RE: Tomcat Performance Questions

2003-02-14 Thread Shapira, Yoav
nformatics >-Original Message- >From: Laxmikanth M.S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 9:26 AM >To: Tomcat Users List >Subject: RE: Tomcat Performance Questions > >Hi Shapira, >Is there way to host multiple sites in Tomcat withou

RE: Tomcat Performance Questions

2003-02-14 Thread Laxmikanth M.S.
Hi Shapira, Is there way to host multiple sites in Tomcat without using apache thanks Laxmikanth > -Original Message- > From: Shapira, Yoav [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 7:53 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: Tomcat Perfor

RE: Tomcat Performance Questions

2003-02-14 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Howdy, >Just wanted to find out what the list's experience is with Tomcat versus >Apache ? Why is one preferred over the other ? Depends on your situation. People with lots of static files frequently put Apache in front to handle the static files and delegate servlet/JSP requests to tomcat. I

RE: Tomcat Performance Questions

2001-01-16 Thread Barclay, Tom
> Sorry if I missed it, early on in the thread, but what > servlets etc are you > testing the configurations with? In order to assess the > performance of the > engine, you should be using simple, easily analysed servlets, doing a > minimum of functionality. Say, a snoop servlet, a session servl

RE: Tomcat Performance Questions

2001-01-16 Thread horn_ken
- > From: Stefan Langer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 1:54 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Tomcat Performance Questions > > > One thing the documentation states is that you should use the > AJP13 Protocol which is suppose to be faster.

RE: Tomcat Performance Questions "how was it tested?"

2001-01-15 Thread Barclay, Tom
_jk (given what the docs say about them being faster) are the results we're questioning. > -Original Message- > From: Craig O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 3:28 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Tomcat Performance Q

RE: Tomcat Performance Questions "how was it tested?"

2001-01-15 Thread Craig O'Brien
, Craig -Original Message- From: Barclay, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 12:16 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Tomcat Performance Questions "how was it tested?" Sadly, I don't think it will be much use. We have a heavy duty produ

RE: Tomcat Performance Questions "how was it tested?"

2001-01-15 Thread Barclay, Tom
ts JVM/run-time environment) - much faster than 1.2.2. The results were significantly improved timings. Tomb > -Original Message- > From: G.Nagarajan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 2:14 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Tomcat Performanc

RE: Tomcat Performance Questions "how was it tested?"

2001-01-15 Thread G.Nagarajan
Hi, can you tell how you tested the performance. I would like to apply the benchmark for my machine. Thanks Nagaraj. -Original Message- From: Stefan Langer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 7:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Tomcat Performance Questions

RE: Tomcat Performance Questions

2001-01-15 Thread Barclay, Tom
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 1:54 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Tomcat Performance Questions > > > One thing the documentation states is that you should use the > AJP13 Protocol which is suppose to be faster. That connector > is not configured in the default

RE: Tomcat Performance Questions

2001-01-15 Thread Stefan Langer
One thing the documentation states is that you should use the AJP13 Protocol which is suppose to be faster. That connector is not configured in the default server.xml file. They use AJP12 I have not tested this but you might want to give it a try. Stefan