Re: Mod_jk problems with Apache 1.3.31 Tomcat 4.1.30

2004-07-23 Thread Ruth, Brice
Chris Bland wrote: Hello all, I am having trouble getting the jk connector to work with apache 1.3.31 and tomcat 4.1.30. When I try to go from apache to tomcat I am getting an internal server error. My workers.properties file is very basic worker.list=rei worker.rei.type=ajp13

RE: mod_jk problems - Need help!

2004-05-27 Thread Carl Olivier
Olivier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 May 2004 02:21 PM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: mod_jk problems - Need help! Hey. In reply to my own post: I have now deployed the latest mod_jk2 buiild (2.04) that I compiled to the server mentioned below. The problem has now gone

RE: mod_jk problems - Need help!

2004-05-07 Thread Ralph Einfeldt
I don't think that the problem is caused by the tomcat side. The output looks pretty much like a memory or a disk dump. You normally can't access memory outside of the java process from within tomcat. (Native libraries excluded) So I think it's mod_jk, apache or the jvm that cause this

Re: mod_jk problems - Need help!

2004-05-07 Thread Daniel Gibby
I've heard that if you have 5.0.19 that you really should be using the latest mod_jk2 connector 2.0.4 Carl Olivier wrote: Greetings. Having a problem with mod_jk2 in some instances. Am hoping someone has some sort of feedback as to what could be causing it. Right the scenario: WinXP Pro

RE: mod_jk problems - Need help!

2004-05-07 Thread Carl Olivier
Hey. In reply to my own post: I have now deployed the latest mod_jk2 buiild (2.04) that I compiled to the server mentioned below. The problem has now gone! Unfortunately there is one small problem though - which I detailed in a Bugzilla post:

RE: mod_jk problems on Apache 2.0

2003-02-27 Thread Turner, John
RH 8 ships with Apache 2.0.40, and if you've applied RPM updates to your RH installation, the 2.0.40 is further munged from a standard 2.0.40, as RH has gone and backported all of the security and other fixes between .40 and .44 to their .40 instead of just distributing .44. Depending on where

RE: mod_jk problems, no conf/auto/mod_jk.conf

2002-09-24 Thread Turner, John
You only get a mod_jk.conf file if you have the appropriate Listener elements in server.xml. John -Original Message- From: Nathan Coraor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 3:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mod_jk problems, no conf/auto/mod_jk.conf

RE: mod_jk problems

2002-03-21 Thread Robert Abbate
Thank you! I will try that. I am using Java 1.3 Robert -Original Message- From: Griffith, Patrick, CTR, AFPCA/OAA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:47 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: mod_jk problems I had something similar to this. I could get tomcat

RE: mod_jk problems

2002-03-20 Thread Robert Abbate
Anyone seen anything like this before? [Thu Mar 21 01:54:22 2002] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (228)]: connection_tcp_get_message: Error - jk_tcp_socket_recvfull failed [Thu Mar 21 01:54:22 2002] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (712)]: Error reading reply [Thu Mar 21 01:54:22 2002] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (845)]: In

Re: mod_jk problems

2001-07-26 Thread Jason Koeninger
I've seen this exact problem in 3.3m3, but I don't have any recommendations on working through it right now. ajp12 has been better in this respect than ajp13, but the problem isn't gone. I'm planning to spend some time in August or September working through the mod_jk code to check on a

Re: mod_jk problems

2001-07-26 Thread Aaron Wald
I've seen this problem in 3.3.m4... I just upgraded to 3.3b1 on one box and haven't seen it yet, but haven't tested it as thoroughly. I'm really interested in a work around? In addition to this problem I occasionally get a jsp page that isn't processed returned. I've seen this on two