Re: 64k limit on POST variables?

2002-01-30 Thread David Cassidy
64k ??? are you uploading files ? D Kirby Vandivort wrote: I have some forms set up that can accept a rather large amount of data, and I'm finding that my data is getting truncated after 64k. What is causing this limitation? I can't find anything on the web about POST variables being

Re: 64k limit on POST variables?

2002-01-30 Thread Joel Rees
Isn't this is a browser limit? Joel Alps Giken Kansai Kaihatsubu Suita, Osaka Kirby Vandivort queried: I have some forms set up that can accept a rather large amount of data, and I'm finding that my data is getting truncated after 64k. What is causing this limitation? I can't find

Re: 64k limit on POST variables?

2002-01-30 Thread Lars Andersen
I have some forms set up that can accept a rather large amount of data, and I'm finding that my data is getting truncated after 64k. What is causing this limitation? I can't find anything on the web about POST variables being limited by the SPEC. Is this a tomcat thing? and is there any

RE: 64k limit on POST variables?

2002-01-30 Thread Justin Rowles
AFAIK there is no limitation in apache. I don't think that there is a limitation in tomcat or one of the connectors. Given that you could make a Denial Of Service attack by using memory by posting arbitrarily long parameters to a server, I suspect that all of them have some kind of

Re: TC Re: 64k limit on POST variables?

2002-01-30 Thread Kirby Vandivort
I figured out my problem (and I'm ashamed to admit it on the list). In my case, I wasn't checking the variable on the server at the right point. Tomcat was sending 64k just fine (I discovered after adding a decent amount of debugging). I happened to be putting the result in a database column

RE: TC Re: 64k limit on POST variables?

2002-01-30 Thread Justin Rowles
In my case, I wasn't checking the variable on the server at the right point. Tomcat was sending 64k just fine (I discovered after adding a decent amount of debugging). I happened to be putting the result in a database column that was limited to 64k. Hence the reason that I ran into the