Hello All,
Can someone put me out of my misery? I have attempted to build the
mod_jk.so for Apache 1.3.33 on HP-UX 11.11 multiple times and failing
miserable. I have tried with multiple versions of the src but they ALL
continue to fail on line 22 of the apache13/Makefile referencing
From: Gibson, Danny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can someone put me out of my misery? I have attempted to build the
mod_jk.so for Apache 1.3.33 on HP-UX 11.11 multiple times and failing
miserable.
I don't think we've ever had to compile it, it just comes with the
Apache/Tomcat distribution from HP. I'm
have you got the Gnu versions of all the tools, ie gcc, make etc?
-Original Message-
From: Gibson, Danny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 November 2004 18:01
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11.11
Hello All,
Can someone put me out of my misery? I have attempted
Apache 1.3.33 from source with no compiler or make issues. It's
just this JK connector build I am having extreme trouble with...
I may have to remove the Apache 2 and try installing an HP-UX depot of
Apache 1.3 in hopes I can get the mod_jk.so library file.
I was just hoping someone already had
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. I moved mod_jk.so to that directory and it said mod_jk.so compiled
correctly.
Why do you think that mod_jk.so was compiled correctly?
I suppose that these strings indicate the opposite:
ld: 0711-244 ERROR: No csects or exported symbols have been saved
:
---
Listener className=org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.config.ApacheConfig
modJk=/usr/local/apache/modules/mod_jk.so /
and
Listener className=org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.config.ApacheConfig append=true
forwardAll=false modJk=/usr/local/apache/modules/mod_jk.so /
in httpd.conf
-
u
Major problems.. can't get this to work. Do I need to switch apache
versions???
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 4:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Apache 1.3 not loading Mod_Jk.so
All,
If anyone can help me I
, July 16, 2004 9:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Apache 1.3 not loading Mod_Jk.so
Major problems.. can't get this to work. Do I need to switch apache
versions???
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 4:09 PM
To: [EMAIL
Anyone have any ideas on this ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 4:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Apache 1.3 not loading Mod_Jk.so
All,
If anyone can help me I would be forever grateful, I have spent hours
What is there in line 202 of httpd.conf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 2:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Apache 1.3 not loading Mod_Jk.so
Anyone have any ideas on this ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Line 202 is where I reference the mod_jk.so
LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk.so
-Original Message-
From: Anup Ray, Unix Systems Administrator
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 1:31 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Apache 1.3 not loading Mod_Jk.so
Did you move the mod_jk.so file into $APACHE_HOME/libexec? Did the compile
work properly? Are you sure that the mod_jk.so is really the apache module
and not something else (there's a way to determine this but I can't remember
how)?
--mikej
-=-
mike jackson
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Yes.I moved mod_jk.so to that directory and it said mod_jk.so compiled
correctly.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 3:27 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Apache 1.3 not loading Mod_Jk.so
Did you move the mod_jk.so file
All,
If anyone can help me I would be forever grateful, I have spent hours
on this problem. I am installing Apache 1.3 and Tomcat 4.0 on AIX. Apache
installs great and tomcat installs great. I am trying to build mod_jk.so
from jk-1.2.5. The mod_jk.so builds, but my htttpd.conf and apache
and Public running and can
access both by; Author = http://localhost:8081 Public =
http://localhost:8082.
The Public is instance I want to serve via Apache2 from my home server.
I'm trying to understand if
I have to utilize the mod_jk.so and virtual hosting elements of Apache2
and Tomcat and which
4:06 PM
Subject: Apache2 and mod_jk.so
I've currently have a CMS called Magnolia installed. Magnolia 1.1
comes with Tomcat 4.0 and installs Tomcat during the Magnolia
installation. Magnolia consists of two instances: Author (for Admin)
and Public.
I'm using Mac OS X (Panther
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 06:05:19PM -0500, QM wrote:
Check your httpd.conf syntax: I forget the exact directive, but you must
specify *two* lines to load a module in Apache 1.x; just LoadModule
isn't enough.
Check other modules loaded in httpd.conf as a reference. You'll have
a block of
Good day All,
Below are my configurations and versions. The problem I have is that when I
try to load the mod_jk.so, it appears to load but fails with the following
error message when starting Apache:
/opt/app/apache1.3.31/bin]
./apachectl start
Syntax error on line 654 of /opt/app
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 05:44:19PM -0500, Gibson, Danny wrote:
: Syntax error on line 654 of /opt/app/apache1.3.31/conf/httpd.conf:
: Invalid command 'JkMount', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a module not
: included in the server configuration
: ./apachectl start: httpd could not be started
I've been trying to find a mod_jk.so binary to connect Apache 2.0.48 to Tomcat 4.1.29
on my AMD64 server, which is running Fedora Core 1 x86_64. I've noticed that FreeBSD
has a 64 bit version, any idea if someone is working on one for Fedora?
Cheers,
Brad
: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64
I've been trying to find a mod_jk.so binary to connect Apache 2.0.48 to
Tomcat 4.1.29 on my AMD64 server, which is running Fedora Core 1 x86_64.
I've noticed that FreeBSD has a 64 bit version, any idea if someone is
working on one for Fedora?
Cheers,
Brad
http://apache.is.co.za/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk2/binaries/linux/
here is the link
-Original Message-
From: Lohan Spies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 4:28 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64
There is an already
Are you telling me that the i386 version will work on a 64bit processor?
-Brad
- Original Message -
From: Lohan Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 8:28 AM
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64
http
Sorry didn't see you were using 64 bit.
Just saw tomcat and fedora!
I don't know give it a bash
-Original Message-
From: Brad Hafichuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 4:43 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64
Are you telling
btw, I did try the i386 version without any luck.
Anyone else know of any solution...
-Brad
- Original Message -
From: Lohan Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 8:55 AM
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64
Sorry
Hello,
I have gotten mod_jk2.so working with my apache2 and tomcat 4
With the mod_jk I had some directives in my httpd.conf
JkLogFile /usr2/wwwlogs/mod_jk_4.log
JkLogLevelerror
It appears that I need to put directives in my
worker2.properties
For the life of me I can not find anywhere
Does any one recognize these?
Built:
Cannot load /usr/local/stow/apache/lib/mod_jk.so into server: dlopen:
/usr/local/stow/apache/lib/mod_jk.so: symbol map_alloc unresolved
Binary:
Cannot load /usr/local/stow/apache/lib/mod_jk.so into server: dlopen:
/usr/local/stow/apache/lib/mod_jk.so
Does any one recognize these?
Built:
Cannot load /usr/local/stow/apache/lib/mod_jk.so into server: dlopen:
/usr/local/stow/apache/lib/mod_jk.so: symbol map_alloc unresolved
Binary:
Cannot load /usr/local/stow/apache/lib/mod_jk.so into server: dlopen:
/usr/local/stow/apache/lib/mod_jk.so
...?
hth,
Adrian Lanning
- Original Message -
From: Sullivan, Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 2:05 PM
Subject: Mod_jk.so on Compaq Tru64
Does any one recognize these?
Built:
Cannot load /usr/local/stow/apache/lib/mod_jk.so into server
Thomas Cherry wrote:
I was expecting to have a mod_jk.so file (which made me question why ant was
the build tool) but have not found it.
I had this same problem on Solaris. I finally found that it couldn't
generate a mod_jk2.so (dynamic library), only a static one (mod_jk2.a)
because Apache
while building apache use ./configure
--enable-so option to make apache accept
shared libraries..
u can also make change to httpd.conf
file(i suppose,not sure) where u have a entry
for like Shared library=no..make that
to yes..and then make mod_jk.so
Pavan Kumar
Tata Consultancy Services
because it
uses a different libc.
Does anyone know how i can locate the source of this problem?
--
J
On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 09:54, OUTTERS Guillaume wrote:
Thomas Cherry wrote:
I was expecting to have a mod_jk.so file (which made me question why ant was
the build tool) but have not found
that to yes..and then make mod_jk.so
Pavan Kumar
Tata Consultancy Services
DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this message is intended only and solely for
the addressed individual or entity indicated in this message and for the exclusive use
of the said addressed individual or entity
change the option
# Whether or not to build shared libraries.
build_libtool_libs=no
in apache/build/libtool
to
# Whether or not to build shared libraries.
build_libtool_libs=yes
this worked for me...
Pavan Kumar
Tata Consultancy Services
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website:
Ok, good news, i copied the libtool(v 1.5) from the jk/native2 over the
apache version(1.4.3), did a new clean make, and the .so was generated.
--
Joost
On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 10:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
change the option
# Whether or not to build shared libraries.
build_libtool_libs=no
?
--
Fear is the path to the Dark Side. Fear leads to anger, anger leads to
hate, hate leads to suffering-- Yoda, Jedi Master
On Jan 29, 2004, at 3:54 AM, OUTTERS Guillaume wrote:
Thomas Cherry wrote:
I was expecting to have a mod_jk.so file (which made me question why
ant was the build tool
to httpd.conf file(i suppose,not sure) where u
have a entry
for like Shared library=no..make that to yes..and then make mod_jk.so
Pavan Kumar
Tata Consultancy Services
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website:
http://
www.tcs.comInterScan_Disclaimer.txt
fine. I can't copy the binaries to the stable system because
it
uses a different libc.
Does anyone know how i can locate the source of this problem?
--
J
On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 09:54, OUTTERS Guillaume wrote:
Thomas Cherry wrote:
I was expecting to have a mod_jk.so file (which made me question
Is in not possible to use mod_jk.so files compiled by other people? I
just want to know why it's so hard to find a binary.
--
Don't underestimate the Force. - Darth Vader, Sith Lord.
On Jan 29, 2004, at 6:05 AM, Joost Veldkamp wrote:
Ok, good news, i copied the libtool(v 1.5) from the jk
What is your OS and Apache versions ?
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Cherry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: How do I build mod_jk.so
Is in not possible to use mod_jk.so files compiled by other people
Subject: Re: How do I build mod_jk.so
Is in not possible to use mod_jk.so files compiled by other people? I
just want to know why it's so hard to find a binary.
--
Don't underestimate the Force. - Darth Vader, Sith Lord.
On Jan 29, 2004, at 6:05 AM, Joost Veldkamp wrote:
Ok, good news, i copied
Thomas Cherry wrote:
but this script does exist. I know it exists, because I had to fix it
(was pointing to a bad path).
Do all the intermediate links have executable bit set (the configure
script tests it)?
Why do I care if the lib is static or not? Recompiling Apache sounds
like a lot
My system came with apache installed, so I don't think I have an apache
directory, but I do have /etc/httpd/lib which points to /usr/lib. This
directory does not have the files you indicated.
Why would anyone have static libraries if they are so limiting? What
advantage do they have, Faster
]
To
Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Re: How do I build mod_jk.so
How can I tell if apache is already compiled with
this option?
--
It is pointless to resist. - Darth Vader, Sith Lord
On Jan 29, 2004, at 4:10 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
while building apache use
to compile the project but now I don't know what to do. I was
expecting to have a mod_jk.so file (which made me question why ant was
the build tool) but have not found it. Could someone tell me what I
have done wrong. All I want to do is connect Apache and Tomcat and at
ever step of the process I
that help
./Lukas
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Cherry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 3:04 AM
Subject: How do I build mod_jk.so
OK, first of all I tried to download mod_jk for linux and I could not
find it. Maybe it exists, but I have
Please respond to
Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
Tomcat Users List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Re: How do I build mod_jk.so
Hello,
To build the connector go into the directory jk/native2/ then do
./buildconf.sh (or something like that, can't recall the exact name
Okay - I'm on a MAC OSX machine and I've got apache and tomcat-5.0.12
both installed and working standalone.
Apache was from source, tomcat from a binary.
I'm now trying to build the mod_jk.so so that apache can speak to
tomcat.
I've been following the instructions at
http://www.geektimes.com
:
Okay - I'm on a MAC OSX machine and I've got apache and tomcat-5.0.12
both installed and working standalone.
Apache was from source, tomcat from a binary.
I'm now trying to build the mod_jk.so so that apache can speak to
tomcat.
I've been following the instructions at
[...]
--
H U M P H
hello,
I have spent two days tried t o build the mod_jk.so for Apache/2.0.40
jakarta-tomcat-4.0.4 on redhat 8
if someone has a binary mod_jk.so for this config , i would REALLY
REALLY appreciate it
Thanks
Hi All,
I am unable to create mod_jk.so with
jakarta-tomcat-connectors-4.1.27 and Apache 2.0.47.
In the last few lines it is throwing some errors. But I do not
what I missed.
My Environment:
---
Red Hat Linux 7.2; JDK - 1.4.0
What I did:
--
1. Installed Apache 2.0.47
There is an extra ';' on one line, that some compilers don't like. It's at
or near the line number given, so just edit the file and delete it.
Satya Narayan Dash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All,
I am unable to create mod_jk.so with
jakarta-tomcat-connectors
I have Solaris 8 (Sparc) Apache 3.1.27 Tomcat 4.1.24, and I downloaded
severals mod_jk, some from the jakarta site:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v
1.2.0/bin/solaris8/
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1
Hello,
can anybody send me the mod_jk for these configuration??
If not, can anybody send me a how to how i can compile mod_jk self?
Many Thanx
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
-connectors-jk-1.2.4-src.tar.
5. Changed into the jk/native directory
6. ./buildconf.sh (no errors)
7. ./configure --with-apxs=/software/web/apache/bin/apxs (no errors)
8. make (no errors)
This leaves me with a mod_jk.so file in the apache-1.3 directory, which
I copy into my APACHE_HOME/libexec directory
)
This leaves me with a mod_jk.so file in the apache-1.3 directory, which
I copy into my APACHE_HOME/libexec directory.
When I try to start apache I get the following error (I've replaced the
full path with APACHE_HOME to make it easier to read):
Syntax error on line 206 of APACHE_HOME/conf/httpd.conf
Cannot
I've managed to solve it. I needed to set an environment variable as follows:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jørgen Nørgaard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 2:28 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Building mod_jk.so
Hi,
I try to connect tomcat 4.1.24 to an existing Apache 1.3 installation
(Solaris 8).
To do so I read I need mod_jk.so and I found a download page
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk2/release/v2.0.2/bin/solaris8/
but below it says to get
* mod_jk2-1.3-eapi.so
If you are looking for mod_jk.so for Solaris 8, you will have to go all the
way back to November 2002:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-
connectors/jk/release/v1.2.1/bin/solaris8/
or else build your own from source.
John
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 12:24:45 +0200, Astrid Wagner
environment variable to use compiler optimizing (bash syntax)
export CFLAGS=-O2
./configure --with-apxs=/path/to/apache/bin/apxs
#optional - needed for Apache with mod_ssl
--enable-EAPI
make
cp ./apache-1.3/mod_jk.so /path/to/apache/libexec/
At 12:24 17.07.2003 +0200, you wrote:
Hi,
I try to connect
can someone remind me how to do this under unix? thanks.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I don't know if there is an official way but I did a
'strings mod_jk2.so'
and found:
mod_jk2/2.0.2
YMMV.
-e
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Maureen Barger wrote:
can someone remind me how to do this under unix? thanks.
-
To
However; I did a 'strings mod_jk2-2.0.43.so'
and found:
mod_jk2/2.0.0
Check to see if your mod_jk2.so is a sym link.
Mine is linked to mod_jk2-2.0.43.so
--
***
* Rick Roberts*
* Advanced Information Technologies, Inc. *
Ya... that makes sense. The latest release of JK2 is 2.0.2. You could
possibly be running 2.0.0. I don't know where it's getting 2.0.43 from...
sounds like an apache version.
-e
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Rick Roberts wrote:
However; I did a 'strings mod_jk2-2.0.43.so'
and found:
You are correct -- you can do strings and scroll or start up apache in
debug and it will appear in the error log file as it loads.
At 01:41 PM 7/9/2003 -0400, Rick Roberts wrote:
However; I did a 'strings mod_jk2-2.0.43.so'
and found:
mod_jk2/2.0.0
Check to see if your mod_jk2.so is a sym
I am trying to download a previously compiled version of mod_jk.so for AIX
from
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/bin/aix/
However it seems I can't unpack it into my libexec directory and go -
starting apache gives me errors that it cannot load
The 2.0.43 is an Apache version, it has nothing to do with the version of
the actual connector source.
You can have a connector that is version 2.0.2, for example, that is
compiled for Apache 2.0.40, .43, .44, and .46. The convention when
delivering the binaries, then, is to tag the .so file
can't get a mod_jk.so file compiled from the source file,
jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.4-src.tar.gz, provided on the Tomcat web
site.
I have tried to read all available documentation on the installation of
mod_jk for Tomcat 4.1.24 and Apache 1.3.27 and earlier releases of both. I
understand
://www.software.hp.com/
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Insley, Simon (Contractor) (DSIO) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:25 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Creating mod_jk.so from src for HP-UX
My goal is to have a working version of Apache 1.3.27 that invokes Tomcat
4.1.24
Checking my mod_jk.log and Apache error_log, I found that there was a segmentation
fault which seems to point to there being a problem with my mod_jk.so
error_log
-
[Mon Mar 17 14:46:07 2003] [notice] child pid exit signal Segmentation Fault (11)
mod_jk.log
--
[Mon Mar 17 14
I went ahead and ignored the warnings and now I get:
# cd /usr/local/apache/bin
# apachectl start
Syntax error on line 4 of /usr/local/tomcat/conf/auto/mod_jk.conf:
Cannot load /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk.so into server: dlopen:
/usr/local/
apache/libexec/mod_jk.so: symbol
PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: build-unix.sh error for mod_jk.so
I went ahead and ignored the warnings and now I get:
# cd /usr/local/apache/bin
# apachectl start
Syntax error on line 4 of /usr/local/tomcat/conf/auto/mod_jk.conf:
Cannot load /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk.so
is
trying to do.
John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 11:27 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: build-unix.sh error for mod_jk.so
Ok, I know Tru64 Unix has a limited life, but has anyone successfully
Please respond to Tomcat Users List
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: build-unix.sh error for mod_jk.so
I have zero experience with Tru64. The only thing I would try, if it were
me, is statically linking JK into Apache, instead of using
, February 27, 2003 11:37 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: build-unix.sh error for mod_jk.so
I'm using apache 1.3.27--Should I upgrade, if so which
version would you
recommend?
Sincerely,
David Vann
Martha Jefferson Hospital
459 Locust Avenue
Charlottesville, VA 22902
[EMAIL
When trying to build mod_jk.so on Tru64 Unix 5.1 using Apache 1.3.27 and
tomcat 3.3.1a I get the following error, can someone guild me in the
correct direction:
Compiling mod_jk
13 cc -DOSF1 -DUSE_HSREGEX -DUSE_EXPAT -I../lib/expat-lite
-DSHARED_MODULE
-I/usr/local/apache/include -I
: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 12:05 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: build-unix.sh error for mod_jk.so
When trying to build mod_jk.so on Tru64 Unix 5.1 using Apache
1.3.27 and
tomcat 3.3.1a I get the following error, can someone guild me in the
correct direction:
Compiling mod_jk
13 cc
(434) 244-5911
Fax (434) 982-7351
Mike Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
02/26/2003 04:23 PM
Please respond to Tomcat Users List
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: build-unix.sh error for mod_jk.so
I don't see the that thread option set, so
/apache/libexec/mod_jk.so into server: dlopen: Can't
open
needed library: /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk.so
I've tried creating mod_jk.so but have not had any success. What can I do
to create this object on Tru64 Unix 5.1. We are using an ES40 Compaq
Alpha server.
I tried the following
Citeren Turner, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Compile/Recompile:
In CONNECTOR_SRC/jk/native (where CONNECTOR_SRC = wherever you unpacked the
connector src):
./buildconf.sh
./configure --with-apxs=/path/to/apache/bin/apxs
make
make install
The .so file will be in CONNECTOR_SRC/jk/native or
[de internetman] Rene Kooyman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Citeren Turner, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Compile/Recompile:
In CONNECTOR_SRC/jk/native (where CONNECTOR_SRC = wherever you unpacked
the
connector src):
./buildconf.sh
http://web.jurriaan.org/examples/jsp/ [ nothin ]
Clicking on this link for me gives a nice, pretty Tomcat page. Are you
sure
that you don't have a caching Proxy server between you and it?
Hi Bill,
The problem isn't that these page's show up (fortunatly) but just click
on one of the
on port 80? Apache's log, mod_jk's log in particular. You might
need to jack up JK's logging level.
John
-Original Message-
From: [de internetman] Rene Kooyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 4:16 AM
To: Tomcat Users List; Bill Barker
Subject: Re: mod_jk.so
Citeren Turner, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes, very. This isn't a problem with mod_jk, as far as I can tell.
The 8080 URL didn't work for me just now, which implies to me that Tomcat
isn't even up, but that might be due to maintenance instead of error.
Can you post the log entries that you
Well, if you keep going with mod_webapp, it will all be wasted, eventually.
It's dead.
John
-Original Message-
From: [de internetman] Rene Kooyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 1:47 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so / apache 1.3.27
modules/mod_jk.so uses plain Apache 1.3 API, this module
might crash under EAPI! (please recompile it with -DEAPI)
And like i said before, should this be safe to ignore ... or do i have to
recompile ... and if so: how ?
--
Kind regards,
Rene Kooyman
Message-
From: [de internetman] Rene Kooyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 3:33 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: mod_jk.so / apache 1.3.27 / tomcat 4.1.18
Oke, that's done, just use the: /usr/lib/apache folder .. p,
now were getting somewhere, although i
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: mod_jk.so / apache 1.3.27 / tomcat 4.1.18
Oke, that's done, just use the: /usr/lib/apache folder .. p,
now were getting somewhere, although i can't compile normaly because
apxs is located in the other folder ... so be it
Now md_jk.so will load... but here's
r ... so be it
Now md_jk.so will load... but here's the error messages i was telling
you about earlier:
[warn] Loaded DSO modules/mod_jk.so uses plain Apache 1.3 API, this module
might crash under EAPI! (please recompile it with -DEAPI)
And like i said before, should this be safe to ignore ...
mod_headers.c
mod_usertrack.c
mod_unique_id.c
mod_so.c
mod_setenvif.c
mod_perl.c
I get the following error -
/appl/optisys/apache/bin apachectl configtest
Syntax error on line 236 of /appl/optisys/apache/conf/httpd.conf:
Cannot load /appl/optisys/apache/libexec/mod_jk.so into server: dlopen:
/appl
Hi,
Whether it's a bug or not, it's definitely a strange thing going on, and at
this point in time I suspect the mod_jk.so is the problem. I hope I can get
a little verification.
I have a Location Apache directive inside a SSL-enabled virtualhost, and
if I go to a *directory* under that location
-
From: Dan Higgins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 1:03 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Apache 2.0 mod_jk.so bug ?
Hi,
Whether it's a bug or not, it's definitely a strange thing going
on, and at
this point in time I suspect the mod_jk.so is the problem. I
Hi,
We are trying to get Tomcat 4.1.12 and Apache 1 3 26 working together using
mod_jk.so.
We are receiving the followitng error :
Starting httpd: Syntax error on line 224 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf:
Cannot load /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk.so into server:
/usr/local/apache/libexec
I got this on Apache 1.3.27. I assume you downloaded the binary
mod_jk.so. Make sure that you got that fits your use or non-use of SSL
in the server. Not sure where you got the binary, but there is a note on
the jakarta connector download page that lists which binary is for
which.
I myself just
:
29/10/2002 18:02 Subject: MOD_JK.SO
Please respond
:
29/10/2002 18:02 Subject: MOD_JK.SO
Please respond to
Tomcat Users
Actually it turned out not to be the build!
if I edit httpd.conf thus:
...
LoadModule alias_module modules/mod_alias.so
LoadModule rewrite_module modules/mod_rewrite.so
LoadModule perl_module modules/mod_perl.so
LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
...
I then mod_jk is not recognized
mod_jk.so for Linux
Actually it turned out not to be the build!
if I edit httpd.conf thus:
...
LoadModule alias_module modules/mod_alias.so
LoadModule rewrite_module modules/mod_rewrite.so
LoadModule perl_module modules/mod_perl.so
LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
...
I
This is with TC 4.0.6, TC Connectors 4.0.6, Apache 2.0.42 and Linux Red Hat
7.2
What versions are you using?
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 11:28 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Building mod_jk.so for Linux
connector (built from source pre 1.2.0), Apache
1.3.26
Tomcat 4.1.10, homegrown connector, Apache 2.0.4x
John
-Original Message-
From: Brett Knights [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 2:35 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Building mod_jk.so for Linux
1 - 100 of 520 matches
Mail list logo
