On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 04:02, Felipe Schnack wrote:
I don't know, to me seems a good idea to pool tag instances. For people
like me, that don't write a single line os scriptlet code, millions of tags
are created and destroyed... seems to me that we are freeing a lot of
work from gc... gc is
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 17:08, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
JSP 2.0 also introduces a new tag API called SimpleTag. Besides being
much easier to program, you don't need to worry about pooling and reuse of
them; they are created as needed by the container.
I'm glad to hear that. That is a more
The current wisdom on object pooling is don't do it, with the
exception of expensive objects like database connections, etc. Right
now, jsp uses object pooling of tag objects, in theory to attain higher
performance. This might have made sense back in the old days, but now
must Tag objects
I am guessing you are referring to custom tags? Do you have a link to
more information about this because I am new to custom tags and have
never heard of this before. Of course I would want to write my tags the
right way, whichever way that is...
Erik
Joe Tomcat wrote:
The current wisdom
The current wisdom on object pooling is don't do it, with the
exception of expensive objects like database connections, etc. Right
now, jsp uses object pooling of tag objects, in theory to attain higher
performance. This might have made sense back in the old days, but now
must Tag objects are
On 21 Jan 2003, Joe Tomcat wrote:
Date: 21 Jan 2003 05:46:53 -0800
From: Joe Tomcat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tag object reuse (pooling) in jsp 2.0?
The current wisdom on object pooling is don't do
