Re: jsp compile - default constructor

2004-03-29 Thread Tim Funk
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26444 It won't be fixed. You'll need to send an email to the jsp feedback group to address this. (The email is on the cover page of the spec) -Tim Antonio Fiol Bonnín wrote: I don't agree or disagree. But this will break many apps. Mine for exa

Re: jsp compile - default constructor

2004-03-28 Thread Antonio Fiol Bonnín
I don't agree or disagree. But this will break many apps. Mine for example. Couldn't that be detected at jsp->java time? I believe that would not hurt that much. In fact... (not having read the spec) ...what's the whole point of creating the object at that time? IMHO, if it doesn't exist, just

Re: jsp compile - default constructor

2004-03-28 Thread Rupert Jones
Tim I realise the spec says it's ok to use new, however it's a fairly restrictive implementation. In fact it means that you can only pass objects through to the JSP page that have an empty constructor. It is no longer 'all objects'. Is the performance hit of using reflection 'that much'? Chee

Re: Re: jsp compile - default constructor

2004-03-28 Thread info
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren Wir haben Ihre Nachricht dankend erhalten und werden diese so schnell wie möglich bearbeiten. Mit "internetten" Grüssen Ihr Shoppingcity.ch-Team - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For a

Re: jsp compile - default constructor

2004-03-28 Thread Tim Funk
The spec says using new() is OK. So tomcat does since it is *much* faster than reflection. -Tim Rupert Jones wrote: Hi there [Running Tomcat 5.0.19] I have a servlet which forwards a Boolean object resource (request.setAttribute("someBoolean", someBoolean);) on to a jsp page. As you know the