Re: RTFM

2004-01-15 Thread Carlos Pereira
no, I'm not returning anything from the servlet. It's not returning anything! You must return after using sendRedirect, otherwise your servlet will continue running. That's probably the problem, as it redirects you to another page, but continues it's execution. Try returning. Carlos Pereira

RE: RTFM

2004-01-15 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Howdy, It is either so glaringly obvious that no one deems an answer worthwhile (RTFM), or so really really difficult, and no one knows how do this. Surely not. Either way I need to know. Don't forget two more options: people don't care to read your message at all, or they read it and don't

RE: RTFM

2004-01-15 Thread Januski, Ken
and let us know if it worked. -Original Message- From: Carlos Pereira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 5:09 AM To: Tomcat Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RTFM no, I'm not returning anything from the servlet. It's not returning anything! You must

RTFM

2004-01-14 Thread Jerald Powel
). It is either so glaringly obvious that no one deems an answer worthwhile (RTFM), or so really really difficult, and no one knows how do this. Surely not. Either way I need to know. A yes or no will suffice, is it possible? If it is, any further direction after that is of course

Re: RTFM

2004-01-14 Thread Oscar Carrillo
/... to http://locahost:8080/app2/... in the same window (IE). It is either so glaringly obvious that no one deems an answer worthwhile (RTFM), or so really really difficult, and no one knows how do this. Surely not. Either way I need to know. A yes or no will suffice, is it possible

AW: RTFM

2004-01-14 Thread SH Solutions
worthwhile (RTFM) Yes or so really really difficult, and no one knows how do this. Surely not. No. have found no doco on this The problem is that you didn't search the right thing. cu Steffen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

RE: RTFM

2004-01-14 Thread Wilson, Allen
Have you tried using JavaScript. The window.location = http://localhost:8080/app2 may work. Allen -Original Message- From: Jerald Powel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 4:11 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RTFM Hi, Now I have your attention

RE: RTFM

2004-01-14 Thread Jerald Powel
JavaScript. The window.location = http://localhost:8080/app2 may work. Allen -Original Message- From: Jerald Powel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 4:11 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RTFM Hi, Now I have your attention, will someone tell me

RE: RTFM

2004-01-14 Thread Keshav Sarin
List Subject: RTFM Hi, Now I have your attention, will someone tell me if it is possible to forward control (either by JSP or Servlet) from one context to another, in the same browser window? i.e: forward from http://locahost:8080/app1/... to http://locahost:8080/app2/... in the same window

RE: RTFM

2004-01-14 Thread Jerald Powel
List Subject: RTFM Hi, Now I have your attention, will someone tell me if it is possible to forward control (either by JSP or Servlet) from one context to another, in the same browser window? i.e: forward from http://locahost:8080/app1/... to http://locahost:8080/app2/... in the same window

RE: RTFM

2004-01-14 Thread George Sexton
I generally don't think it is required to resort to things like this to get our attention. -Original Message- From: Jerald Powel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 3:11 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RTFM Hi, Now I have your attention

RE: RTFM

2004-01-14 Thread Jerald Powel
: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 3:11 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RTFM Hi, Now I have your attention, will someone tell me if it is possible to forward control (either by JSP or Servlet) from one context to another, in the same browser window? i.e: forward from http://locahost:8080/app1

RE: RTFM

2004-01-14 Thread George Sexton
PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 5:33 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: RTFM in traditional fashion, the subject was related to the contents of body of the email. George Sexton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I generally don't think it is required to resort to things like this to get our

RE: RTFM

2004-01-14 Thread Jerald Powel
] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 5:33 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: RTFM in traditional fashion, the subject was related to the contents of body of the email. George Sexton wrote:I generally don't think it is required to resort to things like this to get our attention. -Original

RE: RTFM

2004-01-14 Thread Justin Ruthenbeck
interest and to work to prioritize your request for help. -Original Message- From: Jerald Powel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 5:33 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: RTFM in traditional fashion, the subject was related to the contents of body of the email

RE: RTFM

2004-01-14 Thread Jerald Powel
request for help. -Original Message- From: Jerald Powel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 5:33 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: RTFM in traditional fashion, the subject was related to the contents of body of the email. George Sexton wrote:I generally don't

Re: RTFM

2004-01-14 Thread Jerry Ford
: Jerald Powel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 5:33 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: RTFM in traditional fashion, the subject was related to the contents of body of the email. George Sexton wrote:I generally don't think it is required to resort to things like

Re: RTFM

2004-01-14 Thread Apu Shah
, January 14, 2004 5:33 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: RTFM in traditional fashion, the subject was related to the contents of bodyof the email. George Sexton wrote:I generally don't think it is required to resort to things like this to get our attention. -Original Message

Re: RTFM

2004-01-14 Thread Ben Souther
List Subject: RE: RTFM in traditional fashion, the subject was related to the contents of bodyof the email. George Sexton wrote:I generally don't think it is required to resort to things like this to get our attention. -Original Message- From: Jerald Powel

Re: RTFM

2004-01-14 Thread Apu Shah
, January 14, 2004 5:33 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: RTFM in traditional fashion, the subject was related to the contents of bodyof the email. George Sexton wrote:I generally don't think it is required to resort to things like this to get our

Re: RTFM

2004-01-14 Thread Ben Souther
List Subject: RE: RTFM in traditional fashion, the subject was related to the contents of bodyof the email. George Sexton wrote:I generally don't think it is required to resort to things like this to get our attention. -Original Message- From: Jerald Powel

Re: RTFM

2004-01-14 Thread Jerald Powel
To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: RTFM in traditional fashion, the subject was related to the contents of body of the email. George Sexton wrote:I generally don't think it is required to resort to things like this to get our attention. -Original Message- From: Jerald Powel [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: RTFM and Ettiquette was: MY ATTITUDE

2003-02-17 Thread Erik Price
Paul Brinkley wrote: The solution that causes the least amount of distress to all parties (that I can think of) is to teach netiquette to Internet newcomers in some hard-to-avoid location. [...] Unfortunately, this is a culture change, and hence it will take a while, possibly as much as a

Re: RTFM and Ettiquette was: MY ATTITUDE

2003-02-14 Thread Paul Brinkley
someone asks a question that is answered in some docs, a useful answer would be something like: You'll find the web.xml format explained in Sun's Servlet 2.3 spec, available at java.sun.com Replying Yo, just, RTFM is rude and not helpful to anyone. I'm pretty new to Tomcat as well and appreciate

RTFM and Ettiquette was: MY ATTITUDE

2003-02-13 Thread Jeff Wishnie
, a useful answer would be something like: You'll find the web.xml format explained in Sun's Servlet 2.3 spec, available at java.sun.com Replying Yo, just, RTFM is rude and not helpful to anyone. I'm pretty new to Tomcat as well and appreciate being pointed to the place where I can find

Re: Tomcat behind apache - probabaly a FAQ but I *did* RTFM :)

2001-10-03 Thread Peter Schuller
The interface between Apache and Tomcat is provided by mod_webapp.so. Have a look through the archives and check the Tomcat pages on http://jakarta.apache.org. The configuration of virtual domains happens in Apache and mod_webapp.so automatically configures Tomcat. Thanks! Will do. /

RE: ...is not a servlet, yes I *have* RTFM, my jre/lib/ext is empty! -- fixed

2001-10-02 Thread Peter Ferne
FYI I fixed it by recompiling against the new jars. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 September 2001 14:48 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ...is not a servlet, yes I *have* RTFM, my jre/lib/ext is empty! Also, check to make sure

RTFM?

2001-05-15 Thread Sachin Phatak
RTFM - I've seen this abbr. in use. What does it stand for? Sachin PS. I can see a few sniggering faces but how's a guy to know if he doen't ask?

Re: RTFM?

2001-05-15 Thread Gnanasekaran Thoppae
RTFM - Read The Friendly Manual! -gnana Sachin Phatak wrote: RTFM - I've seen this abbr. in use. What does it stand for? Sachin PS. I can see a few sniggering faces but how's a guy to know if he doen't ask?

AW: RTFM?

2001-05-15 Thread Egger Lothar
RTFM :) Read The Fucking Manual (slang, Usenet, IRC) look at: http://www.io.com/docs/vera.html lothar -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Sachin Phatak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. Mai 2001 13:08 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: RTFM? RTFM - I've seen

RE: RTFM?

2001-05-15 Thread Ramsay Domloge
- From: Sachin Phatak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 May 2001 12:08 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RTFM? RTFM - I've seen this abbr. in use. What does it stand for? Sachin PS. I can see a few sniggering faces but how's a guy to know if he doen't ask?

Re: RTFM?

2001-05-15 Thread rday
Read The F'ing Manual Roger

RE: RTFM?

2001-05-15 Thread William Kaufman
: RTFM? RTFM - I've seen this abbr. in use. What does it stand for? Sachin PS. I can see a few sniggering faces but how's a guy to know if he doen't ask?