Re: mod_webapp.so versus mod_jk

2002-11-21 Thread Bill Barker
"Matthew Hannigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:51:33PM -0600, Kent Perrier wrote: > > On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 13:24, Steve Cromer wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I would like to integrate Tomcat and Apache. I noti

Re: mod_webapp.so versus mod_jk

2002-11-20 Thread Matthew Hannigan
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:51:33PM -0600, Kent Perrier wrote: > On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 13:24, Steve Cromer wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I would like to integrate Tomcat and Apache. I noticed that there is more than > > one way to do this. One way involves Warp, using mod_webapp.so and another > >

Re: mod_webapp.so versus mod_jk

2002-11-20 Thread Kent Perrier
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 13:24, Steve Cromer wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to integrate Tomcat and Apache. I noticed that there is more than > one way to do this. One way involves Warp, using mod_webapp.so and another > involves mod_jk. > Please, go look in the archives. This question is ask

mod_webapp.so versus mod_jk

2002-11-20 Thread Steve Cromer
Hi, I would like to integrate Tomcat and Apache. I noticed that there is more than one way to do this. One way involves Warp, using mod_webapp.so and another involves mod_jk. My question is, which one of these is better and why. Are one of these methods a newer and better approach for integ