Re: Benchmark results for 4.1.12 vs 4.1.16

2002-12-06 Thread Remy Maucherat
Peter Lin wrote: today I took the day off, but tomorrow I plan on running more benchmarks. I ran into one weird behavior when I ran the same jmeter test with 10 threads for 5K iterations. Half way through tomcat stopped accepting connections, but was fine. If I wait two minutes, it continue to

RE: Benchmark results for 4.1.12 vs 4.1.16

2002-12-06 Thread Shapira, Yoav
: Benchmark results for 4.1.12 vs 4.1.16 today I took the day off, but tomorrow I plan on running more benchmarks. I ran into one weird behavior when I ran the same jmeter test with 10 threads for 5K iterations. Half way through tomcat stopped accepting connections, but was fine. If I wait two minutes

Re: Benchmark results for 4.1.12 vs 4.1.16

2002-12-06 Thread Peter Lin
I've done a fair amount of jsp and servlet development since 99 when JSP .9 spec wasn't implemented in most servlet containers. I doubt I can provide insight into improving reliability that tomcat developers haven't already thought of. Most of the projects I've worked on the last three

Re: Benchmark results for 4.1.12 vs 4.1.16

2002-12-05 Thread Remy Maucherat
Peter Lin wrote: I forgot to mention the Jmeter settings I used. All tests were with 1 thread for 5000 iterations. The first two image tests used images for tomcat. The third image test with 194.5k image was a simple screen capture of my desktop. Thanks for the small benchmark. It is a bit odd

Re: Benchmark results for 4.1.12 vs 4.1.16

2002-12-05 Thread Peter Lin
today I took the day off, but tomorrow I plan on running more benchmarks. I ran into one weird behavior when I ran the same jmeter test with 10 threads for 5K iterations. Half way through tomcat stopped accepting connections, but was fine. If I wait two minutes, it continue to accept requests.

Re: Benchmark results for 4.1.12 vs 4.1.16

2002-12-04 Thread Peter Lin
I forgot to mention the Jmeter settings I used. All tests were with 1 thread for 5000 iterations. The first two image tests used images for tomcat. The third image test with 194.5k image was a simple screen capture of my desktop. peter Peter Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm posting some