> "This Guy Thinks He Knows What He Is Doing"
> -Original Message-
> From: liug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: February 12, 2003 2:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Connector issues - jk2, 4.1.18, 2.0.44
> Eric L. Wittle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
He Is Doing"
> -Original Message-
> From: liug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: February 12, 2003 2:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Connector issues - jk2, 4.1.18, 2.0.44
> Eric L. Wittle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> # Map the Tomcat ex
quot;
"This Guy Thinks He Knows What He Is Doing"
-Original Message-
From: liug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: February 12, 2003 2:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Connector issues - jk2, 4.1.18, 2.0.44
Eric L. Wittle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # Map the
Eric L. Wittle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # Map the Tomcat examples webapp to the Web server uri space
> [uri:/examples/*]
> info=Map the whole webapp
> In my Tomcat 4.1.18 conf directory, my jk2.properties files contains the
> folloing:
> handler.list=apr,channelSocket,request
> channelSocket.
My version has the "secret sauce" option fully enabled.
I am SUPER COMPILER. LOL
John
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric L. Wittle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 11:18 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> S
Jake,
I had a similar problem, but with the jk2 binary I downloaded. It
wouldn't run with 2.0.44. I tried the mod_jk2.so that is on John
Turner's site, and it loaded. I don't know what he did to build it, but
it is clearly radically different from the binary on the Jakarta site,
since the Jakarta
-
From: "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 3:23 PM
Subject: RE: Connector issues - jk2, 4.1.18, 2.0.44
>
> Current versions of JK and JK2 are fully compatible with Apach
Current versions of JK and JK2 are fully compatible with Apache 2.0.43 and
2.0.44.
First, are you sure you compiled the connector against the Apache 2.0.44
source? RH 8 comes with a munged Apache 2.0.40 if you took the defaults.
Is it possible that, while building the connectors, the APXS for th
