RE: AJP12 to AJP13

2002-03-08 Thread Ion Larranaga
original- De: Lance Dyas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: viernes, 08 de marzo de 2002 4:55 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: AJP12 to AJP13 I have a web app that is configured on ajp12, Is there anything I need to change in the app itself to get it to run on ajp13... or is it just

AJP12 to AJP13

2002-03-07 Thread Lance Dyas
I have a web app that is configured on ajp12, Is there anything I need to change in the app itself to get it to run on ajp13... or is it just a question of changing tomcat configurations I was specifically wondering I could get it to work with SSL hence the interest in ajp13 A few

AJP12 or AJP13?

2001-06-18 Thread wen
Hi, I am new to tomcat. I am not sure which protocol should be set in my server.xml, AJP12 or AJP13? How to know which protocol is supported in my box? My platform is GNU/Linux Debian(unstable) and apache 1.3.19 tomcat 3.2.2 libapache-mod-j k3.2.2 Thanks so much in advance. Regards, --Wen

Re: AJP12 or AJP13?

2001-06-18 Thread Neil Conway
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 10:27:05AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am new to tomcat. I am not sure which protocol should be set in my server.xml, AJP12 or AJP13? How to know which protocol is supported in my box? You need AJP12 to shutdown Apache/Tomcat, but AJP13 is the better protocol

Re: AJP12 or AJP13?

2001-06-18 Thread Monitor
Hello all, Where can I find the information/definition of APJ12/APJ13? Many thanks. Monitor __ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Webmail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/

RE: AJP12 or AJP13?

2001-06-18 Thread Alexander Demidovich
But be careful.. AJP13 doesn't pass any extensions to http protocol, for example - webdav -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 3:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AJP12 or AJP13? Hi, I am new to tomcat. I am

Ajp12 vs Ajp13

2001-05-30 Thread Andy C
I'm confused. When editing the server.xml file to use Ajp13 support should I delete the AJP12 support or leave it in? Is there a way to find out which Ajp is running on my server? I.E should my server.xml be: Connector className=org.apache.tomcat.service.PoolTcpConnector

Re: Ajp12 vs Ajp13

2001-05-30 Thread Tim O'Neil
At 04:37 PM 5/30/2001 +0100, you wrote: I'm confused. When editing the server.xml file to use Ajp13 support should I delete the AJP12 support or leave it in? You have to leave ajp12 in because tomcat uses it in its wind down procedure, at least in 3.x versions. You can run everything else on 13

Re: Ajp12 vs Ajp13

2001-05-30 Thread Jim Jagielski
Tim O'Neil wrote: At 04:37 PM 5/30/2001 +0100, you wrote: I'm confused. When editing the server.xml file to use Ajp13 support should I delete the AJP12 support or leave it in? You have to leave ajp12 in because tomcat uses it in its wind down procedure, at least in 3.x versions. You

Re: Ajp12 vs Ajp13

2001-05-30 Thread Tim O'Neil
At 02:19 PM 5/30/2001 -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: I'm considering a patch to allow ajp13 to handle the wind-down as well. Security-wise, it's much better for ajp13 to be able to do it, but StopTomcat.java has ajp12 hardwired So Jim- in 4.0 and beyond setting p13 to that task wasn't in the

Re: Ajp12 vs Ajp13

2001-05-30 Thread Jim Jagielski
Scratching an itch... I've heard a number of resistant movements in wider TC acceptance due to the fact that the shutdown procedure is as open as it is, even using the 'inet' hack to ensure a local command. Tim O'Neil wrote: At 02:19 PM 5/30/2001 -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: I'm considering a

Performance of AJP12 vs. AJP13

2001-04-10 Thread Tom Mahaffey
, but did not come across using AJP12 instead of AJP13. In addition to a increased rate of requests per second, my application server hardware also seems to be spending less cycles on individual httpd processes as well as the Java process which owns the running Tomcat. Particulars: + Solaris

Re: Performance of AJP12 vs. AJP13

2001-04-10 Thread Jeff Kilbride
Yeah, it surprises me a little. All the docs say ajp13 is faster due to it's connection re-use. I tested mod_jserv (ajp12) against mod_jk (ajp13) in my own tests and found mod_jk to be about 40% faster. It also scaled more smoothly and handled the load less erratically. I was doing simple

Re: Performance of AJP12 vs. AJP13

2001-04-10 Thread Tom Mahaffey
) against mod_jk (ajp13) in my own tests and found mod_jk to be about 40% faster. It also scaled more smoothly and handled the load less erratically. I was doing simple inserts into a MySQL database from my servlet. However, I didn't test mod_jk (ajp12) vs. mod_jk (ajp13). I might have to go back

ajp12 vs ajp13 for Tomcat 3.2.1

2001-03-28 Thread Peter Dai
Could someone please clarify the following for me? Besides SSL via JSSE, what else do I lose if I use ajp12 instead of ajp13? (ajp13 is supposed to be faster, right?). The reason that I would like to stay with ajp12 is ajp13 can not handle POST with object. Thanks, Peter

RE: ajp12 or ajp13

2001-03-01 Thread Chris Andreou
should make chages in mod_jk.conf file (which is included in Apache http.conf). Then add new connector for apjv13 in server.xml file (look at dokumentation in mod_jk section). Tomasz Sucharzewski ING Bank Reply Separator Subject:ajp12 or ajp13 Author

ajp12 or ajp13

2001-02-28 Thread Wang, Jianming
Hello, I have configed Apache to work with Tomcat. However, in the mod_jk.conf-auto file, it still uses JkMount /example/servlet/* ajp12, even I already configed Apache to use ajp13. Why tomcat still use ajp12? Could you please give me a help? Thank you in advance. Jianming Wang

Re: ajp12 or ajp13

2001-02-28 Thread Jan Labanowski
You do not edit mod_jk.conf-auto. It does not make sense, since it is always overwritten by tomcat when it starts. What you do is: 1) you copy the mod_jk.conf-auto to mod_jk.conf-my-own-file 2) in the Apache's httpd.conf you put the line: Include

Re: Aliases/Rewrites (was: ajp12 vs ajp13 mod_jk.conf-auto

2001-02-16 Thread Mel Martinez
--- Jan Labanowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is my (and others) experience that mod_jk has to be loaded BEFORE mod_rewrite for it to act responsibly. In your case the mod_rewrite is linked statically, i.e., loaded before mod_jk. I would suggest to make both mod_jk and mod_rewrite DSO,

Aliases/Rewrites (was: ajp12 vs ajp13 mod_jk.conf-auto

2001-02-15 Thread Mel Martinez
Filip, --- Filip Hanik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now, if I could just get someone to tell me why apache Alias and Rewrites are not working with tomcat... tell us what you are trying to do and send us some sample config files and how your environment is setup. is becomes much easier

Re: Aliases/Rewrites (was: ajp12 vs ajp13 mod_jk.conf-auto

2001-02-15 Thread Jan Labanowski
It is my (and others) experience that mod_jk has to be loaded BEFORE mod_rewrite for it to act responsibly. In your case the mod_rewrite is linked statically, i.e., loaded before mod_jk. I would suggest to make both mod_jk and mod_rewrite DSO, and load/add module mod_jk before mod_rewrite.

RE: ajp12 vs ajp13 mod_jk.conf-auto

2001-02-14 Thread Coetmeur, Alain
-Message d'origine- De: Mel Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Date: mardi 13 fvrier 2001 23:33 : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet: ajp12 vs ajp13 mod_jk.conf-auto Question: what determines whether ajp12 or ajp13 will be specified for a jkmount statement in the auto-generated

ajp12 vs ajp13 mod_jk.conf-auto

2001-02-13 Thread Mel Martinez
Question: what determines whether ajp12 or ajp13 will be specified for a jkmount statement in the auto-generated mod_jk.conf-auto file? I.E., it always generates statements like: JkMount /myapp/servlet/* ajp12 JkMount /myapp/*.jsp ajp12 I've even tried disabling all reference to ajp12 from

Re: ajp12 vs ajp13 mod_jk.conf-auto

2001-02-13 Thread Filip Hanik
ect [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.filip.net - Original Message - From: "Mel Martinez" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 2:32 PM Subject: ajp12 vs ajp13 mod_jk.conf-auto Question: what determines whether ajp12 or ajp13 will be specified for

Re: ajp12 vs ajp13 mod_jk.conf-auto

2001-02-13 Thread Mel Martinez
al Message - From: "Mel Martinez" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 2:32 PM Subject: ajp12 vs ajp13 mod_jk.conf-auto Question: what determines whether ajp12 or ajp13 will be specified for a jkmount statement in the auto-genera

Re: ajp12 vs ajp13 mod_jk.conf-auto

2001-02-13 Thread Filip Hanik
well for me :) Filip ~ Namaste - I bow to the divine in you ~ Filip Hanik Software Architect [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.filip.net - Original Message - From: "Mel Martinez" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 3:11 PM Subject: Re: ajp12 vs ajp13 m