[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks for all the replies
On 9/30/05, Caldarale, Charles R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Peddireddy Srikanth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tomcat Alone or tomcat+IIS/Apache
And they argue that as Tomcat it self runs inside a JVM, which inturn
From: Gregg D Bolinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tomcat Alone or tomcat+IIS/Apache
Does Tomcat support CGI bins
utalizing non-java technology?
As usual, RTFM:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.5-doc/cgi-howto.html
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL
a misunderstanding??
thanx for any kind of info in this regard.
Regards
Srikanth
On 9/20/05, Caldarale, Charles R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Gregg D Bolinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tomcat Alone or tomcat+IIS/Apache
I know that delivering static content with Apache/IIS is
preferred
Peddireddy Srikanth wrote:
And they argue that as Tomcat it self runs inside a JVM, which inturn
is a single process all the threads etc wil be simulted ones (and not
the native threads) and hence it will not scale up well under high
loads.
Is this argument a valid one or just a
We had the same discussion a year ago, as we switched to tomcat 5 and
was testing whether we do need apache in front of it. Actually the
only advantage for this solution left were apache mods like
url-rewriting -
http://mydomain - http://mydomain/myapp/mypath - better for some
search engines and
From: Peddireddy Srikanth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tomcat Alone or tomcat+IIS/Apache
And they argue that as Tomcat it self runs inside a JVM, which inturn
is a single process all the threads etc wil be simulted ones (and not
the native threads) and hence it will not scale up
thanks for all the replies
On 9/30/05, Caldarale, Charles R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Peddireddy Srikanth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tomcat Alone or tomcat+IIS/Apache
And they argue that as Tomcat it self runs inside a JVM, which inturn
is a single process all
I am just curious. I know that delivering static content with Apache/IIS is
preferred. But does that matter if every single request has to go to Tomcat
because the data is dynamic? Is there some caching that gets involved here?
What is the benefit of Tomcat + Apache/IIS on major J2EE apps?
Well I'm sure you can imagine that if all of your content is dynamic then
layering tomcat behind Apache/IIS will only add latency/resources to your
requests... nothing significant.. but maybe if your serving up a ton of
requests it might be worthwhile to run tomcat standalone.
-David
Quoting
From: Gregg D Bolinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tomcat Alone or tomcat+IIS/Apache
I know that delivering static content with Apache/IIS is
preferred.
Urban myth, based primarily on older Tomcat versions that did not
perform anywhere near as well as the current one.
But does
10 matches
Mail list logo