RE: Redeployment of War over and over Supported?

2004-02-04 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Howdy, Would multiple Tomcat instances be run in a production environment as well? Yeah, that's what I meant when I said one webapp per instance. If you have multiple webapps, that's multiple tomcat instances ;) Of course you can keep the admin or manager webapps also running on each instance

RE: Redeployment of War over and over Supported?

2004-02-04 Thread Tom . Williams
Howdy, Would multiple Tomcat instances be run in a production environment as well? Yeah, that's what I meant when I said one webapp per instance. If you have multiple webapps, that's multiple tomcat instances ;) Of course you can keep the admin or manager webapps also running on each

RE: Redeployment of War over and over Supported?

2004-02-04 Thread David Ramsey
My personal experience has shown both. Shops that plan for enterprise wide services tend to get large servers and host multiple webapps on one container on such machines. This lends itself well to centralized administration, etc. Shops that add webapps incrementally or at the departmental levels

RE: Redeployment of War over and over Supported?

2004-02-04 Thread Tom . Williams
My personal experience has shown both. Shops that plan for enterprise wide services tend to get large servers and host multiple webapps on one container on such machines. This lends itself well to centralized administration, etc. Shops that add webapps incrementally or at the departmental

RE: Redeployment of War over and over Supported?

2004-02-04 Thread David Ramsey
Everyone I've seen uses one container from one vendor. WebLogic and WebSphere appear to be fairly popular choices but I've heard of lots of Tomcat and JBoss usage throughout Texas as well. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the feedback. :) Do you know if the larger shops tend to use

RE: Redeployment of War over and over Supported?

2004-02-03 Thread Tom . Williams
Would multiple Tomcat instances be run in a production environment as well? We're developing a webapp and having to retart Tomcat with each webapp installation is one of our concerns. Peace... Tom

RE: Redeployment of War over and over Supported?

2004-02-02 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Howdy, Wow, OK, thanks for the great insight. In other words, it's safe to assume to always restart Tomcat when deploying webapps. That, of course, is less than ideal. For testing, that just makes the development time longer (and more complicated, since now we have to remember to restart

Re: Redeployment of War over and over Supported?

2004-02-02 Thread Seth Ladd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Shapira, Yoav wrote: | Howdy, | | |Wow, OK, thanks for the great insight. In other words, it's safe to |assume to always restart Tomcat when deploying webapps. That, of |course, is less than ideal. For testing, that just makes the |development time

RE: Redeployment of War over and over Supported?

2004-01-30 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Howdy, We are running Tomcat 5.0.18 w/ jdk 1.4.2 on Linux. We deploy our wars with the catalina deployer and ant. We automate our builds and deployments for every 30 minutes. So, every half an hour we build and deploy our war to tomcat. Out of curiosity, why every half hour? This process

Re: Redeployment of War over and over Supported?

2004-01-30 Thread Seth Ladd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 | | Out of curiosity, why every half hour? Seemed like a good round number. No real reason, we just wanted things current. :) | | So there's a memory leak somewhere. Yes, no doubt. I'm trying to discover if it's my app (very well could be) or Tomcat.

Re: Redeployment of War over and over Supported?

2004-01-30 Thread Philipp Taprogge
Hi! I don't know if this applies to your webapp, but there is an issue with the java compiler having a memory leak which can lead to OOM errors when tomcat has to compile many jsps over and over. A remidy for this is either to use jikes instead of javac entirely or to set the fork attribute

Re: Redeployment of War over and over Supported?

2004-01-30 Thread Seth Ladd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Philipp Taprogge wrote: | Hi! | | I don't know if this applies to your webapp, but there is an issue with | the java compiler having a memory leak which can lead to OOM errors when | tomcat has to compile many jsps over and over. A remidy for this is |

Re: Redeployment of War over and over Supported?

2004-01-30 Thread Josh Rehman
Actually, that's not quite correct. From $CATALINA_HOME/RELEASE_NOTES: JAVAC leaking memory: The Java compiler leaks memory each time a class is compiled. Web applications containing hundreds of JSP files may as a result trigger out of memory errors

Re: Redeployment of War over and over Supported?

2004-01-30 Thread Remy Maucherat
Seth Ladd wrote: Hello, We are running Tomcat 5.0.18 w/ jdk 1.4.2 on Linux. We deploy our wars with the catalina deployer and ant. We automate our builds and deployments for every 30 minutes. So, every half an hour we build and deploy our war to tomcat. This process seems to always force an

Re: Redeployment of War over and over Supported?

2004-01-30 Thread Philipp Taprogge
Hi! Josh Rehman wrote: Note: This issue has been fixed in Sun JDK 1.4.x. Thanks for pointing out. I thought a fix was implemented only recently in the latest java version. My mistake obviously. Phil - To unsubscribe,

Re: Redeployment of War over and over Supported?

2004-01-30 Thread Seth Ladd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 | There are some problems with certain webapps (Struts based webapps in | particular). | http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26135 | | More generally, there's no way to force the VM to discard a classloader, | so I think it is unwise to

Re: Redeployment of War over and over Supported?

2004-01-30 Thread Josh Rehman
Seth Ladd wrote: Wow, OK, thanks for the great insight. In other words, it's safe to assume to always restart Tomcat when deploying webapps. That, of course, is less than ideal. For testing, that just makes the development time longer (and more complicated, since now we have to remember to

Re: Redeployment of War over and over Supported? [T2004013100A1]

2004-01-30 Thread membershipservices
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED], We received your message on 1/30/2004 at 6:51:07 PM Central Standard Time. Thank you for contacting Member Savings. We have received and are reviewing your inquiry. Due to heavy volume, it may take longer than usual for us to get back to you. Messages are being