RE: JProfiler with 5.0.16 vs 5.0.18 Strange behaviour

2004-01-21 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Howdy, On the 5.0.16 profile just 2 requests to the webapp made the heap profile have a scale of 100-200MB being used. Now on 5.0.18 it is 10-30MB. This is a very good change, to use far less memory. I'm wondering what your pages do that two requests need that much memory, but that's besides

RE: JProfiler with 5.0.16 vs 5.0.18 Strange behaviour

2004-01-21 Thread Allistair Crossley
with 5.0.16 vs 5.0.18 Strange behaviour Howdy, On the 5.0.16 profile just 2 requests to the webapp made the heap profile have a scale of 100-200MB being used. Now on 5.0.18 it is 10-30MB. This is a very good change, to use far less memory. I'm wondering what your pages do that two requests need

Re: JProfiler with 5.0.16 vs 5.0.18 Strange behaviour

2004-01-21 Thread Remy Maucherat
Allistair Crossley wrote: I read about the leak and some other posts but it seemed that Remy did not consider it to be anything many people would run into or even a big leak. The leak can be significant in some cases. But it's easy to avoid on 5.0.16 (increase maxSpareThreads), and you'll need a

RE: JProfiler with 5.0.16 vs 5.0.18 Strange behaviour

2004-01-21 Thread Allistair Crossley
] Sent: 21 January 2004 17:21 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: JProfiler with 5.0.16 vs 5.0.18 Strange behaviour Allistair Crossley wrote: I read about the leak and some other posts but it seemed that Remy did not consider it to be anything many people would run into or even a big leak

Re: JProfiler with 5.0.16 vs 5.0.18 Strange behaviour

2004-01-21 Thread Remy Maucherat
Allistair Crossley wrote: Hey, How would you explain what I have posted about JProfiler for 5.0.16 and 5.0.18? That was just 2 people traffic on a development box!! 5.0.16 was consuming over 100MB and now it does not go above 30MB. The memory used by this release should be equivalent. Your