Re: sealing violation in 4.0m5

2000-12-20 Thread craig mcclanahan
Bill Pfeiffer wrote: > > Classpath is not set (ie set to empty) when starting Tomcat. With Tomcat 4.0 using standard startup scripts, this does not matter -- the user's CLASSPATH variable is totally ignored. My web app > does include some jars, none of which should clash with Tomcat. > My u

Re: sealing violation in 4.0m5

2000-12-20 Thread Stuart Roebuck
EB-INF/class > directory. > > Thanks, > > Bill Pfeiffer > > - Original Message - > From: "Kitching Simon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 6:06 AM > Subject: RE: sealing v

Re: sealing violation in 4.0m5

2000-12-20 Thread Bill Pfeiffer
, Bill Pfeiffer - Original Message - From: "Kitching Simon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 6:06 AM Subject: RE: sealing violation in 4.0m5 > Hi Bill. > > I believe a "sealing violation" is when a class

RE: sealing violation in 4.0m5

2000-12-20 Thread Kitching Simon
Hi Bill. I believe a "sealing violation" is when a class which was loaded under one classloader tries to call a class loaded under a different classloader, in circumstances where this isn't allowed. I suggest that the problem is therefore something to do with classpaths, ie your classpath inclu