
I see in the JK 1.2.9 roadmap that a dynamic change of workers'properties will
be possible at runtime.
But, actually, when I do apache reload, the change is possible at runtime without loosing requests. No ?
Yes and no. You will lose all the
Allistair Crossley wrote:
February 23, 2005 at 1pm Eastern Daylight Time (GMT -04:00, New York).
I believe this should be GMT -5 however? No?
February 23, 2005 at 18:00 GMT.
So calculate to your own timezone :).
regards,
Mladen
-
Michael Stiller wrote:
No one any clues on this issue? I've got about 3000 connections hanging
around in CLOSE_WAIT now. Especially that 1 byte hanging in the receive
buffer keeps me puzzled.
Did you tried the latest CVS HEAD?
It contains the hard close socket by disabling lingering.
Further
Michael Stiller wrote:
I tried something i checked out from cvs last friday.
Use more recent :)
The version is tomcat-connectors 1.2.9.
The OS ist Fedora Core 3.
Seems that I miss the OS.
It contains the hard close socket by disabling lingering.
Where may i learn about the hard close patch.
Michael Stiller wrote:
Ok, just running a fresh cvs tree. The problem is *still* there, but it
seems that there are fewer sockets hanging around at the moment.
Ok, we are getting somewhere :).
Ok fixed that. Config is now:
...
worker.proc2111.port=12111
worker.proc2111.lbfactor=1
Michael Stiller wrote:
Also what are you using for testing? ab or...
Eh hm it is in production now ;) So we use the clients for testing. 8)
You are really brave :).
Just checking without the recycle_timeout.
What happens if you issue 'apachectl restart' ?
Can you make 'JkLoglevel trace' and post
Dan Carwin wrote:
He references the jvmRoute=servername variable which needs to match a
like variable tomcatId in workers2.properties. Of course
workers.properties doesn't have the tomcatId variable. The funny thing
is in the change notes for the jk connector, I see that Bill Barker made
some
Michael Greer wrote:
Should I take the trouble?
local_worker and local_worker_only flags will be deprecated.
(already are with the current 1.2.9-dev)
There has been more powerful mechanism implemented, that is
IMO more clearer and acts like it should.
1.2.9 has shared memory and status page that
Michael Greer wrote:
Mladen ,
That sounds like the right solution! I think I remember the status page
from jk2, and it is a good idea.
Yes, we are trying to backport all goodies from jk2 now that is
deprecated and no longer maintained.
Not only that. It will have options to fully edit properties,
John Gordon wrote:
I'm having a bit of trouble getting isapi_redirect.dll to work and generate a
log. If anyone can see what step I'm missing please let me know. I have done
the following. I am running a Windows Server 2003. My Tomcat version is
5.0.28. My IIS version is 6.0.
I get no logs
Didier McGillis wrote:
Actually I believe its the opposite. Apache serves the certificate the
communication between Tomcat and Apache shouldnt be public anyway.
Apache makes the SSL handshake and passes any client certificate to
Tomcat. Any servlet sees that like it came directly from Tomcat.
Dola Woolfe wrote:
Thanks for all responses. I have some new info.
3. Finally, and the most hopeful point, the
better-but-slower server is running Norton virus
services. Restarting the machine in safe mode (w/
networkin) solved the problem. Does this settle it? If
so, what particular setting in
Betts, Chuck wrote:
Hi,
We originally thought that adding the configuration setting
worker.app_dmnX.socket_timeout=10 would at least stop the requests from
hanging indefinitely, but that didn't seem to help. Does anyone have
experience with this, and can recommend configuration settings to use to
Thor Muller wrote:
I think others have had this problem but I can't find an answer that
helps me. I have a fresh install of redhat9 and I've installed Apache
2.053, PHP 4.3.1 and Tomcat 5.5, all without a hitch. Now I'm trying
to compile the mod_jk.so and it gives me the following error. Any
Antti Granqvist wrote:
Hi,
I have problems in running this combination on Windows server 2003. I
have set up jk 1.2 on w2k/xp and iis 5 several times without problems.
But I think now I am out of luck. Service is run in 'IIS 5.0 isolation
mode'. I used the installer for jk 1.2.8 and set
Ellen Blank wrote:
Hello,
wondering how soon jk-1.2.8 binaries will become available for Solaris
platform, and whether it makes sense to wait or go ahead with the
jk-1.2.6 in a mean while.
Well, I don't have Solaris box to make a build :).
Also there are couple versions of them that are binary
Richard Mixon (qwest) wrote:
John,
From what I gather, this is the purpose of the properties local_worker
and local_worker_only properties in the workers.properties file. They
are documented at the bottom of this page:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/config/workers.html
Derek Greer wrote:
I'm trying to use the Tomcat Connector to do load balancing through the
IIS filter, however the sessions do not seem to be 'sticky. According
to the documentation, the session is set to sticky by default. Even so,
after seeing non-sticky behavior I set my lb worker
1 - 100 of 230 matches
Mail list logo
